Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Nov;45(11):1319-1325. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13012. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
To examine an organoleptic scoring method (OLS) whereby the sample is collected by negative pressure in a syringe and is subsequently smelled and rated away from the patient.
Data of 476 patients visiting a specialized halitosis clinic in Leuven (Belgium) were reviewed retrospectively. Organoleptic (with the classic and with the negative-pressure method) and instrumental (with the Halimeter® and OralChroma ) ratings of breath odour were retrieved from patient files together with the final diagnosis. The correlations between the different methods were examined (Spearman correlation coefficient) as well as the positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity of all methods.
Both methods of OLS correlated similarly with the instrumental measurements (Halimeter® and OralChroma ). Analysis of PPV, NPV, sensitivity and specificity of both methods of examination showed that the negative-pressure method performed best.
The negative-pressure method is a valid method for organoleptic scoring of the breath odour and performs as good as the classic organoleptic method.
研究一种嗅觉评分方法(OLS),通过该方法,样本可以通过注射器的负压收集,然后在远离患者的地方进行嗅闻和评分。
回顾性分析了 476 名在比利时鲁汶专门口臭诊所就诊的患者的数据。从患者档案中检索了嗅觉(经典法和负压法)和仪器(Halimeter® 和 OralChroma)评分以及最终诊断。检查了不同方法之间的相关性(Spearman 相关系数),以及所有方法的阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、灵敏度和特异性。
两种 OLS 方法与仪器测量(Halimeter® 和 OralChroma)均具有相似的相关性。两种检查方法的 PPV、NPV、灵敏度和特异性分析表明,负压法的性能最佳。
负压法是一种有效的嗅觉评分方法,与经典嗅觉法一样有效。