Suppr超能文献

欧洲继续医学教育(CME)-继续职业发展(CPD)认证的未来:通过对话与共识实现协调统一

The future of accreditation of continuing medical education (CME)-continuing professional development (CPD) in Europe: harmonisation through dialogue and consensus.

作者信息

de Andrade Fabiola, Griebenow Reinhard, Costello Richard W, Guenova Margarita, Schaefer Robert, Chalmers James D, Tichelli Andre, Raguz Drazen, Stein Joerg

机构信息

Continuing Medical Education - European Accreditors (CME-EA) Registered Association, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Eur CME. 2018 Sep 3;7(1):1506202. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2018.1506202. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

In Europe, there are currently some 30 different jurisdictions and no overarching legislation regarding CME-CPD accreditation, since legislative competency related to national health-care systems lies with national authorities. Thus, public demonstration of professional agreement regarding the principles, rules and practice of CME-CPD as well as its accreditation is a highly desirable professional and political objective in Europe, where free movement and freedom to offer professional (medical) services is a key feature of the EU vision of the single market. The newly formed association of independent European accreditors, Continuing Medical Education - European Accreditors (CME-EA) is committed to offering a platform for dialogue between individuals and organisations involved in definition of professional codes in general, and accreditation of CME-CPD in particular on the national level. The aim is to reach a European consensus on principles and rules applied in planning and delivery of CME-CPD. This includes consensus on constituent characteristics of accreditors as well as principles and practice of accreditation.

摘要

在欧洲,目前约有30个不同的司法管辖区,且没有关于继续医学教育-继续职业发展认证的总体立法,因为与国家医疗保健系统相关的立法权归国家当局所有。因此,在欧洲,就继续医学教育-继续职业发展的原则、规则和实践及其认证达成专业共识并进行公开展示,是一个非常理想的专业和政治目标,在欧盟单一市场愿景中,专业(医疗)服务的自由流动和提供自由是其关键特征。新成立的欧洲独立认证机构协会,即继续医学教育-欧洲认证机构(CME-EA),致力于为参与制定一般专业规范,特别是国家层面继续医学教育-继续职业发展认证的个人和组织提供一个对话平台。目的是就继续医学教育-继续职业发展规划和实施中应用的原则和规则达成欧洲共识。这包括就认证机构的构成特征以及认证原则和实践达成共识。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
A 3-Country Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury Practices and Capacity.《三国颅脑创伤实践和能力评估》
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e517-e526. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.115. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验