Suppr超能文献

门诊护理敏感状况的入院率:一般人群和 COPD 人群中的全国观察性研究。

Admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a national observational study in the general and COPD population.

机构信息

National Healthcare Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;29(2):213-219. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky182.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) may be prevented by effective ambulatory management and treatment. ACSC admissions is used as indicator for primary care quality and accessibility. However, debate continues to which extent these admissions are truly preventable. The aim of this study was to provide more objective insight into the preventability of ACSC admissions.

METHODS

Observational study using 2012-15 health insurer claim data of 13 182 602 Dutch insured inhabitants. Logistic multilevel regression analyses were conducted to investigate factors (ambulatory care and characteristics of inhabitants) possibly associated with ACSC admissions. Prior ambulatory care use was examined for patients with an ACSC contributing to the highest number of ACSC admissions: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

RESULTS

In 2014, 89.8 hospital admissions for ACSCs per 10 000 insured inhabitants were claimed. Percentage of inhabitants with ACSC admissions varied between general practices from 0.58-0.84%. ASCS admissions were hardly associated with ambulatory care. One month prior to admission, 97% of admitted COPD patients had at least one ambulatory care contact.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in ACSC admissions between general practitioners was observed, indicating that certain hospital admissions may be prevented. However, we found no indication that ACSC admissions were preventable, as no link was found with the provision of ambulatory care and ACSC admissions. This may indicate that this indicator is country and health care system specific. Before including ACSC admission as quality indicator of primary care in the Netherlands, more insight into the causes of variation is required.

摘要

背景

通过有效的门诊管理和治疗,可以预防因门诊护理敏感条件(ACSCs)而住院。ACSC 的住院率被用作初级保健质量和可及性的指标。然而,对于这些住院治疗在多大程度上是真正可预防的,仍存在争议。本研究旨在更客观地了解 ACSC 住院治疗的可预防程度。

方法

使用荷兰 2012-2015 年健康保险公司索赔数据对 13182602 名荷兰参保居民进行了一项观察性研究。采用逻辑多层回归分析,调查可能与 ACSC 住院治疗相关的因素(门诊护理和居民特征)。对 COPD 患者的门诊护理使用情况进行了研究,因为 COPD 是导致 ACSC 住院人数最多的 ACSC 之一。

结果

2014 年,每 10000 名参保居民中有 89.8 例因 ACSC 住院。各全科医生的 ACSC 住院率从 0.58%到 0.84%不等。ACSC 住院率与门诊护理几乎没有关联。在入院前一个月,97%的住院 COPD 患者至少有一次门诊护理接触。

结论

观察到全科医生之间的 ACSC 住院率存在差异,这表明某些住院治疗可能是可以预防的。然而,我们没有发现 ACSC 住院治疗是可以预防的迹象,因为没有发现与门诊护理和 ACSC 住院治疗之间存在关联。这可能表明该指标具有国家和医疗保健系统的特异性。在荷兰将 ACSC 住院作为初级保健质量指标纳入之前,需要进一步深入了解差异的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02d4/6426039/c5b01a25709f/cky182f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验