Suppr超能文献

使用传统和先进技术提取大麻(Cannabis sativa)精油的比较研究。

A Comparative Study on Hemp (Cannabis sativa) Essential Oil Extraction Using Traditional and Advanced Techniques.

作者信息

naz Saima, Hanif Muhammad Asif, Ansari Tariq Mahmood, Al-Sabahi Jamal Nasar

出版信息

Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2017 Jan;37(1):306-11.

Abstract

A comparative study of Cannabis sativa (Hemp) essential constituents obtained by using Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SCFE), Steam Distillation (SD) and Hydrodistillation (HD) is presented here. The optimized extraction temperatures were 130,110 and 50 ℃ for hydrodistillation, steam distillation and supercritical fluid extraction respectively. The essential oil of C. sativa was analyzed by using Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A total of 33, 30 and 31 components have been identified in HD, SD and SCFE respectively. Yield of essential oil using SCFE (0.039%) was more than HD (0.025%) and SD (0.035%) extraction respectively. The main component of sesquiterpenes obtained by hydrodistillation at 130 ℃ with their percentages included caryophyllene (40.58%), trans-α-bergamotene (5.41%), humulene (10.97%), cis-β-farnesene (8.53%) and monoterpenes included α-pinene (2.13%), d-limonene (6.46%), p-cymol (0.65%) and cineole (2.58%) respectively. The main component of sesquiterpenes obtained by SD steam distillation at 110 ℃ including caryophyllene (38.60%) trans-α-bergamotene (4.22%), humulene (10.26%), cis-β-farnesene (6.67%) and monoterpenes included α-pinene (3.21%), d-limonene (7.07%), p-cymol (2.59%) and cineole (3.88%) whereas the more percentages of major components were obtained by SCFE at 50 ℃ included caryophyllene (44.31%), trans-α-bergamotene (6.79%), humulene (11.97%) cis-β-farnesene (9.71%) and monoterpenes included α-pinene (0.45%), d-limonene (2.13%) p-cymol (0.19%) and cineole (1.38 %) respectively. We found yield/efficiency, chemical composition, quality of the essential oils by supercritical fluid extraction superior in terms of modern, green, saving energy and a rapid approach as compared to traditional techniques.

摘要

本文介绍了一项关于采用超临界流体萃取(SCFE)、水蒸气蒸馏(SD)和水蒸馏(HD)法获取的大麻(麻类植物)主要成分的对比研究。水蒸馏、水蒸气蒸馏和超临界流体萃取的优化萃取温度分别为130℃、110℃和50℃。采用气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(GC-MS)对大麻的精油进行分析。在水蒸馏、水蒸气蒸馏和超临界流体萃取中分别鉴定出了33种、30种和31种成分。超临界流体萃取法的精油产率(0.039%)分别高于水蒸馏法(0.025%)和水蒸气蒸馏法(0.035%)。130℃水蒸馏法得到的倍半萜类主要成分及其百分比包括石竹烯(40.58%)、反式-α-佛手柑油烯(5.41%)、蛇麻烯(10.97%)、顺式-β-法呢烯(8.53%),单萜类包括α-蒎烯(2.13%)、d-柠檬烯(6.46%)、对伞花烃(0.65%)和桉叶素(2.58%)。110℃水蒸气蒸馏法得到的倍半萜类主要成分包括石竹烯(38.60%)、反式-α-佛手柑油烯(4.22%)、蛇麻烯(10.26%)、顺式-β-法呢烯(6.67%),单萜类包括α-蒎烯(3.21%)、d-柠檬烯(7.07%)、对伞花烃(2.59%)和桉叶素(3.88%),而50℃超临界流体萃取法得到的主要成分百分比更高,包括石竹烯(44.31%)、反式-α-佛手柑油烯(6.79%)、蛇麻烯(11.97%)、顺式-β-法呢烯(9.71%),单萜类包括α-蒎烯(0.45%)、d-柠檬烯(2.13%)、对伞花烃(0.19%)和桉叶素(1.38%)。我们发现,与传统技术相比,超临界流体萃取法在精油的产率/效率、化学成分、质量方面具有现代、绿色、节能和快速的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验