• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿和1月龄婴儿低风险队列中的瞬态耳声发射和听觉脑干反应:在婴儿猝死综合征和死产网络安全通道研究中对产前酒精暴露婴儿听觉系统生理学的评估

Transient Otoacoustic Emissions and Auditory Brainstem Responses in Low-Risk Cohort of Newborn and One-Month-Old Infants: Assessment of Infant Auditory System Physiology in the Prenatal Alcohol in SIDS and Stillbirth Network Safe Passage Study.

作者信息

Sininger Yvonne S, Condon Carmen G, Hoffman Howard J, Elliott Amy J, Odendaal Hein J, Burd Larry L, Myers Michael M, Fifer William P

机构信息

Department of Head & Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

C&Y Consultants, LLC, Santa Fe, NM.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Sep;29(8):748-763. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17043.

DOI:10.3766/jaaa.17043
PMID:30222544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8252127/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Prenatal Alcohol and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Stillbirth Network, known as the "Safe Passage Study," enrolled approximately 12,000 pregnant women from the United States and South Africa and followed the development of their babies through pregnancy and the infant's first year of life to investigate the role of prenatal alcohol exposure in the risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as stillbirth and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.

PURPOSE

Auditory system tests were included in the physiologic test battery used to study the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on neurophysiology and neurodevelopment, as well as potential causal relationships between neurodevelopmental disorders and SIDS and/or stillbirth. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe normative results when using the auditory test battery applied.

RESEARCH DESIGN

The test battery included the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). Data were collected on individual ears of newborns and 1-month-old infants.

STUDY SAMPLE

From a cohort of 6,070 with auditory system exams, a normative subsample of 325 infants were selected who were not exposed prenatally to alcohol, cigarette smoke, or drugs nor were they preterm or low birthweight. The subsample is small relative to the overall study because of strict criteria for no exposure to substances known to be associated with SIDS or stillbirth and the exclusion of preterm and low birthweight infants. Expectant mothers were recruited from general maternity at two comprehensive clinical sites, in the northern plains in the United States and in Cape Town, South Africa. These populations were selected for study because both were known to be at high-risk for SIDS and stillbirth.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

ABR and TEOAE recordings were stored electronically. Peak latency and amplitude analysis of ABRs were determined by study personnel, and results were evaluated for differences by age, sex, test site, race, and ear (left versus right).

RESULTS

TEOAE findings were consistent with existing literature including the increase in signal-to-noise (SNR) over the first month of life. The SNR increase is due to an increase in amplitude of the emission. TEOAE amplitude asymmetry favoring the right ear was found, whereas SNR asymmetry was not, perhaps because of the small sample size. A nonsignificant trend toward larger responses in female babies was found; a result that is generally statistically significant in studies with larger samples. Latencies were found to be shorter in ABRs elicited in the right ear with amplitudes that were slightly bigger on average. An expected decrease in wave V latency was observed from birth to 1-month of age, but the finding was of borderline significance (p = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

One month is a short time to judge development of the auditory system; however, the ABR and TEOAE findings were consistent with current literature. We conclude that the auditory system data acquired for the Safe Passage Study, as reflected in the data obtained from this cohort of "unexposed" infants, is consistent with published reports of these auditory system measures in the general population.

摘要

背景

产前酒精与婴儿猝死综合征及死产网络(即“安全通道研究”)招募了约12000名来自美国和南非的孕妇,跟踪其婴儿从孕期到出生后第一年的发育情况,以调查产前酒精暴露在婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)风险及不良妊娠结局(如死产和胎儿酒精谱系障碍)中的作用。

目的

听觉系统测试包含在生理测试组中,该测试组用于研究产前酒精暴露对神经生理学和神经发育的影响,以及神经发育障碍与SIDS和/或死产之间的潜在因果关系。本文的目的是描述使用该听觉测试组时的正常结果。

研究设计

测试组包括听觉脑干反应(ABR)和瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)。数据收集于新生儿和1月龄婴儿的单耳。

研究样本

从6070名接受听觉系统检查的队列中,选取了325名未在产前暴露于酒精、香烟烟雾或药物,且既非早产也非低体重的婴儿作为正常子样本。由于对未暴露于已知与SIDS或死产相关物质的严格标准,以及排除早产和低体重婴儿,该子样本相对于总体研究较小。预期母亲从美国北部平原和南非开普敦的两个综合临床站点的普通产科招募。选择这些人群进行研究是因为两者都被认为是SIDS和死产的高危人群。

数据收集与分析

ABR和TEOAE记录以电子方式存储。ABR的峰潜伏期和振幅分析由研究人员确定,并根据年龄、性别、测试站点、种族和耳朵(左耳与右耳)评估结果差异。

结果

TEOAE结果与现有文献一致,包括出生后第一个月内信噪比(SNR)的增加。SNR增加是由于发射振幅的增加。发现TEOAE振幅不对称有利于右耳,而SNR不对称则未发现,可能是由于样本量小。发现女婴反应有变大的非显著趋势;这一结果在样本量较大的研究中通常具有统计学意义。发现右耳诱发的ABR潜伏期较短,平均振幅略大。观察到从出生到1月龄,V波潜伏期预期会缩短,但该发现具有临界显著性(p = 0.058)。

结论

一个月时间判断听觉系统发育较短;然而,ABR和TEOAE结果与当前文献一致。我们得出结论,“安全通道研究”获得的听觉系统数据,正如从这组“未暴露”婴儿获得的数据所反映的,与普通人群中这些听觉系统测量的已发表报告一致。

相似文献

1
Transient Otoacoustic Emissions and Auditory Brainstem Responses in Low-Risk Cohort of Newborn and One-Month-Old Infants: Assessment of Infant Auditory System Physiology in the Prenatal Alcohol in SIDS and Stillbirth Network Safe Passage Study.新生儿和1月龄婴儿低风险队列中的瞬态耳声发射和听觉脑干反应:在婴儿猝死综合征和死产网络安全通道研究中对产前酒精暴露婴儿听觉系统生理学的评估
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Sep;29(8):748-763. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17043.
2
Prenatal Exposure to Tobacco and Alcohol Alters Development of the Neonatal Auditory System.产前暴露于烟草和酒精会改变新生儿听觉系统的发育。
Dev Neurosci. 2021;43(6):358-375. doi: 10.1159/000518130. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: feasibility in the nursery.瞬态诱发耳声发射:在新生儿重症监护室的可行性
Ear Hear. 1996 Feb;17(1):42-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199602000-00005.
4
Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in neonates and young children: a correlation and factor analytical study.新生儿和幼儿耳声发射与听觉脑干反应之间的关系:一项相关性和因素分析研究。
Laryngoscope. 2002 Jan;112(1):156-67. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200201000-00028.
5
Cochlear receptor (microphonic and summating potentials, otoacoustic emissions) and auditory pathway (auditory brain stem potentials) activity in auditory neuropathy.听觉神经病中的耳蜗感受器(微音器电位和总和电位、耳声发射)及听觉通路(听觉脑干电位)活动
Ear Hear. 2001 Apr;22(2):91-9. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00002.
6
Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.新生儿听力障碍的识别:瞬态诱发耳声发射、畸变产物耳声发射及听性脑干反应测试性能评估
Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):508-28. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00013.
7
Newborn hearing screening at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Auditory Brainstem Maturation in preterm infants.新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿听力筛查与早产儿听觉脑干成熟度
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Aug;123:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
Cochlear Microphonic and Summating Potential Responses from Click-Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in High-Risk and Normal Infants.高危和正常婴儿中短声诱发听觉脑干反应的耳蜗微音电位和总和电位反应
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 May;29(5):427-442. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17085.
9
Ear asymmetries in middle-ear, cochlear, and brainstem responses in human infants.人类婴儿中耳、耳蜗及脑干反应中的耳部不对称性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Mar;123(3):1504-12. doi: 10.1121/1.2832615.
10
Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.高危新生儿听力筛查的可靠性:耳声发射、自动和传统听性脑干反应的比较研究
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;118(4):869-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.12.015. Epub 2007 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and the routine otoacoustic emission infant hearing screening test: an epidemiological retrospective case-control study.婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)与常规耳声发射婴儿听力筛查测试:一项回顾性病例对照的流行病学研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 18;9(7):e030026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030026.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for a Right-Ear Advantage in Newborn Hearing Screening Results.新生儿听力筛查结果右耳优势的证据。
Trends Hear. 2016 Dec 6;20:2331216516681168. doi: 10.1177/2331216516681168.
2
The safe passage study: design, methods, recruitment, and follow-up approach.安全通道研究:设计、方法、招募及随访方法
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;28(5):455-65. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12136. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
3
Ambient noise levels and infant hearing screening programs in developing countries: an observational report.发展中国家的环境噪声水平与婴儿听力筛查计划:观察报告。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Aug;49(8):535-41. doi: 10.3109/14992021003717768.
4
Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.出生后第一个月内瞬态诱发耳声发射的变化。
Ear Hear. 2009 Jun;30(3):330-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819c4000.
5
The impact of maternal smoking on fast auditory brainstem responses.母亲吸烟对快速听觉脑干反应的影响。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2009 Jul-Aug;31(4):216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
6
Comment on "Ear Asymmetries in middle-ear, cochlear, and brainstem responses in human infants" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 1504-1512].关于“人类婴儿中耳、耳蜗及脑干反应中的耳部不对称性”的评论 [《美国声学学会杂志》123, 1504 - 1512]
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1401-3. doi: 10.1121/1.2956481.
7
Changes in the DP-gram during the preterm and early postnatal period.早产及出生后早期DP-gram的变化。
Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):512-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816c40bb.
8
Characteristics of normal newborn transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions: ear asymmetries and sex effects.正常新生儿瞬态诱发耳声发射的特征:耳不对称性和性别影响。
Int J Audiol. 2007 Nov;46(11):661-9. doi: 10.1080/14992020701438797.
9
Newborn oto-acoustic emission hearing screening tests: preliminary evidence for a marker of susceptibility to SIDS.新生儿耳声发射听力筛查测试:婴儿猝死综合征易感性标志物的初步证据。
Early Hum Dev. 2008 Apr;84(4):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
10
Hearing screening and middle ear measures in American Indian infants and toddlers.美国印第安婴幼儿的听力筛查与中耳测量
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep;71(9):1429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.05.020. Epub 2007 Jun 27.