Suppr超能文献

基于证据的临床试验妊娠检测:来自多方利益相关者发展过程的建议。

Evidence-based pregnancy testing in clinical trials: Recommendations from a multi-stakeholder development process.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0202474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202474. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Most clinical trials exclude pregnant women in order to avoid the possibility of adverse embryonic and/or fetal effects. Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding appropriate methods for identifying early pregnancy among research subjects. This lack of guidance results in wide variation in pregnancy testing plans, leading to the potential for inadequate protection against embryonic or fetal exposure in some cases and unnecessary burdens on research participants in others, as well as inefficiencies caused by disagreements among sponsors, investigators, and regulators. To address this issue, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative convened content experts and stakeholders to develop recommendations for pregnancy testing in clinical research based on currently available evidence. Recommendations included: 1) the study protocol should clearly state the rationale for pregnancy testing and the plan for handling positive and indeterminate tests; 2) protocols should include an assessment of the pregnancy testing plan advantages (reduced risk of embryo/fetal exposure) versus the burdens (participant burden, study team workload, costs); 3) protocols should assess the participant burdens regarding the likelihood of false negative and false positive results; 4) participant administered home pregnancy testing should be avoided in clinical trials; and 5) the consent process should describe the extent of knowledge about the study intervention's potential risk to the embryo/fetus and the limitations and consequences of pregnancy testing. CTTI has also developed an online tool to help implement these recommendations.

摘要

大多数临床试验为避免胚胎和/或胎儿出现不良反应的可能性,将孕妇排除在外。目前,尚没有关于研究对象妊娠早期识别的适当方法的循证指南。这种缺乏指导导致妊娠检测计划差异很大,在某些情况下可能无法充分保护胚胎或胎儿免受暴露,而在其他情况下则给研究参与者带来不必要的负担,并因赞助商、研究者和监管机构之间的意见不合而导致效率低下。为了解决这个问题,临床试验转化倡议召集了内容专家和利益相关者,根据现有证据制定了临床研究中妊娠检测的建议。建议包括:1)研究方案应明确说明妊娠检测的基本原理和处理阳性和不确定检测的计划;2)方案应包括评估妊娠检测计划的优势(降低胚胎/胎儿暴露的风险)与负担(参与者负担、研究团队工作量、成本);3)方案应评估参与者对假阴性和假阳性结果的可能性的负担;4)应避免在临床试验中进行参与者自行进行的家庭妊娠检测;5)知情同意过程应描述对研究干预对胚胎/胎儿潜在风险的了解程度,以及妊娠检测的局限性和后果。CTTI 还开发了一个在线工具,以帮助实施这些建议。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based pregnancy testing in clinical trials: Recommendations from a multi-stakeholder development process.
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0202474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202474. eCollection 2018.
2
Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Oct;30(10):918-932. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5.
3
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
4
"Hook-like effect" causes false-negative point-of-care urine pregnancy testing in emergency patients.
J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;44(1):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.032. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
9
Evaluation of the beta-Neocept test for early pregnancy.
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Sep 15;131(6):583-5.
10
Negative urine hCG in choriocarcinoma.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Jul;98(1):59-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.03.040. Epub 2007 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
IL-6 and IL-8: An Overview of Their Roles in Healthy and Pathological Pregnancies.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 23;23(23):14574. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314574.
2
Gestational intermittent hyperoxia rescues murine genetic congenital heart disease in part.
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 23;11(1):6608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85569-9.
3
Unintended drug exposure during pregnancy in clinical trials - a survey in early drug development.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;59(1):26-30. doi: 10.5414/CP203788.

本文引用的文献

1
The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative: Methodology supporting the mission.
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1_suppl):13-18. doi: 10.1177/1740774518755054.
2
Proposed clinical guidance for excluding pregnancy prior to contraceptive initiation.
Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):326-330. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
3
Birth Control in Clinical Trials: Industry Survey of Current Use Practices, Governance, and Monitoring.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Mar;50(2):155-168. doi: 10.1177/2168479015608415. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
4
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin no. 150. Early pregnancy loss.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1258-1267. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000465191.27155.25.
5
Strips of Hope: Accuracy of Home Pregnancy Tests and New Developments.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014 Jul;74(7):661-669. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368589.
6
Should the qualitative serum pregnancy test be considered obsolete?
Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Feb;137(2):194-202. doi: 10.1309/AJCPH1PJSA9TWYOZ.
7
The utility of six over-the-counter (home) pregnancy tests.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Aug;49(8):1317-1322. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.211.
9
Predictive value of early serum beta-hCG levels after single blastocyst transfer.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(12):1382-8. doi: 10.3109/00016340903322743.
10
The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research.
Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2008 Fall;1(2):5-22. doi: 10.1353/ijf.0.0047.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验