Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, United Kingdom.
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0201666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201666. eCollection 2018.
Marine recreational fishing (MRF) has been shown to substantially contribute to fishing mortality of marine fish. However, European MRF catches are only quantified for a small number of stocks, so it is unclear whether a significant part of fishing mortality is excluded from stock assessments. This study estimated: (i) European MRF removals, which were defined as landings plus dead releases; and (ii) impact at stock level by comparing the percentage contribution to total removal by MRF and commercial fishing. As MRF data were limited for some European countries, catches were reconstructed using a mixture of average release proportions, average fish weights, and extrapolation using the catch per fisher of the nearest country providing catch estimates. Where catch reconstructions exceeded 50%, data were excluded from further analysis. Furthermore, as MRF survey methodology can be variable, semi-quantitative estimates of bias and error were calculated for each stock. Only 10 of the 20 stocks assessed in this study had sufficient MRF data for full reliable estimates. Percentage contribution to total removals (MRF + commercial removals) by MRF ranged between 2% for Atlantic mackerel in the North Sea and Skagerrak and 43% for Atlantic pollack in the Celtic Seas and English Channel. The biomass removed ranged between 297 (± 116) tonnes (Atlantic cod in the western English Channel and southern Celtic seas) and 4820 (± 1889) tonnes (Atlantic mackerel in the North Sea and Skagerrak), but the errors were substantial. Additionally, the bias in the estimated removals was low for most stocks, with some positive biases found. The present study indicates that removals by MRF can represent a high proportion of the total removals for some European marine fish stocks, so inclusion in stock assessments should be routine. To achieve this, regular surveys of MRF are required to collect data essential for stock assessments.
休闲海钓对海洋鱼类的捕捞死亡率有显著影响。然而,欧洲休闲海钓的渔获仅对少数几个种群进行了量化,因此尚不清楚是否有大量捕捞死亡率被排除在种群评估之外。本研究估计了:(i)欧洲休闲海钓的捕捞量,定义为上岸量加上死亡放流量;(ii)通过比较休闲海钓和商业捕捞对总捕捞量的贡献比例,评估其对种群的影响。由于一些欧洲国家的休闲海钓数据有限,通过平均放流比例、平均鱼类重量以及利用提供渔获量估算的最近国家的每艘渔船渔获量进行外推,对捕捞量进行了重建。如果捕捞量重建超过 50%,则将数据排除在进一步分析之外。此外,由于休闲海钓调查方法可能存在差异,为每个种群计算了偏差和误差的半定量估计。在本研究评估的 20 个种群中,只有 10 个种群有足够的休闲海钓数据进行全面可靠的估计。休闲海钓对总捕捞量(休闲海钓+商业捕捞)的贡献比例从北海和斯卡格拉克的大西洋马鲛的 2%到凯尔特海和英吉利海峡的大西洋无须鳕的 43%不等。被移除的生物量从西部英吉利海峡和南部凯尔特海的大西洋鳕鱼的 297(±116)吨到北海和斯卡格拉克的大西洋马鲛的 4820(±1889)吨不等,但误差很大。此外,大多数种群的估计捕捞量偏差较低,发现了一些正偏差。本研究表明,对于一些欧洲海洋鱼类种群,休闲海钓的捕捞量可能占总捕捞量的很大比例,因此应将其纳入种群评估。为实现这一目标,需要对休闲海钓进行定期调查,以收集对种群评估至关重要的数据。