Jia Zhen Yu, Jiang Yuan Yuan, Woo Jung Min, Hwang Seon Moon, Lim Ok Kyun, Kim Tae Il, Park Jung Cheol, Lee Hee Sun, Kim Eun Sang, Lee Deok Hee
Departments of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Neurointervention. 2018 Sep;13(2):117-123. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2018.00976. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Wide-neck aneurysms (WNAs) associated with a dilated parent artery (PA) are not uncommon morphological abnormalities and usually cause inappropriate wall apposition and incomplete neck coverage of a tubular stent in stent-assisted coiling of aneurysms. We aimed to introduce a fusiform-shaped stent (FSS) and test its effectiveness in treating intracranial WNAs associated with a dilated PA using a three-dimensional (3D) model.
Two FSS types were designed with the middle one-third segment dilated by 10% (FSS10) and 20% (FSS20) and were compared with the tubular-shaped stent (TSS). A patient-specific 3D WNA model was prototyped and produced, and in vitro stent placement was performed. Angiographic images of the three stent types were analyzed and compared using predetermined parameters.
The stent lumens were significantly larger in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS in the middle segments (P=0.046), particularly FSS20 (P=0.018). The non-covered area at the ostium tended to be smaller in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The stent length was significantly longer in FSS10 and FSS20 than in TSS. The stent cell size was significantly larger in FSS than in TSS.
Better vessel wall apposition and aneurysmal neck coverage was observed for FSS than for TSS. No significant difference was observed between FSS10 and FSS20.
与扩张的载瘤动脉(PA)相关的宽颈动脉瘤(WNA)是常见的形态学异常,在动脉瘤支架辅助栓塞中通常会导致不适当的管壁贴合以及管状支架对瘤颈的覆盖不完全。我们旨在引入一种梭形支架(FSS),并使用三维(3D)模型测试其治疗与扩张PA相关的颅内WNA的有效性。
设计了两种FSS类型,中间三分之一段分别扩张10%(FSS10)和20%(FSS20),并与管状支架(TSS)进行比较。制作了一个患者特异性的3D WNA模型并进行体外支架置入。使用预定参数对三种支架类型的血管造影图像进行分析和比较。
FSS10和FSS20中间段的支架管腔明显大于TSS(P = 0.046),尤其是FSS20(P = 0.018)。FSS10和FSS20开口处的未覆盖面积往往比TSS小,但差异不显著(P>0.05)。FSS10和FSS20的支架长度明显长于TSS。FSS的支架网孔尺寸明显大于TSS。
与TSS相比,FSS观察到更好的血管壁贴合和瘤颈覆盖。FSS10和FSS20之间未观察到显著差异。