Suppr超能文献

非接触眼压计测量屈光手术后角膜生物力学变化的比较:微切口透镜切除术与基于瓣的屈光手术-系统评价。

Comparison of corneal biomechanical changes after refractive surgery by noncontact tonometry: small-incision lenticule extraction versus flap-based refractive surgery - a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Research Unit of Ophthalmology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;97(2):127-136. doi: 10.1111/aos.13906. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Abstract

Corneal refractive surgery disrupts corneal integrity and reduces biomechanical stability in consequence of the beneficial refractive alteration. The minimal invasive cap-based refractive procedure, small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), has been proposed to affect corneal integrity less than flap-based procedures, due to the fibre-sparing incision of the strong anterior corneal lamellae. Flap-based procedures include laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate corneal biomechanical changes by noncontact air pulse tonometry after treatment of myopia/myopic astigmatism with SMILE compared to flap-based refractive surgery. A total of 220 publications were identified through a systematic search in PubMed and Embase. Two levels of screening identified nine studies (three randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six nonrandomised clinical trials) eligible for the review. All the nonrandomised clinical trials were graded to have an overall serious risk of bias. Measurements with the Corvis ST were not included in any of the eligible studies. The RCTs found no statistical significant differences between SMILE or flap-based procedures concerning corneal hysteresis (CH) or corneal resistance factor (CRF), as measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. However, a greater reduction in CRF and CH was found in the flap-based group in five and two of the nonrandomised studies, respectively. The findings in this review illustrate that the presumed biomechanical advantages of a cap-based small incision could not be demonstrated in existing studies and by commercially available technology. However, studies with lower levels of evidence suggest less affection of corneal viscoelastic properties after SMILE when evaluating corneal stability by noncontact tonometry.

摘要

角膜屈光手术会破坏角膜完整性,并降低生物力学稳定性,从而带来有益的屈光矫正效果。微创帽式屈光手术,即小切口微透镜提取术(SMILE),由于对坚固的前部角膜层进行了纤维保留式切口,与基于瓣的手术相比,对角膜完整性的影响更小。基于瓣的手术包括激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)、飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和飞秒微透镜提取术(FLEx)。本系统评价的目的是评估通过非接触式空气脉冲眼压计测量,SMILE 治疗近视/近视散光后的角膜生物力学变化,并与基于瓣的屈光手术进行比较。通过在 PubMed 和 Embase 中进行系统搜索,共确定了 220 篇出版物。通过两级筛选,确定了 9 项符合审查条件的研究(3 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 6 项非随机临床试验)。所有非随机临床试验的总体偏倚风险均被评为严重。符合条件的研究中均未包括 Corvis ST 的测量结果。RCT 发现,在使用眼反应分析仪测量角膜滞后(CH)或角膜阻力因子(CRF)时,SMILE 或基于瓣的手术之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,在 5 项非随机研究和 2 项非随机研究中,分别发现基于瓣的组中 CRF 和 CH 的降低幅度更大。本综述的研究结果表明,现有的研究和商业上可用的技术无法证明基于帽的小切口的假定生物力学优势。然而,在评估角膜稳定性时,非接触式眼压计测量结果表明,SMILE 对角膜粘弹性特性的影响较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验