McIntyre S L, Higgins J E
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Oct;155(4):796-801. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(86)80023-0.
The results of a randomized United States study indicated that the Today contraceptive sponge was less effective than the diaphragm (1-year cumulative life-table rate of 17.4 versus 12.9 pregnancies per 100 women, p = 0.01). However, this overall comparison is misleading. Using univariate and multivariate analyses to account for the effects of user characteristics we found parity to be the most important single determinant of effectiveness for users of the sponge, but parity was unimportant as a risk factor for pregnancy among diaphragm users. For nulliparous women the sponge was as effective as a physician-prescribed barrier method (13.9 for sponge, 12.8 for diaphragm, p = 0.45); however, parous women using the sponge were twice as likely to become pregnant (28.3 for sponge, 13.4 for diaphragm, p = 0.001). The effect of parity among sponge users is consistent with the results of international studies of the contraceptive sponge.
一项美国随机研究结果表明,今日避孕海绵的效果不如隔膜(每100名女性1年累计生命表妊娠率为17.4次与12.9次,p = 0.01)。然而,这种总体比较具有误导性。使用单变量和多变量分析来考虑使用者特征的影响,我们发现产次是避孕海绵使用者有效性的最重要单一决定因素,但产次作为隔膜使用者怀孕的风险因素并不重要。对于未生育女性,避孕海绵与医生开的屏障法效果相同(避孕海绵为13.9,隔膜为12.8,p = 0.45);然而,使用避孕海绵的经产女性怀孕的可能性是使用隔膜女性的两倍(避孕海绵为28.3,隔膜为13.4,p = 0.001)。避孕海绵使用者中产次的影响与避孕海绵的国际研究结果一致。