• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹壁重建术后加速康复可减少术后住院时间:一项观察性队列研究。

Enhanced recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction reduces length of postoperative stay: An observational cohort study.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Surgery. 2019 Feb;165(2):393-397. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.035. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.035
PMID:30195401
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery has been shown to lead to improved postoperative outcomes after several surgical procedures. However, only a few studies have examined the application of enhanced recovery after surgery after abdominal wall reconstruction. The aim of the current observational cohort study was to evaluate the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery after abdominal wall reconstruction in a large cohort.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction in a standard care pathway (control group) with patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. Registered outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications, length of stay, and readmission rate.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction for large incisional hernias were included in the study, of which 96 were treated according to standard protocol, and 94 underwent enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. Length of stay was significantly reduced after the introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery (median 4, interquartile range 3-6 days vs. control 5, 4-7 days, P < .001). There was no difference between the cohorts in the incidence of postoperative complications requiring operative intervention (enhanced recovery after surgery 10.6% vs control 10.4%, P = 1.0) or the rate of readmissions (enhanced recovery after surgery 16.0% vs control 12.5%, P = .635).

CONCLUSION

Enhanced recovery after surgery is feasible after abdominal wall reconstruction, leading to reduced length of stay without increasing the rate of complications or readmissions. Enhanced recovery should be implemented as standard in centers performing abdominal wall reconstruction.

摘要

背景

多项外科手术的研究均表明,术后加速康复可改善术后结局。但仅有少数研究探讨了加速康复在腹壁重建中的应用。本观察性队列研究的目的在于评估在腹壁重建中应用加速康复的效果。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究,比较了标准治疗组(对照组)与加速康复组患者的术后 30 天并发症、住院时间和再入院率。

结果

本研究共纳入 190 例行腹壁重建术治疗大型切口疝的患者,其中 96 例接受标准治疗,94 例接受加速康复治疗。加速康复治疗后住院时间明显缩短(中位数 4 天,四分位距 3-6 天 vs. 对照组 5 天,4-7 天,P<0.001)。两组术后需要手术干预的并发症发生率(加速康复组 10.6% vs. 对照组 10.4%,P=1.0)或再入院率(加速康复组 16.0% vs. 对照组 12.5%,P=0.635)无差异。

结论

腹壁重建后实施加速康复是可行的,可缩短住院时间,不增加并发症或再入院率。在施行腹壁重建的中心,应将加速康复作为标准方案实施。

相似文献

1
Enhanced recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction reduces length of postoperative stay: An observational cohort study.腹壁重建术后加速康复可减少术后住院时间:一项观察性队列研究。
Surgery. 2019 Feb;165(2):393-397. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.035. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
2
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
3
Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction.腹部壁重建患者的术后康复加强路径。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):849-853. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
4
The Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway Implementation on Abdominal-Based Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.加速康复外科路径实施对腹部型微血管乳房重建的影响。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:276-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.062. Epub 2019 May 21.
5
Should enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways be preferred over standard practice for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.对于接受腹壁重建手术的患者,手术加速康复(ERAS)路径是否优于标准治疗方案?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2021 Apr;25(2):501-521. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02262-y. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
6
Reducing Readmissions While Shortening Length of Stay: The Positive Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery.在缩短住院时间的同时减少再入院率:强化康复方案在结直肠癌手术中的积极影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Feb;60(2):219-227. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000748.
7
Use of double-layer autologous dermal flap in the treatment of recurrent and/or infected incisional hernias: presentation of the surgical technique and the results of 1-year follow-up-a prospective, consecutive cohort study.双层自体真皮瓣在复发性和/或感染性切口疝治疗中的应用:手术技术介绍及1年随访结果——一项前瞻性连续队列研究
Hernia. 2016 Jun;20(3):461-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1442-x. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
8
Preoperative, single, high-dose glucocorticoid administration in abdominal wall reconstruction: A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.术前单次大剂量糖皮质激素给药在腹壁重建中的应用:一项随机、双盲临床试验。
Surgery. 2020 Apr;167(4):757-764. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.12.007. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
Compliance to an enhanced recovery pathway among patients with a high frailty index after major gastrointestinal surgery results in improved 30-day outcomes.在大胃肠道手术后,高衰弱指数患者对强化康复路径的依从性可改善 30 天结局。
Surgery. 2019 Jul;166(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.027. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
10
Opioid tolerance impacts compliance with enhanced recovery pathway after major abdominal surgery.阿片类药物耐受影响腹部大手术后强化康复路径的依从性。
Surgery. 2019 Dec;166(6):1055-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Clinical Impact of the Introduction of a Robot-Assisted Program in a Specialized Hernia Center: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study on Short-Term Outcomes.机器人辅助程序引入专业疝气中心的临床影响:一项关于短期结局的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
World J Surg. 2025 Mar;49(3):617-625. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12477. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Enhanced recovery after robotic ventral hernia repair: factors associated with overnight stay in hospital.机器人腹疝修补术后的加速康复:与住院过夜相关的因素。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):223-231. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02871-3. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
3
Ileus rate after abdominal wall reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of two clinical trials.
腹壁重建术后肠梗阻发生率:两项临床试验的回顾性分析。
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1591-1598. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02687-7. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
4
Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias.与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片修补术(IPOM)治疗中小尺寸腹外疝相比,机器人辅助腹直肌后入路疝修补术(rRetrorectus)术后疼痛更少,住院时间更短。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09608-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
The European Hernia Society Prehabilitation Project: A Systematic Review of Intra-Operative Prevention Strategies for Surgical Site Occurrences in Ventral Hernia Surgery.欧洲疝学会术前康复项目:腹疝手术中手术部位事件的术中预防策略的系统评价
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 13;9:847279. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.847279. eCollection 2022.
6
Physical activity recommendations pre and post abdominal wall reconstruction: a scoping review of the evidence.腹壁重建术前和术后的体力活动建议:证据的范围综述。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):701-714. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02562-5. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放式腹疝修补术后预防性负压伤口治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1481-1490. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02485-7. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
8
Enhanced recovery after surgical repair of incisional hernias.手术修复切口疝后的加速康复。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01992-y. Epub 2019 Jun 8.