Center for Research on Ethical, Legal & Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic & Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Genet Med. 2019 Apr;21(4):994-1000. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0275-2. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
Adolescents increasingly need to be "genomics literate," and may engage more with video educational formats than traditional written formats. We conducted a pilot study to assess and compare the impact of two modes of education about genome sequencing (GS) on adolescents' genomic knowledge and genomic-related decisions.
Using an online survey, 43 adolescents ages 14-17 years were randomly assigned to watch a video or read a pamphlet about GS. Measures included pre- and postintervention assessment of genomic knowledge, perceived utility of these materials for decisions about participating in genetic research, interest in receiving GS results, and overall satisfaction with these materials. Analyses described results for all participants and compared results between intervention groups.
Self-reported genomic knowledge increased overall (p < 0.001). Postintervention knowledge about GS limitations was higher among video group than pamphlet group participants (p = 0.038). More video group than pamphlet group participants expressed satisfaction with the material's understandability (45% vs. 29%) and suitability (91% vs. 76%). Interest in receiving personal GS results was significantly associated with being female (p = 0.01) and younger (14-15 years vs. 16-17 years) (p = 0.002).
A video format may be preferable for increasing genomic literacy among adolescents. Further research with adolescents is needed to better understand how gender and age may impact genomic decisions and preferences.
青少年越来越需要“具备基因组学素养”,他们可能比传统的书面格式更愿意接受视频教育形式。我们进行了一项试点研究,以评估和比较两种关于基因组测序 (GS) 的教育模式对青少年基因组知识和与基因组相关决策的影响。
使用在线调查,将 43 名 14-17 岁的青少年随机分配观看关于 GS 的视频或阅读小册子。评估指标包括基因组知识的干预前后评估、对这些材料用于遗传研究决策的感知效用、对接收 GS 结果的兴趣以及对这些材料的总体满意度。分析描述了所有参与者的结果,并比较了干预组之间的结果。
自我报告的基因组知识总体上有所提高(p<0.001)。与阅读小册子组的参与者相比,观看视频组的参与者对 GS 局限性的了解更高(p=0.038)。与阅读小册子组的参与者相比,更多观看视频组的参与者对材料的易懂性(45%比 29%)和适用性(91%比 76%)表示满意。对接收个人 GS 结果的兴趣与女性(p=0.01)和年龄较小(14-15 岁比 16-17 岁)(p=0.002)显著相关。
视频格式可能更适合提高青少年的基因组素养。需要对青少年进行进一步研究,以更好地了解性别和年龄如何影响基因组决策和偏好。