• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Information exchange between patients with Lynch syndrome and their genetic and non-genetic health professionals: whose responsibility?林奇综合征患者与其基因及非基因健康专业人员之间的信息交流:谁的责任?
J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):237-247. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0381-5. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions.改善家族性乳腺癌遗传咨询的转诊流程:两项干预措施的三项随机对照试验结果
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta9030.
4
Exploring clinicians' attitudes about using aspirin for risk reduction in people with Lynch Syndrome with no personal diagnosis of colorectal cancer.探究临床医生对于在未个人诊断为结直肠癌的林奇综合征患者中使用阿司匹林进行风险降低的态度。
Fam Cancer. 2017 Jan;16(1):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9933-1.
5
Challenges in the diagnosis and management of Lynch Syndrome in an Indigenous family living in a remote West Australian community.西澳大利亚偏远社区一个原住民家庭中林奇综合征诊断与管理面临的挑战。
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(4):1836. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
6
The Current Practice of Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis and Management in Italy: A Qualitative Assessment.意大利林奇综合征诊断与管理的当前实践:一项定性评估。
Public Health Genomics. 2019;22(5-6):189-207. doi: 10.1159/000504305. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.产前诊断的结构性先天性异常的评估
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Sep;31(9):875-881. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34307-9.
8
Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol.比较基于理论和非理论的实施方法以改善癌症遗传学中的转诊实践:一项集群随机试验方案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 20;20(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6.
9
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
10
Improving the uptake of predictive testing and colorectal screening in Lynch syndrome: a regional primary care survey.提高林奇综合征预测性检测和结直肠癌筛查的接受率:一项区域初级保健调查
Clin Genet. 2015 Jun;87(6):517-24. doi: 10.1111/cge.12559. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' experiences and perspectives of reproductive genetic carrier screening in gamete donation: a scoping review.利益相关者在配子捐赠中进行生殖遗传携带者筛查的经验与观点:一项范围综述
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf128.
2
Readiness of Primary Healthcare Physicians for Providing Genetic Services.基层医疗医生提供基因服务的准备情况。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 26;17(1):e78031. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78031. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
A practical method for integrating community priorities in planning and implementing cancer control programs.一种将社区优先事项纳入癌症控制规划和实施的实用方法。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):113-123. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01688-w. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
4
General practitioners' (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review.全科医生(GP)对临床遗传服务的经验、态度和需求:系统评价。
Fam Med Community Health. 2022 Nov;10(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001515.
5
Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.遗传性癌症综合征风险降低干预措施的系统性障碍:对医疗保健不公平现象的影响。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov 3;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00233. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying "ownership" through role descriptions to support implementing universal colorectal cancer tumor screening for Lynch syndrome.通过角色描述来确定“所有权”,以支持实施林奇综合征的大肠癌肿瘤普遍筛查。
Genet Med. 2017 Nov;19(11):1236-1244. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.39. Epub 2017 May 4.
2
Patient Navigation-An Effective Strategy to Reduce Health Care Costs and Improve Health Outcomes.患者导航——降低医疗成本并改善健康结局的有效策略。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):825-826. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6107.
3
Knowledge and Uptake of Genetic Counseling and Colonoscopic Screening Among Individuals at Increased Risk for Lynch Syndrome and their Endoscopists from the Family Health Promotion Project.家庭健康促进项目中林奇综合征风险增加个体及其内镜医师对遗传咨询和结肠镜筛查的认知与接受情况
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):285-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.397. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
4
Gatekeeper role of gastroenterologists and surgeons in recognising and discussing familial colorectal cancer.胃肠病学家和外科医生在识别和讨论家族性结直肠癌中的把关人角色。
Fam Cancer. 2016 Apr;15(2):231-40. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9861-5.
5
Effect of comprehensive oncogenetics training interventions for general practitioners, evaluated at multiple performance levels.针对全科医生的综合肿瘤遗传学培训干预措施的效果,在多个绩效水平上进行评估。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0122648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122648. eCollection 2015.
6
100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?林奇综合征 100 年:我们对心理社会问题有哪些了解?
Fam Cancer. 2013 Jun;12(2):325-39. doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9653-8.
7
Attitudes and practices among internists concerning genetic testing.内科医生对基因检测的态度和做法。
J Genet Couns. 2013 Feb;22(1):90-100. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9504-z. Epub 2012 May 15.
8
The use of a family history risk assessment tool within a community health care system: views of primary care providers.社区医疗保健系统中家族病史风险评估工具的使用:初级保健提供者的观点
J Genet Couns. 2012 Oct;21(5):652-61. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9479-1. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
9
Bias in the reporting of family history: implications for clinical care.家族史报告中的偏差:对临床护理的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Aug;21(4):547-56. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9470-x. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
10
Barriers to and motivations for physician referral of patients to cancer genetics clinics.医生将患者转诊至癌症遗传学诊所的障碍与动机。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Apr;21(2):305-25. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9401-x. Epub 2011 Aug 13.

林奇综合征患者与其基因及非基因健康专业人员之间的信息交流:谁的责任?

Information exchange between patients with Lynch syndrome and their genetic and non-genetic health professionals: whose responsibility?

作者信息

Douma Kirsten F L, Bleeker Fonnet E, Medendorp Niki M, Croes Emmelyn A J, Smets Ellen M A

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):237-247. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0381-5. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-018-0381-5
PMID:30209752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6435774/
Abstract

Individuals at high risk for Lynch syndrome (LS) should be offered genetic counselling, since preventive options are available. However, uptake of genetic services and follow-up care are currently suboptimal, possibly caused by inadequate exchange of information. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to gain insight in the process of information exchange between patients diagnosed with LS and their non-genetic (i.e., general practitioner, gastroenterologist, gynaecologist) and genetic (i.e., clinical geneticist or genetic counsellor) health professionals concerning referral for genetic counselling and follow-up care. Participants comprised 13 patients diagnosed with LS (8 index patients and 5 of their affected relatives) and 24 health professionals (6 general practitioners, 8 gastroenterologists, 6 gynaecologists and 4 genetic health professionals). Analysis of the interview transcripts was performed in parallel and again after the interviews, following guidelines for qualitative research and using MAXQDA software. The main finding is that patients may 'get lost' between health professionals who lack a clear overview of their own and each other's role and responsibilities in the referral and follow-up care for patients with possible LS. Education of non-genetic health professionals and optimisation of communication between health professionals might help to enable more timely diagnosis of LS and allow patients to address their doubts and questions to the most appropriate healthcare professional.

摘要

林奇综合征(LS)高危个体应接受遗传咨询,因为有预防性措施可供选择。然而,目前遗传服务的接受情况和后续护理并不理想,这可能是由于信息交流不足所致。因此,这项定性研究旨在深入了解被诊断为LS的患者与其非遗传(即全科医生、胃肠病学家、妇科医生)和遗传(即临床遗传学家或遗传咨询师)健康专业人员之间关于遗传咨询转诊和后续护理的信息交流过程。参与者包括13名被诊断为LS的患者(8名索引患者及其5名受影响的亲属)和24名健康专业人员(6名全科医生、8名胃肠病学家、6名妇科医生和4名遗传健康专业人员)。按照定性研究指南并使用MAXQDA软件,在访谈过程中及访谈结束后对访谈记录进行了并行分析。主要发现是,在转诊和后续护理中,对于可能患有LS的患者,健康专业人员缺乏对自身及彼此角色和责任的清晰认识,患者可能会在这些人员之间“迷失”。对非遗传健康专业人员进行培训以及优化健康专业人员之间的沟通,可能有助于更及时地诊断LS,并让患者能够向最合适的医疗保健专业人员提出疑问。