1 Cornell Center for Research on End-of-Life Care , Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
2 Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York, New York.
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jan;22(1):34-40. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0244. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
Little is known about disparities in end-of-life (EoL) care between U.S. immigrants and nonimmigrants.
To determine immigrant/nonimmigrant advanced cancer patient differences in receipt of values-inconsistent aggressive medical care near the EoL.
Analysis of data from Coping with Cancer, a federally funded, prospective, multi-institutional cohort study of advanced cancer patients with limited life expectancies recruited from 2002 to 2008.
SETTING/SUBJECTS: U.S. academic medical center and community-based clinics. Self-reported immigrant (n = 41) and nonimmigrant (n = 261) advanced cancer patients with poor prognoses who died within the study observation period.
The primary independent/predictor variable was patient immigrant status. Primary outcome variables: (1) aggressive medical care near death, operationalized as the use of mechanical ventilation, resuscitation, feeding tube, and/or antibiotics in the last week of life and (2) receipt of values inconsistent aggressive care, operationalized as receiving aggressive care inconsistent with stated preferences for comfort-focused EoL care.
In a propensity-weighted sample (N = 302), in which immigrant and nonimmigrant groups were weighted to be demographically similar, immigrants were significantly more likely than nonimmigrants to receive aggressive medical care [OR 1.9; 95% CI (1.0-3.6); p = 0.042] and values-inconsistent aggressive medical care [OR 2.1; 95% CI (1.1-4.2); p = 0.032] near death.
Immigrant, as compared with nonimmigrant, advanced cancer patients are not only more likely to receive aggressive EoL care, but also more likely to receive care counter to their wishes. These findings indicate potential disparities in, rather than differences in preference for, aggressive care and a need for further investigation into potential causes of these disparities.
关于美国移民与非移民在临终关怀方面的差异,我们知之甚少。
确定在生命末期接受价值观不一致的强化医疗护理方面,移民与非移民晚期癌症患者的差异。
对“应对癌症”(Coping with Cancer)的数据进行分析,这是一项由联邦资助的、前瞻性的、多机构队列研究,研究对象为 2002 年至 2008 年期间招募的预期寿命有限的晚期癌症患者。
地点/参与者:美国学术医疗中心和社区诊所。自报移民(n=41)和非移民(n=261)晚期癌症患者,预后不佳,在研究观察期间死亡。
主要的独立/预测变量是患者的移民身份。主要结果变量:(1)死亡临近时接受强化医疗护理,定义为在生命的最后一周使用机械通气、复苏、喂养管和/或抗生素;(2)接受价值观不一致的强化护理,定义为接受与舒适为重点的临终护理意愿不符的强化护理。
在倾向评分加权样本(N=302)中,移民和非移民组在人口统计学上相似,移民比非移民更有可能接受强化医疗护理[比值比(OR)1.9;95%置信区间(CI)(1.0-3.6);p=0.042]和价值观不一致的强化医疗护理[OR 2.1;95% CI(1.1-4.2);p=0.032]。
与非移民相比,移民晚期癌症患者不仅更有可能接受临终强化护理,而且更有可能接受违背其意愿的护理。这些发现表明,在强化护理的接受程度上可能存在差异,而不是偏好上的差异,需要进一步调查造成这些差异的潜在原因。