• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[强制约束措施的使用频率能否作为精神病医院的一项质量指标?]

[Frequency of coercive measures as a quality indicator for psychiatric hospitals?].

作者信息

Steinert T, Flammer E

机构信息

Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I der Universität Ulm, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg-Weissenau, Deutschland.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2019 Jan;90(1):35-39. doi: 10.1007/s00115-018-0611-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00115-018-0611-4
PMID:30215134
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The percentage of patients subjected to coercive measures has been proposed as 1 of 10 quality indicators for psychiatric inpatient treatment by the German Association of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN). Internationally, there are similar recommendations and corresponding reporting systems.

METHODS

The registry of coercive measures of psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Württemberg that was established in 2015, yields the possibility to examine the appropriateness of this indicator, based on raw data of 108,863 cases in 2016. This study investigated how the indicator is influenced by patient variables and characteristics of hospital structure.

RESULTS

The percentage of cases exposed to coercive measures was strongly (r = 0.6) correlated with the percentage of involuntarily treated cases. With respect to the latter, hospitals varied widely with a range from 0.7% up to 24.1%. Specialized wards serving patients outside the catchment area with a high number of coercive measures also had a strong influence on the results of a benchmarking comparison.

CONCLUSION

The indicator is a good instrument for longitudinal evaluation of an institution; however, due to a high number of known and unknown confounding factors, it is inappropriate for the purpose of comparing psychiatric hospitals.

摘要

背景

德国精神科、心理治疗与身心医学协会(DGPPN)已提议将接受强制治疗措施的患者比例作为精神科住院治疗的10项质量指标之一。在国际上,也有类似的建议和相应的报告系统。

方法

巴登-符腾堡州精神科医院强制治疗措施登记册于2015年建立,基于2016年108,863例病例的原始数据,有机会检验该指标的适用性。本研究调查了该指标如何受到患者变量和医院结构特征的影响。

结果

接受强制治疗措施的病例百分比与非自愿治疗病例的百分比密切相关(r = 0.6)。就后者而言,医院之间差异很大,范围从0.7%到24.1%。为集水区以外患者服务且采取大量强制治疗措施的专科病房,对基准比较结果也有很大影响。

结论

该指标是对一个机构进行纵向评估的良好工具;然而,由于存在大量已知和未知的混杂因素,它不适用于精神科医院之间的比较。

相似文献

1
[Frequency of coercive measures as a quality indicator for psychiatric hospitals?].[强制约束措施的使用频率能否作为精神病医院的一项质量指标?]
Nervenarzt. 2019 Jan;90(1):35-39. doi: 10.1007/s00115-018-0611-4.
2
[Recording and reducing coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].[精神病院强制措施的记录与减少]
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 Nov;31 Suppl 1:S18-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828420.
3
[Incidence of coercive measures as an indicator of quality in psychiatric hospitals. Problems of data recording and processing, preliminary results of a benchmarking study].[作为精神病医院质量指标的强制措施发生率。数据记录与处理问题,一项基准研究的初步结果]
Psychiatr Prax. 2007 Jan;34(1):26-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866920. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
4
[Benchmarking of freedom-restricting coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].[精神病院限制自由强制措施的基准评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
5
[Coercive measures in German hospitals for psychiatry and psychotherapy : A pilot study by the DGPPN to evaluate a uniform assessment instrument].[德国医院精神科和心理治疗科的强制手段:德国精神科和心理治疗协会评估统一评估工具的一项试点研究]
Nervenarzt. 2017 Jul;88(7):802-810. doi: 10.1007/s00115-016-0261-3.
6
Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.监测强制性措施使用情况的方法学问题。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
7
Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.强制措施的临床病程及流行率:一项针对非自愿住院精神科患者的观察性研究
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Apr 26;148:w14616. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14616. eCollection 2018.
8
[Effects of the Decision of the German Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint in 2018 : Coercive measures in the psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg in 2019 compared to the years 2015-2017].[德国宪法法院2018年裁决对机械约束的影响:2019年巴登-符腾堡州精神病院的强制措施与2015 - 2017年的比较]
Nervenarzt. 2022 Jul;93(7):706-712. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01267-5. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
[Coercive measures in psychiatric clinics in Germany: current practice (2012)].[德国精神病诊所的强制手段:当前实践(2012年)]
Nervenarzt. 2014 May;85(5):621-9. doi: 10.1007/s00115-013-3867-8.
10
Reduction of coercive measures under routine conditions in psychiatric hospitals 2004-2019: Strong effects in old age psychiatry, much less in general psychiatry.2004-2019 年常规情况下精神病院强制性措施的减少:老年精神病学影响较大,一般精神病学影响较小。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 20;63(1):e102. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.104.

引用本文的文献

1
[Implementation of an Open Door Policy on Two Acute Care Units].[两个急症护理单元实施开放政策]
Psychiatr Prax. 2024 Sep;51(6):300-306. doi: 10.1055/a-2296-0327. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
2
[Cantonal Differences in The Implementation of Involuntary Admission in Switzerland].[瑞士非自愿入院实施中的州差异]
Psychiatr Prax. 2024 Jan;51(1):24-30. doi: 10.1055/a-2133-4084. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
3
Preventing, reducing, and attenuating restraint: A prospective controlled trial of the implementation of peer support in acute psychiatry.

本文引用的文献

1
[The Case Register for Coercive Measures According to the Law on Assistance for Persons with Mental Diseases of Baden-Wuerttemberg: Conception and First Evaluation].[巴登-符腾堡州《精神疾病患者救助法》强制医疗措施病例登记册:构想与首次评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 2019 Mar;46(2):82-89. doi: 10.1055/a-0665-6728. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
2
Variation in compulsory psychiatric inpatient admission in England: a cross-classified, multilevel analysis.英格兰强制精神科住院治疗的差异:一项交叉分类的多层次分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;4(8):619-626. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30207-9. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
3
[DGPPN recommendations on quality indicators for schizophrenia].
预防、减少和减轻约束:急性精神病学中实施同伴支持的前瞻性对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 7;14:1089484. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1089484. eCollection 2023.
4
[Monitoring of coercive measures and compulsory treatment in Germany].[德国的强制措施与强制治疗监测]
Nervenarzt. 2022 Nov;93(11):1105-1111. doi: 10.1007/s00115-022-01349-4. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
5
Evaluation of coercive measures in different psychiatric hospitals: the impact of institutional characteristics.不同精神病院强制性措施的评估:机构特征的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03410-z.
6
Implementation of Guidelines on Prevention of Coercion and Violence (PreVCo) in Psychiatry: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).《精神科预防胁迫与暴力指南(PreVCo)》的实施:一项随机对照试验(RCT)的研究方案
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 15;11:579176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.579176. eCollection 2020.
7
Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.法医精神病学中的自由限制与强制手段
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 5;11:146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00146. eCollection 2020.
[精神分裂症质量指标的双相障碍工作组建议]
Nervenarzt. 2017 Jul;88(7):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s00115-017-0347-6.
4
Seclusion Reduction in Dutch Mental Health Care: Did Hospitals Meet Goals?荷兰精神卫生保健中隔离措施的减少:医院是否达成目标?
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Dec 1;67(12):1321-1327. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500414. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
5
Rates of voluntary and compulsory psychiatric in-patient treatment in England: an ecological study investigating associations with deprivation and demographics.英格兰自愿和强制精神病住院治疗率:一项考察与贫困和人口统计学因素关联的生态学研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;209(2):157-61. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.171009. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
6
Comparison of restraint data from four countries.来自四个国家的约束数据比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;51(9):1301-9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1203-x. Epub 2016 May 4.
7
Impact of social-psychiatric services and psychiatric clinics on involuntary admissions.社会精神科服务和精神科诊所对非自愿入院的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;60(7):672-80. doi: 10.1177/0020764013511794. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
8
[Developmental process of DGPPN quality indicators].[二酰甘油焦磷酸神经酰胺质量指标的发育过程]
Nervenarzt. 2013 Mar;84(3):350-65. doi: 10.1007/s00115-012-3705-4.
9
[Benchmarking of freedom-restricting coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].[精神病院限制自由强制措施的基准评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
10
[Incidence of coercive measures as an indicator of quality in psychiatric hospitals. Problems of data recording and processing, preliminary results of a benchmarking study].[作为精神病医院质量指标的强制措施发生率。数据记录与处理问题,一项基准研究的初步结果]
Psychiatr Prax. 2007 Jan;34(1):26-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866920. Epub 2006 Nov 15.