Beets Michael W, Okely Anthony, Weaver R Glenn, Webster Collin, Lubans David, Brusseau Tim, Carson Russ, Cliff Dylan P
Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, 1st Flr Suite, RM 131, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Early Start Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Nov 16;13(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0442-2.
Physical activity interventions targeting children and adolescents (≤18 years) often focus on complex intra- and inter-personal behavioral constructs, social-ecological frameworks, or some combination of both. Recently published meta-analytical reviews and large-scale randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that these intervention approaches have largely produced minimal or no improvements in young people's physical activity levels.
In this paper, we propose that the main reason for previous studies' limited effects is that fundamental mechanisms that lead to change in youth physical activity have often been overlooked or misunderstood. Evidence from observational and experimental studies is presented to support the development of a new theory positing that the primary mechanisms of change in many youth physical activity interventions are approaches that fall into one of the following three categories: (a) the expansion of opportunities for youth to be active by the inclusion of a new occasion to be active, (b) the extension of an existing physical activity opportunity by increasing the amount of time allocated for that opportunity, and/or (c) the enhancement of existing physical activity opportunities through strategies designed to increase physical activity above routine practice. Their application and considerations for intervention design and interpretation are presented. The utility of these mechanisms, referred to as the Theory of Expanded, Extended, and Enhanced Opportunities (TEO), is demonstrated in their parsimony, logical appeal, support with empirical evidence, and the direct and immediate application to numerous settings and contexts. The TEO offers a new way to understand youth physical activity behaviors and provides a common taxonomy by which interventionists can identify appropriate targets for interventions across different settings and contexts. We believe the formalization of the TEO concepts will propel them to the forefront in the design of future intervention studies and through their use, lead to a greater impact on youth activity behaviors than what has been demonstrated in previous studies.
针对儿童和青少年(≤18岁)的体育活动干预通常侧重于复杂的人际内和人际间行为结构、社会生态框架或两者的某种组合。最近发表的荟萃分析综述和大规模随机对照试验表明,这些干预方法在很大程度上对年轻人的体育活动水平产生的改善微乎其微或毫无改善。
在本文中,我们提出先前研究效果有限的主要原因是导致青少年体育活动变化的基本机制常常被忽视或误解。本文提供了观察性和实验性研究的证据,以支持一种新理论的发展,该理论假定许多青少年体育活动干预中的主要变化机制属于以下三类之一:(a)通过纳入新的活动场合来扩大青少年进行活动的机会;(b)通过增加为该机会分配的时间来延长现有的体育活动机会;和/或(c)通过旨在增加体育活动量超过常规练习的策略来增强现有的体育活动机会。本文介绍了它们在干预设计和解释中的应用及注意事项。这些机制,即扩展、延长和增强机会理论(TEO),在其简洁性、逻辑吸引力、实证证据支持以及对众多环境和背景的直接和即时应用方面都得到了体现。TEO提供了一种理解青少年体育活动行为的新方法,并提供了一个通用的分类法,干预者可以据此在不同的环境和背景中确定合适的干预目标。我们相信,TEO概念的形式化将使其在未来干预研究的设计中处于前沿,并通过其应用,对青少年活动行为产生比先前研究所证明的更大影响。