Suppr超能文献

系统文献复习:乳糜泻的经济负担

Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Burden of Celiac Disease.

机构信息

ZS Associates, 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100, New York, NY, 10018, USA.

Takeda Development Centre Europe, London, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jan;37(1):45-61. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0707-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) has rapidly increased over recent decades, but costs related to CD remain poorly quantified.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review assessed the economic burden of CD in North America and Europe.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify English-language literature from 2007 to 2018 that assessed costs, cost effectiveness, and health resource utilization for CD.

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 28 (57.1%) addressed costs of testing and diagnosis; 33 (67.3%) were from Europe. The cost per positive CD diagnosis of testing patients already undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy for other indications ranged from 1300 Canadian dollars ($Can) in Canada (2016 value) to €44,712 in the Netherlands (2013 value). Adding the CD test was cost effective when it combined diagnostic modalities (e.g., serology and biopsy). Direct annual excess costs to a US payer per diagnosed CD patient totaled $US6000 (2013 value) more than for a person without CD, chiefly due to outpatient care. Hospitalizations, emergency visits, and medication use were more common with CD. After initiating a gluten-free diet (GFD), patients visited primary care providers less often, used more medications, and missed fewer days from school and work.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the few available economic studies of CD assess testing and diagnosis costs, especially in Europe. Methods of testing generally are considered cost effective when they combine diagnostic modalities in symptomatic patients. Most costs to a payer of managing CD derive from outpatient care. Following GFD initiation, patients lose fewer days from work and school than pretreatment.

摘要

背景

近几十年来,乳糜泻(CD)的患病率迅速上升,但与 CD 相关的成本仍未得到充分量化。

目的

本系统评价评估了北美和欧洲 CD 的经济负担。

方法

系统检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、EconLit 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,以确定 2007 年至 2018 年评估 CD 成本、成本效益和卫生资源利用的英语文献。

结果

49 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 28 项(57.1%)评估了检测和诊断的成本;33 项(67.3%)来自欧洲。对于已经因其他原因接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查的患者进行 CD 检测的阳性 CD 诊断的每个病例的检测成本,从加拿大(2016 年价值)的 1300 加元(加元)到荷兰(2013 年价值)的 44712 欧元不等。当将 CD 检测与诊断方式(如血清学和活检)相结合时,添加该检测具有成本效益。与没有 CD 的人相比,美国支付方每确诊一名 CD 患者的年直接超额费用增加了 6000 美元(2013 年价值),主要是由于门诊护理。CD 患者更常住院、急诊就诊和使用药物。开始无麸质饮食(GFD)后,患者就诊初级保健提供者的频率降低,使用的药物更多,并且从工作和学校缺勤的天数减少。

结论

为数不多的 CD 经济研究大多评估了检测和诊断成本,尤其是在欧洲。当针对有症状的患者结合诊断方式时,大多数检测方法被认为具有成本效益。管理 CD 的支付方的大部分成本来自门诊护理。开始 GFD 治疗后,患者比治疗前缺勤的天数更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验