• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[创伤登记数据库DGU®数据集、其25年的发展历程以及重伤患者护理方面的进展]

[The TraumaRegister DGU® dataset, its development over 25 years and advances in the care of severely injured patients].

作者信息

Trentzsch H, Maegele M, Nienaber U, Paffrath T, Lefering R

机构信息

Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (INM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Schillerstr. 51, 80336, München, Deutschland.

Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie & Sporttraumatologie, Klinikum der Privaten Universität Witten/Herdecke , Köln-Merheim, Deutschland.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2018 Oct;121(10):794-801. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0555-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00113-018-0555-y
PMID:30225633
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the publication in 1993, the dataset and documentation form of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) have continuously evolved. On the occasion of the 25th anniversary the authors have analyzed this evolution in order to reflect it in the light of medical progress in the treatment of the severely injured.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Enrolled in the study were 5 reference data entry sheets from the years 1993, 1996, 2002, 2009 and 2016. Every piece of information (item) queried therein was entered into the study database, was categorized by topic and counted for further analysis.

RESULTS

The arrangement of the 4‑page data entry form has remained practically unchanged since 1993 and includes an average of 212 items. A total of 491 items were identified of which 64 were present throughout every dataset. Based on the average extent of the form this equals a proportion of approximately 30%. The dataset actually shows much more consistency than this number suggests because many changes can be traced back to a smarter design of the data entry form. Most items fell into the categories "results/diagnosis" (143 items/29.1%), "coagulation" (104/21.2%) and "surgical approach" (40/8.1%). Many items serve as raw data for the calculation of prognostic risk scores, such as the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), the revised injury severity classification II (RISC II) and the trauma associated severe hemorrhage (TASH) score. Currently, nine scores can be calculated from the dataset.

CONCLUSION

The members of the working group TraumaRegister all actively participate in the treatment of severely injured patients. For 25 years this group has managed to unify the latest medical developments and well-established parameters within the TR-DGU dataset at a relatively constant degree of effort for documentation. Practice in place of theory is the driving force behind this development that serves quality assurance and research in the treatment of severely injured patients.

摘要

背景

自1993年发布以来,创伤注册数据库DGU®(TR-DGU)的数据集和文档形式不断演变。在其成立25周年之际,作者对这一演变进行了分析,以便根据严重创伤治疗方面的医学进展对其加以反映。

材料与方法

纳入研究的有1993年、1996年、2002年、2009年和2016年的5份参考数据录入表。其中查询到的每条信息(条目)都被录入研究数据库,按主题分类并计数以进行进一步分析。

结果

自1993年以来,4页的数据录入表格式基本保持不变,平均包含212个条目。总共识别出491个条目,其中64个在每个数据集中都有。基于该表格的平均篇幅,这相当于约30%的比例。实际上,数据集显示出的一致性比这个数字所表明的要高得多,因为许多变化可追溯到数据录入表更巧妙的设计。大多数条目属于“结果/诊断”(143条/29.1%)、“凝血”(104条/21.2%)和“手术方式”(40条/8.1%)类别。许多条目用作计算预后风险评分的原始数据,如创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)、修订的损伤严重程度分类II(RISC II)和创伤相关严重出血(TASH)评分。目前,可从该数据集中计算出9种评分。

结论

创伤注册工作组的成员都积极参与严重创伤患者的治疗。25年来,该团队在记录工作投入相对稳定的情况下,成功地将最新医学进展和既定参数统一纳入TR-DGU数据集中。实践而非理论是这一发展的驱动力,其服务于严重创伤患者治疗中的质量保证和研究。

相似文献

1
[The TraumaRegister DGU® dataset, its development over 25 years and advances in the care of severely injured patients].[创伤登记数据库DGU®数据集、其25年的发展历程以及重伤患者护理方面的进展]
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Oct;121(10):794-801. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0555-y.
2
[Data content of the TraumaRegister DGU® : Results of a random sample control].[创伤注册数据库DGU®的数据内容:随机样本对照结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Oct;121(10):802-809. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0554-z.
3
[Future perspective of the TraumaRegister DGU® : Further development, additional modules and potential limits].[创伤注册数据库DGU®的未来展望:进一步发展、附加模块及潜在局限]
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Oct;121(10):774-780. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0558-8.
4
[Scientific impact of the TraumaRegister DGU®].[创伤登记数据库DGU®的科学影响力]
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Oct;121(10):781-787. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0536-1.
5
[The TraumaRegister DGU® as the basis of medical quality management. Ten years experience of a national trauma centre exemplified by emergency room treatment].[创伤注册数据库DGU®作为医疗质量管理的基础。以一家国家创伤中心十年的急诊治疗经验为例]
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Jul;116(7):624-32. doi: 10.1007/s00113-012-2251-7.
6
[Civilian blast injuries: an underestimated problem? : Results of a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®].[平民爆炸伤:一个被低估的问题?:创伤登记DGU®回顾性分析结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Oct;119(10):843-53. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0046-3.
7
[Empirical evaluation of quality indicators for severely injured patients in the TraumaRegister DGU®].[创伤登记DGU®中重伤患者质量指标的实证评估]
Unfallchirurg. 2020 Mar;123(3):206-215. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-0699-4.
8
20 years of trauma documentation in Germany--actual trends and developments.德国20年创伤记录——当前趋势与发展
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.012.
9
[The TraumaRegister DGU® as data source for monitoring severe injuries].[创伤注册数据库DGU®作为监测严重创伤的数据源]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2014 Jun;57(6):660-5. doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-1968-6.
10
Evaluation of new quality indicators for the TraumaRegister DGU using the systematic QUALIFY methodology.运用系统性 QUALIFY 方法评估创伤登记处 DGU 的新质量指标。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Jun;46(3):449-460. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1055-z. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
In the last 10 years, have our polytrauma patients become geriatric? The emergency trauma bay in the context of demographic change.在过去十年中,我们的多发伤患者变老了吗?人口结构变化背景下的急诊创伤室。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 24;51(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02703-8.
2
LeAf Trauma- an intersectoral prospective multicenter study assessing quality of life and return to work after majortrauma-study protocol.叶片创伤 - 一项评估主要创伤后生活质量和重返工作的跨部门前瞻性多中心研究 - 研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 13;19(11):e0312320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312320. eCollection 2024.
3
Imposter or knight in shining armor? Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) for severe pelvic injuries in patients with multiple trauma: a trauma-registry analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Level 3 guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries : AWMF Register-Nr. 012/019.重度/多发伤患者治疗的三级指南:德国医学专业协会注册编号012/019
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr;44(Suppl 1):3-271. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0922-y.
2
Trauma-induced coagulopathy upon emergency room arrival: still a significant problem despite increased awareness and management?急诊室就诊时创伤性凝血病:尽管认识和管理有所提高,仍是一个重大问题?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Feb;45(1):115-124. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0884-5. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
3
Damage control resuscitation.
冒名顶替者还是穿着闪亮盔甲的骑士?用于多发伤患者严重骨盆损伤的骨盆周径压缩装置(PCCD):创伤登记分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 16;32(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01172-z.
4
Ambulance deployment without transport: a retrospective difference analysis for the description of emergency interventions without patient transport in Bavaria.无转运的救护车派遣:巴伐利亚州无患者转运的紧急干预描述的回顾性差异分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Dec 6;31(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01159-w.
5
[Influence of the general data protection regulation on data quality in registry data collection : Selection bias due to data protection requirements and the impact on key indicators for measuring the quality of care in a level 1 trauma center].[《通用数据保护条例》对注册数据收集过程中数据质量的影响:数据保护要求导致的选择偏倚及其对一级创伤中心医疗质量关键指标的影响]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Apr;126(4):293-298. doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01155-2. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
[Patient consent for the TraumaRegistry DGU based on the GDPR-A challenge for the hospitals: status quo and solution strategies].[基于通用数据保护条例的创伤登记处DGU患者同意书:医院面临的挑战、现状及解决策略]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Jul;125(7):553-558. doi: 10.1007/s00113-021-01060-0. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
[Challenges of digitalization in trauma care].[创伤护理数字化面临的挑战]
Unfallchirurg. 2020 Nov;123(11):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00859-7.
损伤控制复苏
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33(Pt B):218-221. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.064. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
4
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition.《欧洲创伤后大出血和凝血功能障碍管理指南:第四版》
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 12;20:100. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1265-x.
5
Preventable and potentially preventable deaths in severely injured patients: a retrospective analysis including patterns of errors.重伤患者中可预防和潜在可预防的死亡:一项包括错误模式的回顾性分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug;43(4):481-489. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0670-9. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
6
Development and validation of the revised injury severity classification score for severely injured patients.严重受伤患者修订版损伤严重程度分类评分的开发与验证
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Oct;35(5):437-47. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9122-0. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
7
Randomized, controlled, two-arm, interventional, multicenter study on risk-adapted damage control orthopedic surgery of femur shaft fractures in multiple-trauma patients.多创伤患者股骨干骨折风险适应性损伤控制骨科手术的随机、对照、双臂、介入性、多中心研究
Trials. 2016 Jan 25;17:47. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1162-2.
8
Comparison of clinically suspected injuries with injuries detected at whole-body CT in suspected multi-trauma victims.疑似多发伤患者临床疑似损伤与全身CT检查发现损伤的比较。
Clin Radiol. 2015 Nov;70(11):1205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.084. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
9
Tranexamic acid as part of remote damage-control resuscitation in the prehospital setting: A critical appraisal of the medical literature and available alternatives.氨甲环酸作为院前环境中远程损伤控制复苏的一部分:对医学文献及可用替代方案的批判性评估
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jun;78(6 Suppl 1):S70-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000640.
10
Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial.严重创伤患者血浆、血小板和红细胞以1:1:1与1:1:2比例输注及死亡率:PROPPR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):471-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12.