Suppr超能文献

婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)与常规耳声发射婴儿听力筛查测试:一项回顾性病例对照的流行病学研究。

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and the routine otoacoustic emission infant hearing screening test: an epidemiological retrospective case-control study.

机构信息

Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 18;9(7):e030026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030026.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether decreased otoacoustic emission (OAE) signal recordings in the right ear are associated with an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and to monitor any temporal changes in risk factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

Telephone interviews with families recruited in England between July 2016 and October 2017 who experienced the unexpected death of a child <4 years old since 2008 and control families recruited from maternity wards in Bristol and Birmingham.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited 91 (89%) of the 102 bereaved families who made initial contact, 64 deaths were under 1 year (sudden unexpected death in infancy) of which 60 remained unexplained (SIDS). Of the 220 control families, 194 (88%) follow-up interviews were conducted. We had analysable hearing data for 24 SIDS infants (40%) and 98 controls (51%).

RESULTS

OAE signals were marginally increased rather than decreased among SIDS infants for the right ear, especially at lower frequencies, but not significantly so. The strongest predictors of SIDS were bed-sharing in hazardous (infant sleeping next to a carer who smoked, drank alcohol or slept on a sofa) circumstances (35% vs 3% controls, p<0.0001), infants found prone (33% vs 3% controls, p<0.0001) and infants whose health in the final week was 'not good' (53% vs 9% controls, p<0.0001). The prevalence of maternal smoking during pregnancy among both SIDS mothers (20%) and controls (10%) was much lower than previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing data were difficult to obtain; larger numbers would be needed to determine if asymmetrical differences between the right and left ear were a marker for SIDS. A national prospective registry for monitoring and a renewed campaign to a new generation of parents needs to be considered underlining the initial message to place infants on their backs for sleep and the more recent message to avoid bed-sharing in hazardous circumstances.

摘要

目的

研究右耳耳声发射(OAE)信号记录减少是否与婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)风险增加相关,并监测危险因素的任何时间变化。

设计

回顾性病例对照研究。

地点

2016 年 7 月至 2017 年 10 月期间,在英格兰通过电话采访招募自 2008 年以来经历过 4 岁以下儿童意外死亡的家庭(病例组)和布里斯托尔和伯明翰的产妇病房招募的对照组家庭。

参与者

我们招募了 91 名(89%)与我们首次联系的 102 个丧亲家庭中的 91 名,64 名死亡的婴儿年龄小于 1 岁(婴儿期猝死),其中 60 名死因仍未明确(SIDS)。在 220 个对照组家庭中,有 194 个(88%)进行了随访访谈。我们对 24 名 SIDS 婴儿(40%)和 98 名对照(51%)有可分析的听力数据。

结果

与对照组相比,SIDS 婴儿的右耳 OAE 信号略有增加(而非减少),尤其是在较低频率时,但无统计学意义。SIDS 的最强预测因素是在危险情况下(婴儿睡在吸烟、饮酒或睡在沙发上的照顾者旁边)与父母同床睡(35%比对照组 3%,p<0.0001)、仰卧(33%比对照组 3%,p<0.0001)和最后一周健康状况不佳(53%比对照组 9%,p<0.0001)。SIDS 母亲(20%)和对照组(10%)在怀孕期间吸烟的比例均远低于以往的研究。

结论

听力数据难以获得;需要更大的样本量来确定右耳和左耳之间的不对称差异是否是 SIDS 的标志。需要考虑建立一个全国性的监测前瞻性登记册,并向新一代父母发起新的宣传活动,强调最初的信息是让婴儿仰卧睡觉,以及最近的信息是避免在危险情况下与父母同床睡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3226/6661569/2344ca237eb5/bmjopen-2019-030026f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验