Suppr超能文献

林奇综合征患者与其基因及非基因健康专业人员之间的信息交流:谁的责任?

Information exchange between patients with Lynch syndrome and their genetic and non-genetic health professionals: whose responsibility?

作者信息

Douma Kirsten F L, Bleeker Fonnet E, Medendorp Niki M, Croes Emmelyn A J, Smets Ellen M A

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):237-247. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0381-5. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

Abstract

Individuals at high risk for Lynch syndrome (LS) should be offered genetic counselling, since preventive options are available. However, uptake of genetic services and follow-up care are currently suboptimal, possibly caused by inadequate exchange of information. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to gain insight in the process of information exchange between patients diagnosed with LS and their non-genetic (i.e., general practitioner, gastroenterologist, gynaecologist) and genetic (i.e., clinical geneticist or genetic counsellor) health professionals concerning referral for genetic counselling and follow-up care. Participants comprised 13 patients diagnosed with LS (8 index patients and 5 of their affected relatives) and 24 health professionals (6 general practitioners, 8 gastroenterologists, 6 gynaecologists and 4 genetic health professionals). Analysis of the interview transcripts was performed in parallel and again after the interviews, following guidelines for qualitative research and using MAXQDA software. The main finding is that patients may 'get lost' between health professionals who lack a clear overview of their own and each other's role and responsibilities in the referral and follow-up care for patients with possible LS. Education of non-genetic health professionals and optimisation of communication between health professionals might help to enable more timely diagnosis of LS and allow patients to address their doubts and questions to the most appropriate healthcare professional.

摘要

林奇综合征(LS)高危个体应接受遗传咨询,因为有预防性措施可供选择。然而,目前遗传服务的接受情况和后续护理并不理想,这可能是由于信息交流不足所致。因此,这项定性研究旨在深入了解被诊断为LS的患者与其非遗传(即全科医生、胃肠病学家、妇科医生)和遗传(即临床遗传学家或遗传咨询师)健康专业人员之间关于遗传咨询转诊和后续护理的信息交流过程。参与者包括13名被诊断为LS的患者(8名索引患者及其5名受影响的亲属)和24名健康专业人员(6名全科医生、8名胃肠病学家、6名妇科医生和4名遗传健康专业人员)。按照定性研究指南并使用MAXQDA软件,在访谈过程中及访谈结束后对访谈记录进行了并行分析。主要发现是,在转诊和后续护理中,对于可能患有LS的患者,健康专业人员缺乏对自身及彼此角色和责任的清晰认识,患者可能会在这些人员之间“迷失”。对非遗传健康专业人员进行培训以及优化健康专业人员之间的沟通,可能有助于更及时地诊断LS,并让患者能够向最合适的医疗保健专业人员提出疑问。

相似文献

1
Information exchange between patients with Lynch syndrome and their genetic and non-genetic health professionals: whose responsibility?
J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):237-247. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0381-5. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
The Current Practice of Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis and Management in Italy: A Qualitative Assessment.
Public Health Genomics. 2019;22(5-6):189-207. doi: 10.1159/000504305. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Sep;31(9):875-881. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34307-9.
9
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.

引用本文的文献

2
Readiness of Primary Healthcare Physicians for Providing Genetic Services.
Cureus. 2025 Jan 26;17(1):e78031. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78031. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
A practical method for integrating community priorities in planning and implementing cancer control programs.
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):113-123. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01688-w. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Patient Navigation-An Effective Strategy to Reduce Health Care Costs and Improve Health Outcomes.
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):825-826. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6107.
5
Effect of comprehensive oncogenetics training interventions for general practitioners, evaluated at multiple performance levels.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0122648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122648. eCollection 2015.
6
100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?
Fam Cancer. 2013 Jun;12(2):325-39. doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9653-8.
7
Attitudes and practices among internists concerning genetic testing.
J Genet Couns. 2013 Feb;22(1):90-100. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9504-z. Epub 2012 May 15.
8
The use of a family history risk assessment tool within a community health care system: views of primary care providers.
J Genet Couns. 2012 Oct;21(5):652-61. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9479-1. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
9
Bias in the reporting of family history: implications for clinical care.
J Genet Couns. 2012 Aug;21(4):547-56. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9470-x. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
10
Barriers to and motivations for physician referral of patients to cancer genetics clinics.
J Genet Couns. 2012 Apr;21(2):305-25. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9401-x. Epub 2011 Aug 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验