Pompeo Eugenio, Rogliani Paola, Cristino Benedetto, Fabbi Eleonora, Dauri Mario, Sergiacomi Gianluigi
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug;10(Suppl 23):S2754-S2762. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.171.
Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) entailing unilateral or bilateral non-anatomical resection of severely damaged emphysematous tissue carried out by thoracoscopic or open surgical approaches, under general anesthesia with single-lung ventilation, has resulted in significant and long-lasting clinical and functional benefit. Unfortunately, the morbidity rates reported by simultaneous bilateral resectional LVRS has led to raise criticism regarding its cost-effectiveness and has stimulated in recent years the development of less invasive bronchoscopic and surgical non-resectional methods of treatment that are preferentially performed in a staged unilateral fashion. We had previously proposed an innovative LVRS modality, which did not entail any resection of lung tissue and was electively carried out according to a staged unilateral strategy by a multiport thoracoscopic access, through thoracic epidural anesthesia in conscious, spontaneously ventilating patients (awake LVRS). The awake LVRS resulted in significant clinical benefit paralleling that achieved by the resectional method with lower morbidity rates and shorter hospital stay. Moreover, the awake LVRS proved also suitable to be employed in stringently selected patients to perform redo procedures following previous successful bilateral LVRS. More recently, in order to minimize the global surgery- and anesthesia-related traumas, we have modified our original non-resectional method by adopting a single thoracoscopic access as well as an anesthesia protocol entailing use of a simple intercostal block with target control sedation, to realize an ultra-minimally invasive or LVRS. Hence, a deeper investigation of the pros and cons of staged unilateral LVRS strategies as well as of the novel surgical non-resectional and redo LVRS is warranted in order to verify, the optimal strategies of treatment, which will prove to reduce the typical LVRS-related morbidity while assuring the most durable benefit in patients with advanced emphysema.
肺减容手术(LVRS)通过胸腔镜或开放手术方式,在单肺通气的全身麻醉下,对严重受损的肺气肿组织进行单侧或双侧非解剖性切除,已带来显著且持久的临床和功能益处。不幸的是,同期双侧切除性LVRS报告的发病率引发了对其成本效益的批评,并在近年来刺激了侵入性较小的支气管镜和非切除性手术治疗方法的发展,这些方法优先以分期单侧方式进行。我们之前提出了一种创新的LVRS模式,该模式不涉及任何肺组织切除,通过多端口胸腔镜通路,在清醒、自主通气的患者中采用胸段硬膜外麻醉,根据分期单侧策略选择性进行(清醒LVRS)。清醒LVRS带来了显著的临床益处,与切除性方法相当,发病率更低,住院时间更短。此外,清醒LVRS还被证明适用于经过严格挑选的患者,以便在先前成功进行双侧LVRS后进行再次手术。最近,为了将与手术和麻醉相关的总体创伤降至最低,我们对原来的非切除性方法进行了改进,采用了单一胸腔镜通路以及一种麻醉方案,该方案需要使用简单的肋间阻滞并结合靶控镇静,以实现超微创或LVRS。因此,有必要对分期单侧LVRS策略以及新型手术非切除性和再次LVRS的利弊进行更深入的研究,以验证最佳治疗策略,这将被证明可以降低典型的LVRS相关发病率,同时确保晚期肺气肿患者获得最持久的益处。