McDonald Samantha M, Clennin Morgan N, Pate Russell R
Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015 Nov 15;12(1):51-82. doi: 10.1177/1559827615616381. eCollection 2018 Jan-Feb.
The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and evaluate the impact of physical activity (PA) interventions that were implemented in specific school settings on children's PA in those settings. Four research databases were searched to identify PA interventions. Of the 13 706 articles identified, 1352 abstracts were screened and 32 intervention studies were reviewed. Five intervention settings were identified (active travel, after school, classroom, physical education, and recess). Among these settings, a greater proportion of positive findings (ie, significant increase in PA) were found in the classroom (75%) and active travel (67%) settings. Additionally, a higher proportion of interventions implemented in these settings were of high methodological quality (active travel [33%] and classroom [33%]). These findings indicate that interventions in active travel and classrooms settings positively influence youth PA. Importantly, as evidenced in this review, evaluating intervention effects in the targeted setting may provide unique information for future researchers to consider when developing school-based multicomponent PA interventions.
本系统评价的目的是总结和评估在特定学校环境中实施的体育活动(PA)干预措施对该环境中儿童体育活动的影响。检索了四个研究数据库以识别体育活动干预措施。在识别出的13706篇文章中,筛选了1352篇摘要,并对32项干预研究进行了综述。确定了五种干预环境(主动出行、课后、课堂、体育教育和课间休息)。在这些环境中,在课堂(75%)和主动出行(67%)环境中发现了更高比例的积极结果(即体育活动显著增加)。此外,在这些环境中实施的干预措施中,更高比例的干预措施具有较高的方法学质量(主动出行[33%]和课堂[33%])。这些发现表明,主动出行和课堂环境中的干预措施对青少年体育活动有积极影响。重要的是,正如本综述所证明的,在目标环境中评估干预效果可能为未来研究人员在制定基于学校的多成分体育活动干预措施时提供独特的信息以供参考。