Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Anesthesia, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Can J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;65(12):1296-1302. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1220-1. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
There is little knowledge about how hospitals can best handle disruptions that reduce post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) capacity. Few hospitals in Japan have any PACU beds and instead have the anesthesiologists recover their patients in the operating room. We compared postoperative recovery times between a hospital with (University of Iowa) and without (Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital) a PACU.
This historical cohort study included 16 successive patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia, at each of the hospitals, and with the hours from OR entrance until the last surgical dressing applied ≥ two hours. Postoperative recovery times, defined as the end of surgery until leaving for the surgical ward, were compared between the hospitals.
The median [interquartile range] of recovery times was 112 [94-140] min at the University of Iowa and 22 [18-29] min at the Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital. Every studied patient at the University of Iowa had a longer recovery time than every such patient at Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, P < 0.001). The ratio of the mean recovery times was 4.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.05 to 5.91; P < 0.001) and remained comparable after controlling for surgical duration (5.33; 95% CI, 3.66 to 7.76; P < 0.001). The anesthetics used in the Iowa hospital were a volatile agent, hydromorphone, ketorolac, and neostigmine compared with the Japanese hospital where bispectral index monitoring and target-controlled infusions of propofol, remifentanil, acetaminophen, and sugammadex were used.
This knowledge can be generally applied in situations at hospitals with regular PACU use when there are such large disruptions to PACU capacity that it is known before a case begins that the anesthesiologist likely will need to recover the patient (i.e., when there will not be an available PACU bed and/or nurse). The Japanese anesthesiologists have no PACU labour costs but likely greater anesthesia drug/monitor costs.
关于医院如何最好地处理减少术后恢复病房 (PACU) 容量的干扰,知之甚少。日本很少有医院有任何 PACU 床位,而是让麻醉师在手术室恢复患者。我们比较了有 (爱荷华大学) 和没有 (新百合冈综合医院) PACU 的医院之间的术后恢复时间。
这项回顾性队列研究包括在每家医院接受全身麻醉气管插管腹腔镜妇科手术的 16 名连续患者,手术时间从进入手术室到最后一次手术敷料应用后≥2 小时。比较了两家医院之间的术后恢复时间,定义为手术结束到前往外科病房的时间。
爱荷华大学的中位 [四分位距] 恢复时间为 112 [94-140] 分钟,新百合冈综合医院为 22 [18-29] 分钟。爱荷华大学的每一位研究患者的恢复时间都比新百合冈综合医院的每位患者长(Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney,P<0.001)。平均恢复时间比为 4.90(95%置信区间 [CI],4.05 至 5.91;P<0.001),在控制手术时间后仍保持可比(5.33;95% CI,3.66 至 7.76;P<0.001)。爱荷华州医院使用的麻醉剂是挥发性麻醉剂、氢吗啡酮、酮咯酸和新斯的明,而日本医院使用的是脑电双频指数监测和异丙酚、瑞芬太尼、对乙酰氨基酚和琥珀酸舒马曲坦的靶控输注。
当 PACU 容量受到如此大的干扰以至于在病例开始前就知道麻醉师可能需要恢复患者(即没有可用的 PACU 床位和/或护士)时,这种知识可以普遍应用于常规使用 PACU 的医院的情况。日本麻醉师没有 PACU 劳动力成本,但可能有更大的麻醉药物/监测成本。