• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为学小鼠的视觉时间对比敏感度与人的心理物理学具有基本相同的特性。

Visual Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in the Behaving Mouse Shares Fundamental Properties with Human Psychophysics.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210.

出版信息

eNeuro. 2018 Aug 29;5(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0181-18.2018. eCollection 2018 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0181-18.2018
PMID:30225342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6140104/
Abstract

The mammalian visual system has a remarkable capacity to detect differences in contrast across time, which is known as temporal contrast sensitivity (TCS). Details of the underlying neural mechanisms are rapidly emerging as a result of a series of elegant electrophysiological studies performed largely with the mouse as an experimental model. However, rigorous psychophysical methods are necessary to pair the electrophysiology with temporal visual behavior in mouse. The optomotor response is frequently used as a proxy for retinal temporal processing in rodents. However, subcortical reflexive pathways drive the optomotor response rather than cortical decision-making areas. To address this problem, we have developed an operant behavior assay that measures TCS in behaving mice. Mice were trained to perform a forced-choice visual task and were tested daily on their ability to distinguish flickering from nonflickering overhead lights. Correct responses (Hit and Correct Rejections) were rewarded. Contrast, temporal frequency, and mean illumination of the flicker were the independent variables. We validated and applied the theory of signal detection to estimate the discriminability factor (´), a measure of performance that is independent of response bias and motivation. The empirical contrast threshold was defined as the contrast necessary to elicit ´ = 1 and TCS as the inverse of the contrast threshold. With this approach, we established in the mouse a model of human vision that shares fundamental properties of human temporal psychophysics such as Weber adaptation in response to low temporal frequency flicker and illumination-dependent increases in critical flicker frequency as predicted by the Ferry-Porter law.

摘要

哺乳动物视觉系统具有卓越的检测时间上对比度差异的能力,这被称为时间对比敏感度 (TCS)。由于一系列使用小鼠作为实验模型的精巧电生理研究,有关潜在神经机制的细节正在迅速浮现。然而,为了将电生理学与小鼠的时间视觉行为相匹配,严格的心理物理学方法是必要的。光运动反应经常被用作啮齿动物视网膜时间处理的替代物。然而,皮质下反射性通路驱动光运动反应,而不是皮质决策区域。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种行为测定法,用于测量行为小鼠的 TCS。小鼠接受训练以执行强制选择视觉任务,并每天接受测试,以测试其区分闪烁和非闪烁顶灯的能力。正确的反应(命中和正确拒绝)会得到奖励。对比度、时间频率和闪烁的平均照度是独立变量。我们验证并应用信号检测理论来估计辨别力因素 (´),这是一种独立于反应偏差和动机的性能衡量标准。经验对比阈值被定义为引起´= 1 所需的对比度,而 TCS 则是对比度阈值的倒数。通过这种方法,我们在小鼠中建立了一种与人类视觉具有基本相同特性的模型,例如对低时间频率闪烁的韦伯适应,以及根据费里-波特定律预测的临界闪烁频率随照明强度的增加而增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/949e9ba7175b/enu0041826980007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/27ff2e92172b/enu0041826980001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/cc5e804d05b3/enu0041826980002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/8a2c8340abe2/enu0041826980003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/9084dffeeef0/enu0041826980004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/7c5402965eca/enu0041826980005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/825e48b2fe4e/enu0041826980006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/949e9ba7175b/enu0041826980007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/27ff2e92172b/enu0041826980001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/cc5e804d05b3/enu0041826980002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/8a2c8340abe2/enu0041826980003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/9084dffeeef0/enu0041826980004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/7c5402965eca/enu0041826980005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/825e48b2fe4e/enu0041826980006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0853/6140104/949e9ba7175b/enu0041826980007.jpg

相似文献

1
Visual Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in the Behaving Mouse Shares Fundamental Properties with Human Psychophysics.行为学小鼠的视觉时间对比敏感度与人的心理物理学具有基本相同的特性。
eNeuro. 2018 Aug 29;5(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0181-18.2018. eCollection 2018 Jul-Aug.
2
Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.视杆细胞光反应动力学限制中间视觉的时间对比敏感度。
J Neurosci. 2019 Apr 17;39(16):3041-3056. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1404-18.2019. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
3
The detection of visual contrast in the behaving mouse.在行为小鼠中检测视觉对比度。
J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 3;31(31):11351-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6689-10.2011.
4
Psychophysical measurement of contrast sensitivity in the behaving mouse.在行为小鼠中进行对比敏感度的心理物理学测量。
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Feb;107(3):758-65. doi: 10.1152/jn.00609.2011. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
5
Evaluation of critical flicker-fusion frequency measurement methods using a touchscreen-based visual temporal discrimination task in the behaving mouse.基于触摸屏的视觉时辨别任务在行为小鼠中评估临界闪烁融合频率测量方法。
Neurosci Res. 2019 Nov;148:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Speed, spatial, and temporal tuning of rod and cone vision in mouse.小鼠视杆和视锥视觉的速度、空间和时间调谐
J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 2;28(1):189-98. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3551-07.2008.
7
Temporal-contrast discrimination and its neural correlates.时间对比度辨别及其神经关联。
Perception. 1996;25(5):505-22. doi: 10.1068/p250505.
8
Contextual determinants of temporal control: Behavioral contrast in a free-operant psychophysical procedure.时间控制的情境决定因素:自由操作心理物理学程序中的行为对比
Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.005. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
9
Effects of visual flicker on subjective time in a temporal bisection task.在时间二等分任务中视觉闪烁对主观时间的影响。
Behav Processes. 2008 Jul;78(3):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
10
Signal Detection Theoretic Estimates of the Murine Absolute Visual Threshold Are Independent of Decision Bias.信号检测理论估计的小鼠绝对视觉阈值与决策偏差无关。
eNeuro. 2024 Oct 9;11(10). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0222-24.2024. Print 2024 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Disruptions in primary visual cortex physiology and function in a mouse model of Timothy syndrome.蒂莫西综合征小鼠模型中初级视觉皮层生理和功能的破坏。
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Jun 4;35(6). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf162.
2
Center frequency as optimal frequency of visual stimulation for spreading entrained gamma rhythms to other target brain regions in cognitively normal older adults.中心频率作为在认知正常的老年人中将夹带的伽马节律传播到其他目标脑区的视觉刺激的最佳频率。
Geroscience. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01552-6.
3
Signal Detection Theoretic Estimates of the Murine Absolute Visual Threshold Are Independent of Decision Bias.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox.运用模型比较方法,借助Palamedes工具箱在心理物理学研究中检验特定研究假设。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 23;9:1250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01250. eCollection 2018.
2
High-Yield Methods for Accurate Two-Alternative Visual Psychophysics in Head-Fixed Mice.头部固定小鼠中准确的双选择视觉心理物理学的高效方法。
Cell Rep. 2017 Sep 5;20(10):2513-2524. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.047.
3
Bright flash response recovery of mammalian rods in vivo is rate limited by RGS9.
信号检测理论估计的小鼠绝对视觉阈值与决策偏差无关。
eNeuro. 2024 Oct 9;11(10). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0222-24.2024. Print 2024 Oct.
4
A Review of Cervidae Visual Ecology.鹿科动物视觉生态学综述
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jan 27;14(3):420. doi: 10.3390/ani14030420.
5
Mammals Achieve Common Neural Coverage of Visual Scenes Using Distinct Sampling Behaviors.哺乳动物利用不同的采样行为实现视觉场景的常见神经覆盖。
eNeuro. 2024 Feb 9;11(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0287-23.2023. Print 2024 Feb.
6
Awake responses suggest inefficient dense coding in the mouse retina.清醒反应表明小鼠视网膜中的密集编码效率低下。
Elife. 2023 Nov 3;12:e78005. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78005.
7
Circadian Regulation of the Rod Contribution to Mesopic Vision in Mice.昼夜节律对小鼠明视觉中杆状细胞贡献的调节。
J Neurosci. 2022 Nov 23;42(47):8795-8806. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0486-22.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
Cone-Driven Retinal Responses Are Shaped by Rod But Not Cone HCN1.锥形细胞驱动的视网膜反应由视杆细胞而非视锥细胞 HCN1 塑造。
J Neurosci. 2022 May 25;42(21):4231-4249. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2271-21.2022. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
9
Dynamics of Visual Perceptual Decision-Making in Freely Behaving Mice.自由活动小鼠视觉感知决策的动力学。
eNeuro. 2022 Mar 15;9(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0161-21.2022. Print 2022 Mar-Apr.
10
Color and contrast vision in mouse models of aging and Alzheimer's disease using a novel visual-stimuli four-arm maze.使用新型视觉刺激四臂迷宫研究衰老和阿尔茨海默病小鼠模型的颜色和对比视觉。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):1255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-80988-0.
哺乳动物视杆细胞在体内的明闪光反应恢复受RGS9限制。
J Gen Physiol. 2017 Apr 3;149(4):443-454. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611692. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
4
Cellular and Circuit Mechanisms Shaping the Perceptual Properties of the Primate Fovea.塑造灵长类动物中央凹感知特性的细胞和回路机制。
Cell. 2017 Jan 26;168(3):413-426.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.005.
5
A system to measure the pupil response to steady lights in freely behaving mice.一种用于测量自由活动小鼠对稳定光线的瞳孔反应的系统。
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Nov 1;273:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
6
Distinct recurrent versus afferent dynamics in cortical visual processing.皮层视觉处理中不同的传出与传入动态。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Dec;18(12):1789-97. doi: 10.1038/nn.4153. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Adaptation to background light enables contrast coding at rod bipolar cell synapses.适应背景光使杆状双极细胞突触的对比度编码成为可能。
Neuron. 2014 Jan 22;81(2):388-401. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.054. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
8
Probing perceptual decisions in rodents.在啮齿动物中探究知觉决策。
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Jul;16(7):824-31. doi: 10.1038/nn.3410. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
9
The relationship between slow photoresponse recovery rate and temporal resolution of vision.慢光响应恢复速率与视觉时间分辨率之间的关系。
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 10;32(41):14364-73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1296-12.2012.
10
Psychophysical measurement of contrast sensitivity in the behaving mouse.在行为小鼠中进行对比敏感度的心理物理学测量。
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Feb;107(3):758-65. doi: 10.1152/jn.00609.2011. Epub 2011 Nov 2.