Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Apr;44(4-5):764-780. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13457. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
Increasing client involvement in the development of social and health-care services has resulted in clients being invited to present their experiential knowledge in service co-development groups. Nevertheless, research has shown that their opportunities to really contribute to actual decision-making are limited. This article investigates how client representatives initiate turns-at-talk in the decision-making context and the way in which professionals respond to them. Using conversation analysis, we analyzed 15 h of recorded interactions in five co-development workshops. Our data exhibited a systematic pattern that linked client representatives' self-promoting and self-dismissive turns-at-talk to specific types of responses from professionals. When the client representatives highlighted the relevance of their experiential knowledge for making decisions, the professionals disregarded their contributions. However, if instead, the client representatives cast their experiential knowledge as irrelevant to the decision-making activity at hand, the professionals subsequently appreciated this knowledge. Thus, paradoxically, in order to establish the relevance of their views, client representatives diminished their positions as experiential experts.
增加客户参与社会和医疗保健服务的发展,导致客户被邀请在服务共同开发小组中展示他们的经验知识。然而,研究表明,他们真正为实际决策做出贡献的机会有限。本文调查了客户代表如何在决策背景下发起谈话轮次,以及专业人员如何回应他们。使用会话分析,我们分析了五个共同开发研讨会中 15 小时的记录互动。我们的数据显示了一种系统模式,将客户代表的自我推销和自我否定的谈话轮次与专业人员的特定类型的回应联系起来。当客户代表强调他们的经验知识对做出决策的相关性时,专业人员会忽视他们的贡献。然而,如果客户代表将他们的经验知识描述为与手头的决策活动无关,那么专业人员随后会赞赏这些知识。因此,矛盾的是,为了确立他们观点的相关性,客户代表削弱了他们作为经验专家的地位。