Suppr超能文献

长列表回忆中的产生效应:顺序无关紧要?

The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?

作者信息

Lambert Angela M, Bodner Glen E, Taikh Alexander

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary.

Department of Psychology, Western University.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):165-76. doi: 10.1037/cep0000086.

Abstract

The production effect reflects a memory advantage for words read aloud versus silently. We investigated how production influences free recall of a single long list of words. In each of 4 experiments, a production effect occurred in a mixed-list group but not across pure-list groups. When compared to the pure-list groups, the mixed-list effects typically reflected a cost to silent words rather than a benefit to aloud words. This cost persisted when participants had to perform a generation or imagery task for the silent items, ruling out a lazy reading explanation. This recall pattern challenges both distinctiveness and strength accounts, but is consistent with an item-order account. By this account, the aloud words in a mixed list disrupt the encoding of item-order information for the silent words, thus impairing silent word recall. However, item-order measures and a forced-choice order test did not provide much evidence that recall was guided by retrieval of item-order information. We discuss our pattern of results in light of another recent study of the effects of production on long-list recall. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

生成效应反映了大声朗读单词与默读单词相比所具有的记忆优势。我们研究了生成如何影响对一长串单词列表的自由回忆。在4个实验中的每一个实验里,混合列表组出现了生成效应,而纯列表组未出现。与纯列表组相比,混合列表效应通常反映出默读单词的代价而非大声朗读单词的益处。当参与者必须对默读项目执行生成或想象任务时,这种代价依然存在,排除了偷懒阅读的解释。这种回忆模式对独特性和强度解释都提出了挑战,但与项目顺序解释一致。根据这种解释,混合列表中的大声朗读单词会干扰默读单词的项目顺序信息编码,从而损害默读单词的回忆。然而,项目顺序测量和强制选择顺序测试并没有提供太多证据表明回忆是由项目顺序信息的检索所引导的。我们根据另一项最近关于生成对长列表回忆影响的研究来讨论我们的结果模式。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验