• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定位与分化:有疾病经历的人寻求成为健康服务开发者和生产者的合法身份。

Alignments and differentiations: People with illness experiences seeking legitimate positions as health service developers and producers.

作者信息

Jones Marjaana, Pietilä Ilkka

机构信息

University of Tampere, Finland.

University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Health (London). 2020 May;24(3):223-240. doi: 10.1177/1363459318800154. Epub 2018 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1177/1363459318800154
PMID:30222007
Abstract

Health policies and strategies promote the involvement of people with illness experiences in service development and production, integrating them into settings that have traditionally been domains of health professionals. In this study, we focus on the perspectives of people with personal illness experiences and explore how they justify involvement, position themselves as legitimate actors and forge collaborative relationships with health professionals. We have used discourse analysis in analysing individual interviews conducted with peer support workers and experts by experience (n = 17) who currently work in Finnish health services. The interviewees utilised discourses of empowerment, efficiency and patient-centeredness, aligning themselves with the justifications constructed by patient movements additionally to those found in current health policies. Both groups wanted to retain critical distance from professionals in order to voice criticisms of current care practices, yet they also frequently aligned themselves with professionals in order to gain legitimacy for their involvement. They adopted professional traits that moved them further from being lay participants sharing personal experiences and adopted an expert position. Although national-level policies provided backing and legitimacy for involvement, the lack of local-level guidance could hinder the practical implementation and make involvement largely dependent of professionals' discretion.

摘要

卫生政策和战略促进有疾病经历的人参与服务的开发和提供,将他们融入传统上属于卫生专业人员领域的环境中。在本研究中,我们关注有个人疾病经历者的观点,探讨他们如何为参与提供正当理由、将自己定位为合法行为者以及与卫生专业人员建立合作关系。我们运用话语分析方法,分析了对目前在芬兰卫生服务机构工作的同伴支持工作者和有经验的专家(n = 17)进行的个人访谈。受访者运用了赋权、效率和以患者为中心的话语,除了当前卫生政策中的理由外,还与患者运动构建的理由保持一致。两组人都希望与专业人员保持一定距离,以便对当前的护理实践提出批评,但他们也经常与专业人员保持一致,以便为自己的参与获得合法性。他们采用了一些专业特质,这使他们不再仅仅是分享个人经历的外行参与者,而是采用了专家立场。尽管国家层面的政策为参与提供了支持和合法性,但缺乏地方层面的指导可能会阻碍实际实施,并使参与在很大程度上依赖于专业人员的自由裁量权。

相似文献

1
Alignments and differentiations: People with illness experiences seeking legitimate positions as health service developers and producers.定位与分化:有疾病经历的人寻求成为健康服务开发者和生产者的合法身份。
Health (London). 2020 May;24(3):223-240. doi: 10.1177/1363459318800154. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
2
Expertise, advocacy and activism: A qualitative study on the activities of prostate cancer peer support workers.专业知识、倡导和行动主义:前列腺癌同伴支持工作者活动的定性研究。
Health (London). 2020 Jan;24(1):21-37. doi: 10.1177/1363459318785711. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
3
Combining technical and expert-by-experience knowledge in the quest for personal recovery from bipolar disorder: a qualitative study.结合技术和专家经验知识,追求双相情感障碍的个人康复:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 26;19(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2357-3.
4
'I can see it and I can feel it, but I can't put my finger on it': A Foucauldian discourse analysis of experiences of relating on psychiatric inpatient units.“我能看到它,能感觉到它,但我说不出它是什么”:精神科住院病房中人际关系体验的福柯式话语分析。
Psychol Psychother. 2018 Sep;91(3):317-331. doi: 10.1111/papt.12162. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Cancer and serious mental illness--patient, caregiver and professional perspectives: study protocol.癌症与严重精神疾病——患者、照料者及专业人士观点:研究方案
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Jan;72(1):217-26. doi: 10.1111/jan.12812. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
Professionals' perceptions of the establishment of a specialized brief therapy unit in a district psychiatric centre - a qualitative study.专业人士对在地区精神病中心设立专门的短期治疗单位的看法——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 20;20(1):1056. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05926-8.
8
Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare.向患有长期疾病的人学习:初级医疗保健治理的新见解
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jul;22(4):405-16. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12097. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
9
What happens when peer support workers are introduced as members of community-based clinical mental health service delivery teams: a qualitative study.当同伴支持工作者作为社区临床心理健康服务提供团队的成员被引入时会发生什么:一项定性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Jan-Feb;34(1):107-115. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1612334. Epub 2019 May 19.
10
Caught between good intentions and rigid structures: A qualitative description of professionals' experiences with health promotion in mental health services.夹在良好意愿和僵化结构之间:专业人员在精神卫生服务中进行健康促进的经验的定性描述。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Sep;36(3):663-672. doi: 10.1111/scs.13023. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Legitimacy as Social Infrastructure: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature on Legitimacy in Health and Technology.作为社会基础设施的合法性:对健康与技术领域合法性文献的批判性解释性综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 5;12:e48955. doi: 10.2196/48955.
2
Embedding artificial intelligence in healthcare: An ethnographic exploration of an AI-based mHealth app through the lens of legitimacy.将人工智能融入医疗保健:通过合法性视角对一款基于人工智能的移动健康应用程序进行人种志探索。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 8;10:20552076241292390. doi: 10.1177/20552076241292390. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.
研究伙伴关系中的角色、成果与促进因素:关于患者及公众参与健康研究的文献快速综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 15;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00448-z.
4
Managers as peer workers' allies: A qualitative study of managers' perceptions and actions to involve peer workers in Norwegian mental health and substance use services.管理者作为同伴工作者的盟友:一项关于管理者在挪威心理健康和物质使用服务中让同伴工作者参与的认知与行动的定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023 Jun 12;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00588-5.
5
Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in healthcare education and thesis work: the first step towards PPIE knowledgeable healthcare professionals.患者和公众参与及投入(PPIE)在医疗保健教育和论文工作:迈向有 PPIE 知识的医疗保健专业人员的第一步。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):e067588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067588.
6
Peer Workers in Co-production and Co-creation in Mental Health and Substance Use Services: A Scoping Review.同伴工作人员在精神健康和物质使用服务中的共同生产和共同创造:范围综述。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 Mar;50(2):296-316. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01242-x. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Experiential expertise in the co-development of social and health-care services: Self-promotion and self-dismissal as interactional strategies.经验专长在社会和医疗保健服务的共同发展中的作用:自我推销和自我否定作为互动策略。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Apr;44(4-5):764-780. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13457. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
8
Negotiating mental illness across the lay-professional divide: Role play in peer work consultations.跨越业余与专业界限协商精神疾病:朋辈工作咨询中的角色扮演。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Apr;44(4-5):815-829. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13456. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
9
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.