• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科部位感染预防临床指南质量评价:系统评价。

Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for surgical site infection prevention: A systematic review.

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203354. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0203354
PMID:30212487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6136720/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSI) occur in up to 10% of surgeries. Wound care practices to prevent infections are guided by Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs), yet their contribution to improving patient outcomes relies on their quality and adoption in practice. We critically evaluated the quality of CPGs for SSI prevention during pre-, intra- and post-operative phases of care.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature from 1990-2018 using the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, ProQuest databases and five guidelines repositories. We extracted characteristics of each guideline using purposely-developed data collection tools. We assessed overall quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool.

RESULTS

Combined searches of databases and repositories yielded 5,910 citations. Of these, we reviewed 215 full text documents. The final sample included 15 documents: 6 complete CPGs, 3 CPG updates, and 6 supplementary documents. The overall %mean scores across AGREE II domains for CPGs were: 1) scope and purpose (%mean ± SD = 86.3±23.5); 2) stakeholder involvement (%mean ± SD = 64±31.0); 3) rigour of development (%mean ± SD = 68.7±30.6); 4) clarity and presentation (%mean ± SD = 88.5±16.7); 5) applicability (%mean ± SD = 44±30.2); and, 5) editorial independence (%mean ± SD = 61±37.6). Based on individual AGREE II domains and overall scores, we appraised 4 out of 6 CPGs (inclusive of updates) as "recommended" for use in practice. Overall agreement among appraisers was excellent (ICC 0.86 [95%CI 0.73-0.94] - 0.98 [95%CI 0.96-0.99]; p <0.001).

DISCUSSION

International interest in CPG development has resulted in refinements to methodologies, which has led to improvements in the overall quality of the product.

IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSLATION

Given the domains that received the lowest scores, it is clear that we need more consumer involvement and better consideration of the implementation challenges with CPG uptake and sustainability.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率高达 10%。预防感染的伤口护理实践是由临床实践指南(CPG)指导的,但它们对改善患者预后的贡献取决于其质量和在实践中的应用。我们批判性地评估了围手术期预防 SSI 的 CPG 的质量。

方法

我们使用 Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE、ProQuest 数据库和五个指南库,从 1990 年至 2018 年系统地综述了文献。我们使用专门制定的数据收集工具提取每个指南的特征。我们使用评估研究和评估 II(AGREE II)工具评估总体质量。

结果

数据库和存储库的联合搜索产生了 5910 条引文。其中,我们审查了 215 篇全文文献。最终样本包括 15 份文件:6 份完整的 CPG、3 份 CPG 更新和 6 份补充文件。CPG 在 AGREE II 各领域的总体%mean 得分分别为:1)范围和目的(%mean ± SD = 86.3±23.5);2)利益相关者参与(%mean ± SD = 64±31.0);3)开发的严谨性(%mean ± SD = 68.7±30.6);4)清晰度和表达(%mean ± SD = 88.5±16.7);5)适用性(%mean ± SD = 44±30.2);和 5)编辑独立性(%mean ± SD = 61±37.6)。根据个别 AGREE II 领域和总体得分,我们评估了 6 份 CPG 中的 4 份(包括更新)为“推荐”在实践中使用。评估者之间的总体一致性非常好(ICC 0.86 [95%CI 0.73-0.94] - 0.98 [95%CI 0.96-0.99];p <0.001)。

讨论

国际上对 CPG 制定的兴趣导致了方法学的改进,从而提高了产品的总体质量。

对翻译的启示

鉴于得分最低的领域,显然我们需要更多的消费者参与,并更好地考虑与 CPG 采用和可持续性相关的实施挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147a/6136720/651b3fac0fbb/pone.0203354.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147a/6136720/14b11d83f6e3/pone.0203354.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147a/6136720/651b3fac0fbb/pone.0203354.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147a/6136720/14b11d83f6e3/pone.0203354.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147a/6136720/651b3fac0fbb/pone.0203354.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for surgical site infection prevention: A systematic review.外科部位感染预防临床指南质量评价:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203354. eCollection 2018.
2
Appraising the quality of clinical practice guidelines in traditional Chinese medicine using AGREE II instrument: A systematic review.使用AGREE II工具评估中医临床实践指南的质量:一项系统评价。
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 May;71(5). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12931. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
3
Nutrition in critically ill adults: A systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines.危重症成年患者的营养:临床实践指南的系统质量评估
Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;35(6):1219-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
Critical Appraisal of International Clinical Practice Guidelines in Kidney Transplantation Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Education II Tool: A Systematic Review.使用评估研究和教育指南 II 工具对肾移植国际临床实践指南进行批判性评估:系统评价。
Transplantation. 2018 Sep;102(9):1419-1439. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002255.
5
Quality of stroke rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines.中风康复临床实践指南的质量
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):657-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00708.x.
6
Quality of clinical practice guidelines for gestational and congenital toxoplasmosis: A systematic review of the literature.妊娠期和先天性弓形虫病临床实践指南的质量:文献系统评价
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;28(2):218-224. doi: 10.1111/jep.13612. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
7
Quality of Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Overview Study of AGREE II Appraisals.康复临床实践指南质量:AGREE II 评估概述研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;101(9):1643-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.022. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and management of low back pain: A systematic review of quantity and quality.临床实践指南:腰痛的治疗和管理,系统评价数量和质量。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Feb;51:102295. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102295. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
9
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on treatments for oral cancer.口腔癌治疗临床实践指南的质量评估。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Apr;65:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
10
The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies.过去二十年临床实践指南的质量:指南评估研究的系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e58. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.042077.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical evaluation of adults undergoing elective surgery utilizing intraoperative incisional wound irrigation (CLEAN Wound): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.采用术中切口冲洗对择期手术成年患者进行的临床评估(清洁伤口):一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e104375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104375.
2
Global View of Clinical Guidelines on Prevention of Surgical Site Infections for Health Care Professionals: A Scoping Review.面向医疗保健专业人员的手术部位感染预防临床指南全球视野:一项范围综述
Rwanda J Med Health Sci. 2023 Nov 30;6(3):398-410. doi: 10.4314/rjmhs.v6i3.13. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Executive Summary of the American College of Surgeons/Surgical Infection Society Surgical Site Infection Guidelines-2016 Update.美国外科医师学会/外科感染学会《手术部位感染指南(2016年更新版)》执行摘要
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 May/Jun;18(4):379-382. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.214.
2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.美国疾病预防控制中心 2017 年《手术部位感染预防指南》。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.
3
Economic case for intraoperative interventions to prevent surgical-site infection.
Perioperative patient safety recommendations: systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.
围手术期患者安全建议:临床实践指南的系统评价
BJS Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae143.
4
Clinicians' and Patients' Experiences and Perceptions on the Prevention and Management of Surgical Site Infections: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.临床医生和患者对外科手术部位感染预防与管理的经验及认知:一项混合方法的系统评价
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jan;34(1):24-48. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17443. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
Laminar airflow ventilation systems in orthopaedic operating room do not prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.层流通风系统在骨科手术室并不能预防手术部位感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 5;18(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03992-2.
6
The Quality and Clinical Applicability of Recommendations in Ostomy Guidelines: A Systematic Review.造口术指南中推荐意见的质量与临床适用性:一项系统评价
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Aug 9;15:1517-1529. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S378684. eCollection 2022.
7
Guidelines, guidelines and more guidelines for haemorrhoid treatment: A review to sort the wheat from the chaff.痔病治疗的指南、指南,还是指南:去芜存菁的综述。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jun;24(6):764-772. doi: 10.1111/codi.16078. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
Evidence-based nutrition guidelines for cancer survivors in Europe: a call for action.欧洲癌症幸存者的循证营养指南:行动呼吁。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jun;76(6):819-826. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-01036-8. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
9
Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.髋关节和膝关节置换术患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的临床指南质量评价:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e040686. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040686.
10
Wound care practices across two acute care settings: A comparative study.两个急症护理环境中的伤口护理实践:一项比较研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):831-839. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15135. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
预防手术部位感染的术中干预的经济案例。
Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e55-e64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10428.
4
Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.世界各地医疗服务过度使用的证据。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):156-168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
5
The Science of Choosing Wisely--Overcoming the Therapeutic Illusion.明智选择的科学——克服治疗错觉
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 31;374(13):1203-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1516803.
6
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权:推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
Lung cancer screening: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.肺癌筛查:临床实践指南的系统评价
Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Jan;70(1):20-30. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12744. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
8
Reducing the risk of surgical site infection using a multidisciplinary approach: an integrative review.采用多学科方法降低手术部位感染风险:一项综合综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015 Oct 13;8:473-87. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S73565. eCollection 2015.
9
A Systematic Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.使用研究与评价指南II(AGREE II)工具对青少年特发性关节炎临床实践指南进行系统的批判性评价。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 10;10(9):e0137180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137180. eCollection 2015.
10
Evidence-Based Care of Acute Wounds: A Perspective.急性伤口的循证护理:一种观点
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015 May 1;4(5):286-294. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0592.