• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘图增强了记忆中的项目信息,但破坏了序列信息。

Drawing enhances item information but undermines sequence information in memory.

作者信息

Jonker Tanya R, Wammes Jeffrey D, MacLeod Colin M

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(4):689-699. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000610. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000610
PMID:30211591
Abstract

Drawing a picture of the referent of a word produces considerably better recall and recognition of that word than does a baseline condition, such as repeatedly writing the word, a phenomenon referred to as the drawing effect. Although the drawing effect has been the focus of much recent research, it is not yet clear what underlies the beneficial effects of drawing to memory. In 3 experiments, we explored the roles of item and order information following drawing versus silent reading and produced 2 important findings. First, the drawing effect in recall was substantially larger when the 2 conditions were intermixed in a single list compared to appearing in separate lists-in other words, drawing produced a design effect. Second, the studied order was better retained for silent reading compared to drawing in pure lists. These findings are consistent with the item-order account: Memory for the order of drawn lists is poorer because the elaborative act of drawing disrupts the encoding of interitem associations (i.e., relational information) between all list items. Thus, the selection of an encoding task should be informed by how that memory might be used in the future; if one wants to remember individual items, then an elaborative task such as drawing is recommended; if one wants to remember their sequence, it is likely better to read silently. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

绘制一个单词所指对象的图片,比起诸如反复书写该单词等基线条件,能显著提高对该单词的回忆和识别能力,这种现象被称为绘图效应。尽管绘图效应是近期诸多研究的焦点,但绘图对记忆产生有益影响的潜在原因仍不明确。在3项实验中,我们探究了绘图与默读后项目信息和顺序信息所起的作用,并得出了两项重要发现。首先,与出现在单独列表中相比,当这两种条件在单个列表中混合出现时,回忆中的绘图效应要大得多——换句话说,绘图产生了一种设计效应。其次,在纯列表中,默读比绘图能更好地保留所学习的顺序。这些发现与项目顺序理论相符:对绘图列表顺序的记忆较差,是因为绘图这一精细加工行为会干扰所有列表项目之间项目间关联(即关系信息)的编码。因此,编码任务的选择应依据未来可能如何使用该记忆来决定;如果想要记住单个项目,那么建议采用绘图等精细加工任务;如果想要记住它们的顺序,默读可能会更好。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Drawing enhances item information but undermines sequence information in memory.绘图增强了记忆中的项目信息,但破坏了序列信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(4):689-699. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000610. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
2
The drawing effect: Evidence for costs and benefits using pure and mixed lists.绘图效应:使用纯列表和混合列表的成本和收益证据。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1408-1421. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01551-6. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?长列表回忆中的产生效应:顺序无关紧要?
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):165-76. doi: 10.1037/cep0000086.
4
Not all order memory is equal: Test demands reveal dissociations in memory for sequence information.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Feb;43(2):177-188. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000301. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
5
Creating a recollection-based memory through drawing.通过绘画创建基于回忆的记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 May;44(5):734-751. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000445. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
Order information is used to guide recall of long lists: Further evidence for the item-order account.订单信息用于指导长列表的回忆:项目顺序理论的进一步证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):125-38. doi: 10.1037/cep0000088.
7
The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing.正字法独特性的奇特案例:范畴加工的破坏。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):104-13. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000160. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
8
Comparing the influence of doodling, drawing, and writing at encoding on memory.比较编码时涂鸦、绘画和书写对记忆的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;73(1):28-36. doi: 10.1037/cep0000170.
9
A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.系列回忆中的语义不匹配效应:无关言语的词汇间加工证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):515-525. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000596. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
The resilience of verbal sequence learning: Evidence from the Hebb repetition effect.言语序列学习的恢复力:来自赫布重复效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):17-25. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000566. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The drawing effect: Evidence for costs and benefits using pure and mixed lists.绘图效应:使用纯列表和混合列表的成本和收益证据。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1408-1421. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01551-6. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
2
Drawing as an efficient encoding tool in younger but not always older adults: The case of associative memory.绘画作为年轻人而非年长者有效编码工具的例证:联想记忆的情况
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan;53(1):299-324. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01503-6. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
3
Drawing your way to an A: Long-lasting improvements in classroom quiz performance following drawing.
通过绘图通向A:绘图后课堂测验成绩的持久提升。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1939-1945. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02294-2. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Task preparation as a mnemonic: The benefits of drawing (and not drawing).任务准备作为一种助记符:绘图(和不绘图)的好处。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2365-2372. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1477-y.