Department of Electrical Engineering, Hwa Hsia University of Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Physiol Meas. 2018 Oct 11;39(10):105002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aae0eb.
Falling is an important health maintenance issue for the elderly and people with movement disorders, strokes and multiple sclerosis. With the development of light, low-cost wearable technology, inertia-based fall detection has gained much attention. However, some large movements, such as jumping and postural changes, are frequently confounded with falls. For example, commonly used fall detection methods based on acceleration amplitude produce a large number of false alerts unless they are combined with post-fall posture identification. In this paper, we propose two new inertial parameters to improve the selectivity of threshold-based fall detection methods, and evaluate strategies to distinguish falls from other activities of daily life (ADLs).
We define two new inertial parameters, acceleration cubic-product-root magnitude (ACM) and angular velocity cubic-product-root magnitude (AVCM). Along with acceleration magnitude (AM), we test threshold-based fall detection methods based on single parameters and combinations. We collected inertial data on four types of simulated falls and eight types of ADLs from a study with 15 participants wearing a chest-mounted sensor with accelerometer and gyroscope. Two public datasets, UMAFall and Cognent Labs, were also included to evaluate fall detection methods.
We chose the detection threshold with 99% sensitivity and the best possible specificity. The hybrid of AM, ACM and AVCM method had a lower rate of misclassification than single-parameter methods. Leave-one-out cross-validation shows that the hybrid fall detection method can achieve both high specificity and high sensitivity.
Using multiple inertial parameters improves the specificity of fall detection.
跌倒对于老年人和运动障碍、中风及多发性硬化症患者来说是一个重要的健康维护问题。随着轻便、低成本可穿戴技术的发展,基于惯性的跌倒检测引起了广泛关注。然而,一些大动作,如跳跃和姿势变化,经常与跌倒混淆。例如,基于加速度幅度的常用跌倒检测方法会产生大量误报,除非与跌倒后姿势识别相结合。在本文中,我们提出了两个新的惯性参数来提高基于阈值的跌倒检测方法的选择性,并评估了区分跌倒与日常生活活动(ADL)中其他活动的策略。
我们定义了两个新的惯性参数,即加速度立方积根幅度(ACM)和角速度立方积根幅度(AVCM)。与加速度幅度(AM)一起,我们测试了基于单参数和组合的基于阈值的跌倒检测方法。我们从一项研究中收集了 15 名佩戴胸部安装传感器(带有加速度计和陀螺仪)的参与者进行的四种模拟跌倒和八种 ADL 的惯性数据。两个公共数据集,UMAFall 和 Cognent Labs,也被用来评估跌倒检测方法。
我们选择了具有 99%敏感性和最佳特异性的检测阈值。AM、ACM 和 AVCM 混合方法的分类错误率低于单参数方法。留一法交叉验证表明,混合跌倒检测方法可以实现高特异性和高敏感性。
使用多个惯性参数可以提高跌倒检测的特异性。