General Psychology: Cognition, University of Duisburg-Essen.
Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Michigan State University.
Health Commun. 2019 Nov;34(13):1653-1662. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1517636. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
Physician rating websites allow users to check physicians' profiles, write reviews, or rate their performance. The opinion of other users regarding a physician can affect our decision to visit her/him. To investigate the specific role of the number of users rating a physician when choosing a physician with support of these platforms, we used a Judge-Advisor System in which participants answered their likelihood to visit a physician before and after seeing the recommendations of others. Within the experiment, three conditions were presented: high and low number of reviewers recommending a physician, and no recommendations. We found that the participants' likelihood to visit a physician varied with respect to the displayed physician characteristics on the platform. Importantly, after the recommendation of others was presented, participants' likelihood to visit the physician changed significantly. The participants' adjusted response was significantly closer to the recommendation coming from a higher number of users, which indicate that this online, social media cue influences our decision to visit physicians. Comments and ratings on physician ratings are generally positive, but we show that negative ratings have a direct negative influence in the decision to visit a physician. We suggest administrators of these platforms to pay special attention to the content that users upload.
医生评价网站允许用户查看医生的个人资料、撰写评价或对其表现进行评分。其他用户对医生的评价会影响我们选择去看他/她的决定。为了研究在使用这些平台时,用户对医生评价的数量对选择医生的具体作用,我们使用了法官-顾问系统,参与者在看到他人的推荐之前和之后回答他们去看医生的可能性。在实验中,呈现了三种条件:推荐医生的高数量和低数量的评论者,以及没有推荐。我们发现,参与者去看医生的可能性因平台上显示的医生特征而有所不同。重要的是,在呈现他人的推荐后,参与者去看医生的可能性发生了显著变化。参与者的调整后的反应明显更接近来自更多用户的推荐,这表明这种在线社交媒体线索会影响我们去看医生的决定。对医生评价的评论和评分通常是正面的,但我们表明负面评分会对看医生的决定产生直接的负面影响。我们建议这些平台的管理员特别注意用户上传的内容。