Suppr超能文献

波前引导和波前优化的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)及准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光后的对比敏感度

Contrast Sensitivity After Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized PRK and LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

作者信息

Ryan Denise S, Sia Rose K, Rabin Jeff, Rivers Bruce A, Stutzman Richard D, Pasternak Joseph F, Eaddy Jennifer B, Logan Lorie A, Bower Kraig S

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2018 Sep 1;34(9):590-596. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180716-01.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare contrast sensitivity among participants undergoing wavefront-guided or wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or LASIK for the treatment of myopia or myopic astigmatism 12 months after surgery.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, 215 participants with myopia ranging from -0.50 to -7.25 diopters (D) and less than -3.50 D of manifest astigmatism electing to undergo either LASIK or PRK were randomized to receive wavefront-guided or wavefront-optimized treatment. Corrected Super Vision Test (Precision Vision, La Salle, IL) high contrast and small letter contrast sensitivity, uncorrected postoperative contrast sensitivity function, and uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity were measured preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference within each of the four groups over time when measuring high contrast visual acuity (P < .001) and small letter contrast sensitivity (P < .001), with the most significant decrease occurring 1 month postoperatively. However, there were no significant differences when comparing the four groups for high contrast sensitivity (P = .22) or small letter contrast sensitivity (P = .06). The area under the logarithm of contrast sensitivity function did not differ significantly over time (P = .09) or between groups (P = .16). A pairwise comparison of preoperative to 12-month CDVA showed a significant improvement in all groups (P < .017). The change in CDVA was also significantly different between groups as determined by one-way analysis of variance (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized PRK and LASIK procedures maintained high contrast, small letter contrast sensitivity, and contrast sensitivity function 12 months postoperatively. Although the recovery period for visual performance was longer for PRK versus LASIK, there was no significant difference in treatment type or treatment profile at 12 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(9):590-596.].

摘要

目的

比较接受波前引导或波前优化的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)或准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)治疗近视或近视散光的参与者术后12个月时的对比敏感度。

方法

在一项前瞻性随机临床试验中,215名近视度数在-0.50至-7.25屈光度(D)之间且显性散光小于-3.50 D、选择接受LASIK或PRK的参与者被随机分配接受波前引导或波前优化治疗。术前以及术后1、3、6和12个月测量矫正超视力测试(Precision Vision,拉萨尔,伊利诺伊州)的高对比度和小写字母对比敏感度、术后未矫正的对比敏感度函数以及未矫正和矫正的远视力。

结果

在测量高对比度视力(P <.001)和小写字母对比敏感度(P <.001)时,四组中的每一组随时间均存在显著差异,术后1个月下降最为显著。然而,在比较四组的高对比度敏感度(P =.22)或小写字母对比敏感度(P =.06)时,没有显著差异。对比敏感度函数对数下的面积随时间(P =.09)或组间(P =.16)没有显著差异。术前与术后12个月最佳矫正视力(CDVA)的成对比较显示所有组均有显著改善(P <.017)。通过单因素方差分析确定,组间CDVA的变化也存在显著差异(P =.003)。

结论

波前引导和波前优化的PRK和LASIK手术在术后12个月时保持了高对比度、小写字母对比敏感度和对比敏感度函数。虽然PRK的视觉性能恢复期比LASIK长,但术后12个月时治疗类型或治疗情况没有显著差异。[《屈光手术杂志》。2018;34(9):590 - 596。]

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验