• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系列回忆中的语义不匹配效应:无关言语的词汇间加工证据。

A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.

作者信息

Röer Jan Philipp, Bell Raoul, Körner Ulrike, Buchner Axel

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy.

Department of Experimental Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):515-525. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000596. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000596
PMID:29985037
Abstract

Short-term memory (STM) for serially presented visual items is disrupted by task-irrelevant, to-be-ignored speech. Five experiments investigated the extent to which irrelevant speech is processed semantically by contrasting the following two hypotheses: (1) semantic processing of irrelevant speech is limited and does not interfere with serial STM or (2) irrelevant speech is routinely processed semantically at an interlexical level to allow for the detection of stimuli that are of potential relevance for the individual. We tested these hypotheses by comparing the disruption of serial recall by distractor sentences with semantically expected endings to that of sentences with semantically unexpected endings. Sentences with unexpected endings consistently produced more disruption than sentences with expected endings. Phonologically expected, but semantically unexpected endings had the same effect, demonstrating that a semantic and not a phonological mismatch is responsible for the increased disruption. In all five experiments, the semantic mismatch effect was not reduced after repeated exposure to sentences with unexpected endings. The results suggest that (1) semantic processing occurs at the interlexical level of irrelevant speech, which requires the integration of words into the sentence context and (2) the semantic content of a distractor interferes with the maintenance of serial information in short-term-memory if it is unexpected. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

对于按顺序呈现的视觉项目的短期记忆(STM)会受到与任务无关、需被忽略的语音的干扰。五项实验通过对比以下两种假设,研究了无关语音在语义层面上的加工程度:(1)无关语音的语义加工有限,不会干扰序列STM;(2)无关语音在词汇间层面上会常规地进行语义加工,以便检测对个体可能具有潜在相关性的刺激。我们通过比较具有语义预期结尾的干扰句和具有语义意外结尾的干扰句对序列回忆的干扰程度来检验这些假设。具有意外结尾的句子始终比具有预期结尾的句子产生更大的干扰。语音上预期但语义上意外的结尾具有相同的效果,表明是语义不匹配而非语音不匹配导致了干扰增加。在所有五项实验中,反复接触具有意外结尾的句子后,语义不匹配效应并未减弱。结果表明:(1)语义加工发生在无关语音的词汇间层面,这需要将单词整合到句子语境中;(2)如果干扰项的语义内容是意外的,那么它会干扰短期记忆中序列信息的维持。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.系列回忆中的语义不匹配效应:无关言语的词汇间加工证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):515-525. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000596. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
2
The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.语义相似性对无关言语效应的重要性。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jan;27(1):37-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03201211.
3
Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.与任务无关的言语的情感韵律会干扰序列顺序的保持。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Aug;44(8):1303-1312. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000537. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
4
Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.无关言语的语义启动。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1205-1210. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1186-3.
5
A multilingual preregistered replication of the semantic mismatch effect on serial recall.多语言预先注册的序列回忆中语义失配效应的复制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(7):966-974. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001066. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
6
Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.排练期间的同步大脑活动以及无关言语对短期记忆的干扰受回忆模式的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):188-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
7
The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.语义相关和不相关的文本提示对噪声中句子可理解性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):e16-25. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228036a.
8
Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.语义和语音对短期复述及长期线索化句子回忆的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Feb;44(2):307-29. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0554-y.
9
Proactive interference in a semantic short-term memory deficit: role of semantic and phonological relatedness.语义短期记忆缺陷中的前摄干扰:语义和语音相关性的作用。
Cortex. 2007 Jan;43(1):112-23. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70449-0.
10
Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.语义干扰的边界:优势性和词汇性在检索时起作用。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1285-301. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0438-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Attenuated processing of task-irrelevant speech and other auditory stimuli: fMRI evidence from arithmetic tasks.对与任务无关的语音及其他听觉刺激的减弱处理:来自算术任务的功能磁共振成像证据。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Dec;60(12):7124-7147. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16616. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
The Impact of Linguistic Prediction Violations on Downstream Recognition Memory and Sentence Recall.语言预测错误对下游识别记忆和句子回忆的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jan 1;36(1):1-23. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02078.
3
The Relation Between Attention and Memory.注意与记忆的关系。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;75:183-214. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-040723-012736. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
4
Read carefully, because this is important! How value-driven strategies impact sentence memory.仔细阅读,因为这很重要!价值驱动策略如何影响句子记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1511-1526. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01409-3. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Loud Auditory Distractors Are More Difficult to Ignore After All.大声的听觉干扰物更难被忽视。
Exp Psychol. 2022 May;69(3):163-171. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000554.
6
The effects of background music on neural responses during reading comprehension.背景音乐对阅读理解过程中神经反应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 29;10(1):18651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75623-3.
7
A preregistered replication and extension of the cocktail party phenomenon: One's name captures attention, unexpected words do not.鸡尾酒会现象的预先注册复制和扩展:一个人的名字会吸引注意力,意想不到的词则不会。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Feb;47(2):234-242. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000874. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
8
Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory.单词预测对识别记忆的下游行为和电生理后果
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 28;13:291. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00291. eCollection 2019.
9
Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.听觉干扰对面部记忆的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46641-7.