• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析伊朗、中国和英国文化对遗憾和风险的影响。

Parsing cultural impacts on regret and risk in Iran, China and the United Kingdom.

机构信息

School of psychological and cognitive sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 14;8(1):13862. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30680-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-30680-7
PMID:30217982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6138714/
Abstract

Value-based choices are influenced both by powerful counterfactuals, such as regret, and also by risk in potential outcomes. Culture can profoundly affect how humans perceive and act in the world, but it remains unknown how regret in value-based choice and key aspects of risk-taking may differ between cultures. Here our computational approach provides precise and independent metrics, grounded in extensive neurobiological evidence, for the influences of risk and regret on choice. We test for commonalities and differences across three diverse cultures: Iran, China and the UK. Including Iran matters because cross-cultural work on value-based choice is lacking for this key 21 Century culture, and also because patterns across the three cultures arbitrates between explanations for differences. We find commonalities, with regret influencing choice across cultures and no consistent cultural difference seen. However, for risk, unlike in both Chinese and Westerners' choices, Iranians are risk-seeking - findings consistent across two task variants and further explained by Iranians showing less subjective impact of negative, but not positive, outcomes of risky choices. Our computational approach dissects cultural impacts on two key neurobiologically-grounded quantities in value-based choice, showing that neuroscientific accounts cannot a priori isolate such quantities from culture in the cognitive processes underlying choice.

摘要

基于价值的选择既受到强大的反事实(例如遗憾)的影响,也受到潜在结果风险的影响。文化可以深刻地影响人类对世界的感知和行为方式,但人们尚不清楚基于价值的选择中的遗憾以及冒险的关键方面在不同文化之间可能会有何不同。在这里,我们的计算方法为风险和遗憾对选择的影响提供了精确且独立的指标,这些指标基于广泛的神经生物学证据。我们在三个不同的文化(伊朗、中国和英国)中进行了测试。包括伊朗很重要,因为针对这一关键的 21 世纪文化,基于价值的选择的跨文化工作还很缺乏,而且这三种文化之间的模式也可以为差异的解释提供依据。我们发现存在一些共同点,遗憾会影响不同文化中的选择,而且没有观察到一致的文化差异。然而,对于风险,与中国人和西方人不同,伊朗人是风险寻求者,这一发现与两种任务变体一致,并且进一步解释为伊朗人对风险选择的负面结果而非正面结果的主观影响较小。我们的计算方法剖析了文化对基于价值的选择中两个关键神经生物学基础数量的影响,表明神经科学解释不能先验地将这些数量与认知过程中的文化隔离开来,而认知过程是选择的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/766197ad281e/41598_2018_30680_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/41de608d63de/41598_2018_30680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/fa76a485b470/41598_2018_30680_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/b977932422a5/41598_2018_30680_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/766197ad281e/41598_2018_30680_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/41de608d63de/41598_2018_30680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/fa76a485b470/41598_2018_30680_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/b977932422a5/41598_2018_30680_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa30/6138714/766197ad281e/41598_2018_30680_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Parsing cultural impacts on regret and risk in Iran, China and the United Kingdom.解析伊朗、中国和英国文化对遗憾和风险的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 14;8(1):13862. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30680-7.
2
Learning from other people's experience: a neuroimaging study of decisional interactive-learning.从他人的经验中学习:决策互动学习的神经影像学研究。
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 1;55(1):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.065. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
3
Regret-Based Decision-Making Style Acts as a Dispositional Factor in Risky Choices.基于后悔的决策风格是风险选择中的一个性格因素。
Psychol Rep. 2019 Aug;122(4):1412-1431. doi: 10.1177/0033294118786687. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
4
Confidence and risky decision-making in gambling disorder.赌博障碍中的自信与冒险决策。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Aug 21;12(3):840-846. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00041. Print 2023 Oct 5.
5
What might have been? The role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and lateral orbitofrontal cortex in counterfactual emotions and choice.可能是什么?腹内侧前额叶皮质和外侧眶额皮质在反事实情绪和选择中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Feb;54:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.026. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
6
To do or not to do: desirability and consistency mediate judgements of regret.做还是不做:可取性和一致性影响后悔判断。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jun;80(6):861-70.
7
Waves of regret: a meg study of emotion and decision-making.悔恨之浪:一项关于情感和决策的荟萃研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(1):38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
8
Knowing when to hold 'em: regret and the relation between missed opportunities and risk taking in children, adolescents and adults.懂得何时该坚持:后悔以及儿童、青少年和成年人中错失机会与冒险行为之间的关系。
Cogn Emot. 2018 May;32(3):608-615. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1326373. Epub 2017 May 13.
9
The role of anticipated regret in choosing for others.预期后悔在代际决策中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 15;11(1):12557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91635-z.
10
The development of regret and relief about the outcomes of risky decisions.对冒险决策结果的后悔与宽慰情绪的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Aug;148:1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of anticipated regret in choosing for others.预期后悔在代际决策中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 15;11(1):12557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91635-z.
2
Joining a group diverts regret and responsibility away from the individual.加入一个群体可以将遗憾和责任从个人身上转移开。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 11;287(1922):20192251. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2251.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral contagion during learning about another agent's risk-preferences acts on the neural representation of decision-risk.在了解另一个体的风险偏好过程中的行为传染作用于决策风险的神经表征。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 5;113(14):3755-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600092113. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
2
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
3
Generality and cultural variation in the experience of regret.
遗憾体验的普遍性和文化变异性。
Emotion. 2014 Dec;14(6):1037-48. doi: 10.1037/a0038221. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
4
Dissociable influences of skewness and valence on economic choice and neural activity.偏度和效价对经济选择和神经活动的可分离影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e83454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083454. eCollection 2013.
5
War's enduring effects on the development of egalitarian motivations and in-group biases.战争对平等主义动机和内群体偏见发展的持久影响。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):47-57. doi: 10.1177/0956797613493444. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Distinct encoding of risk and value in economic choice between multiple risky options.在多种风险选择的经济决策中对风险和价值的不同编码。
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.023. Epub 2013 May 16.
7
Approach-avoidance processes contribute to dissociable impacts of risk and loss on choice.趋近-回避过程导致风险和损失对选择的可分离影响。
J Neurosci. 2012 May 16;32(20):7009-20. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0049-12.2012.
8
Cultural grounding of regret: regret in self and interpersonal contexts.文化根源的遗憾:遗憾在自我和人际关系的背景下。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Sep;25(6):1121-30. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.516962. Epub 2011 May 24.
9
Deconstructing risk: separable encoding of variance and skewness in the brain.解构风险:大脑中方差和偏度的可分离编码。
Neuroimage. 2011 Oct 15;58(4):1139-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.087. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
Action dominates valence in anticipatory representations in the human striatum and dopaminergic midbrain.在人类纹状体和多巴胺能中脑中,动作主导预期反应的效价。
J Neurosci. 2011 May 25;31(21):7867-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6376-10.2011.