Sideri Sofia, Marcenes Wagner, Stansfeld Stephen A, Bernabé Eduardo
Dental Public Health, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas Hospitals, London, UK.
Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Dent Traumatol. 2018 Dec;34(6):438-444. doi: 10.1111/edt.12442. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: No comprehensive assessment of the influence of the home environment on traumatic dental injuries (TDI) has been conducted to date. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between family environment and TDI among adolescents from East London.
This cross-sectional study used data from 646 adolescents who participated in phase III of the Research with East London Adolescents Community Health Survey (RELACHS). Family environment was measured with four indicators (non-nuclear family, discordant parental relationship and levels of parental support and parental punishment) measured through a self-administered questionnaire. Clinical examinations were performed for TDI, overjet and lip coverage. Logistic regression was used to test the crude and adjusted (controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors) association of each family environment characteristic with TDI prevalence.
Twenty-nine percent of adolescents were from non-nuclear families, and 52.3% reported a discordant parental relationship. The mean score for parental support was -0.01 (SD: 0.90, range: -0.11 to 0.08), and the mean parental punishment score was 0.03 (SD: 0.86, range: -0.04 to 0.10). Adolescents from non-nuclear families had 1.63 (95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.53) greater odds of having TDI than those from nuclear families. However, this association was fully attenuated after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. The other three indicators of family environment were not associated with TDI either in crude or adjusted regression models.
This study found weak evidence of an association between family environment and TDI.
背景/目的:迄今为止,尚未对家庭环境对外伤性牙损伤(TDI)的影响进行全面评估。本研究的目的是探讨东伦敦青少年家庭环境与TDI之间的关系。
这项横断面研究使用了646名青少年的数据,这些青少年参与了东伦敦青少年社区健康调查(RELACHS)的第三阶段。通过自我管理问卷测量家庭环境的四个指标(非核心家庭、父母关系不和谐以及父母支持和父母惩罚水平)。对外伤性牙损伤、覆盖超 牙合 和唇覆盖进行临床检查。使用逻辑回归来检验每个家庭环境特征与TDI患病率的粗略关联和调整后关联(控制社会人口统计学和临床因素)。
29%的青少年来自非核心家庭,52.3%报告父母关系不和谐。父母支持的平均得分为-0.01(标准差:0.90,范围:-0.11至0.08),父母惩罚的平均得分为0.03(标准差:0.86,范围:-0.04至0.10)。来自非核心家庭的青少年发生TDI的几率比来自核心家庭的青少年高1.63倍(95%置信区间:1.06-2.53)。然而,在调整社会人口统计学和临床因素后,这种关联完全减弱。家庭环境的其他三个指标在粗略或调整后的回归模型中均与TDI无关。
本研究发现家庭环境与TDI之间关联的证据较弱。