• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球寻求问题赌博帮助的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Global prevalence of help-seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

出版信息

Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):2972-2985. doi: 10.1111/add.15952. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1111/add.15952
PMID:35830876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9796401/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multiple studies have examined barriers and facilitators to help-seeking, but the prevalence of help-seeking for problem gambling (PG) is not well established. We aimed to estimate the international prevalence of help-seeking for PG among the general population and among subgroups of people at risk for PG (i.e. low-risk, moderate-risk and PG).

METHODS

Systematic search of grey literature (through gambling repositories, gambling research institutes and Google) and peer-reviewed literature (through ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus) for gambling prevalence studies that reported on help-seeking for PG. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Studies used representative sampling methods to determine the prevalence of gambling participation and data collection 2010 onward. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The main outcome was population prevalence of help-seeking for PG. Help-seeking was defined as any intentional action to change gambling behaviours, including professional services (inclusive of in-person or distance help), non-professional help (e.g. from family and friends) and self-help. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explain variability in help-seeking prevalence estimates.

RESULTS

Measurement of help-seeking was inconsistent across included studies and, overall, there was high risk of bias. We estimated a general population help-seeking prevalence for PG of 0.23% (95% CI, 0.16-0.33). Prevalence estimates were significantly higher in studies assessing lifetime (0.50%; 95% CI, 0.35-0.71) compared with current help-seeking (0.14%; 95% CI, 0.10-0.20, P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of difference in prevalence estimates by gambling participation, region, type of help-seeking, or year of data collection. Compared with people with low-risk gambling (0.27%; 95% CI, 0.07%-1.04%), prevalence estimates were significantly higher in those with moderate-risk (3.73%; 95% CI, 2.07%-6.63%) and problem gambling (20.63%; 95% CI, 12.89%-31.35%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

One in 25 moderate-risk gamblers and 1 in 5 people with problem gambling have sought help for problems related to their gambling.

摘要

背景与目的

多项研究探讨了寻求帮助的障碍和促进因素,但针对赌博问题的寻求帮助的普遍性尚不清楚。我们旨在估计普通人群以及有赌博问题风险的人群(即低风险、中风险和赌博问题)中寻求赌博问题帮助的国际流行率。

方法

通过赌博知识库、赌博研究所和谷歌进行灰色文献系统搜索,以及通过 ProQuest、PsycINFO、PubMed 和 Scopus 进行同行评审文献系统搜索,以确定报告寻求赌博问题帮助的赌博流行率研究。本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目。研究使用代表性抽样方法来确定赌博参与的流行率,并在 2010 年后进行数据收集。有 24 项研究符合纳入标准。主要结果是寻求赌博问题帮助的人群流行率。寻求帮助被定义为任何旨在改变赌博行为的有意行动,包括专业服务(包括面对面或远程帮助)、非专业帮助(例如来自家人和朋友)和自助。进行了亚组分析以解释寻求帮助流行率估计的可变性。

结果

纳入研究中寻求帮助的测量方法不一致,总体而言,存在高度的偏倚风险。我们估计普通人群中寻求赌博问题帮助的流行率为 0.23%(95%置信区间,0.16-0.33)。与当前寻求帮助(0.14%;95%置信区间,0.10-0.20,P<0.001)相比,评估终生(0.50%;95%置信区间,0.35-0.71)的研究中估计的患病率显著更高,但在赌博参与、地区、寻求帮助的类型或数据收集年份方面,没有证据表明患病率估计存在差异。与低风险赌博者(0.27%;95%置信区间,0.07%-1.04%)相比,中风险(3.73%;95%置信区间,2.07%-6.63%)和赌博问题者(20.63%;95%置信区间,12.89%-31.35%,P<0.001)的患病率估计显著更高。

结论

每 25 名中度风险赌徒中就有 1 人,每 5 名有赌博问题的人中就有 1 人寻求过与赌博问题相关的帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/9796401/6efd8a23741e/ADD-117-2972-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/9796401/8b887e4fbe91/ADD-117-2972-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/9796401/6efd8a23741e/ADD-117-2972-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/9796401/8b887e4fbe91/ADD-117-2972-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/9796401/6efd8a23741e/ADD-117-2972-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Global prevalence of help-seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全球寻求问题赌博帮助的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):2972-2985. doi: 10.1111/add.15952. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
5
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of disordered and problem gambling.药物干预治疗障碍性及问题性赌博
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 22;9(9):CD008936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008936.pub2.
8
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
9
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8.
10
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.痴呆症的回忆疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Online Information on Gambling Addiction: Is It Readable? Is It Reliable?关于赌博成瘾的在线信息:它易懂吗?可靠吗?
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10425-8.
2
Electronic Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (e-SBIRT) for Gambling Harm: A Mixed-methods Acceptability Study.针对赌博危害的电子筛查、简短干预及转介治疗(e-SBIRT):一项混合方法可接受性研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10424-9.
3
Stigmatisation of people experiencing gambling-related harms: a vignette study of the predictors of desire for social distance.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Charting a path towards a public health approach for gambling harm prevention.规划一条通往预防赌博危害的公共卫生方法之路。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2021;29(1):37-53. doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01437-2. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Use of Self-control Strategies for Managing Gambling Habits Leads to Less Harm in Regular Gamblers.使用自我控制策略来管理赌博习惯可减少常客的伤害。
对遭受赌博相关危害者的污名化:一项关于社会距离渴望预测因素的情景研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1613798. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1613798. eCollection 2025.
4
For debate: Towards standardised data collection practices for gambling helplines.供辩论:迈向赌博求助热线标准化数据收集实践
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2025 Jun 9:14550725251341789. doi: 10.1177/14550725251341789.
5
Acceptability of the content and functionality of a just-in-time adaptive intervention for gambling problems: a mixed-methods evaluation of gambling habit hacker.即时自适应赌博问题干预措施的内容和功能可接受性:对赌博习惯黑客的混合方法评估
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Jun 5;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00573-y.
6
Demographics and help-seeking among significant others contacting the Swedish gambling helpline.联系瑞典赌博求助热线的重要他人的人口统计学特征及求助情况。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2025 Apr;42(2):184-197. doi: 10.1177/14550725251320749. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
7
Antidepressant prescription as a risk factor for developing gambling disorder: A longitudinal registry-based study in Norway.抗抑郁药处方作为发展成赌博障碍的一个风险因素:挪威一项基于登记处的纵向研究。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Feb 13;14(1):457-464. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00047. Print 2025 Mar 28.
8
The General Acceptability and Use of Smartphone App-Delivered Interventions for Gambling in Australia.澳大利亚智能手机应用程序提供的赌博干预措施的总体可接受性和使用情况。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jun;41(2):593-613. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10373-9. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
9
Predictors of Gambling Severity Among Female Gamblers: Cross-Country Study with Spanish and Italian Clinical Population.女性赌徒赌博严重程度的预测因素:针对西班牙和意大利临床人群的跨国研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10369-5.
10
Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for individuals with gambling disorder in Indonesia: protocol for a pilot and feasibility study.基于互联网的认知行为疗法治疗印度尼西亚赌博障碍个体:一项试点和可行性研究方案。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 23;13:689. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.151009.2. eCollection 2024.
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Jun;36(2):685-698. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09918-0.
4
The diagnostic accuracy of brief screening instruments for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.简短筛查工具诊断赌博问题的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Dec;74:101784. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101784. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm.赌博与公共健康:我们需要政策行动来预防危害。
BMJ. 2019 May 8;365:l1807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1807.
6
Brief interventions for problem gambling: A meta-analysis.简短干预对问题赌博的影响:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0214502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214502. eCollection 2019.
7
Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Gambling: Scoping Review.基于互联网的问题赌博干预措施:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jan 7;6(1):e65. doi: 10.2196/mental.9419.
8
Types of change strategies for limiting or reducing gambling behaviors and their perceived helpfulness: A factor analysis.限制或减少赌博行为的改变策略类型及其感知的有效性:一项因素分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Sep;32(6):679-688. doi: 10.1037/adb0000393.
9
Gamblers seeking online help are active help-seekers: Time to support autonomy and competence.寻求网络帮助的赌徒是积极的求助者:是时候支持自主和能力了。
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:272-275. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
Prevalence of gambling-related harm provides evidence for the prevention paradox.赌博相关危害的普遍性为预防悖论提供了证据。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):410-422. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.41. Epub 2018 May 23.