Stratton Kasee K, Hartshorne Timothy
Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Mississippi State University, School Psychology Program, Box 9727, 543 Allen Hall, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA, Phone: 662-325-5461.
Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Sloan Hall 215, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA.
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):157-166. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0080.
Background and aims The objective was to conduct the first investigation to identify the frequency and intensity of pain experiences for individuals with CHARGE syndrome and to review the use of two established non-vocal pain assessments with children with CHARGE, the NCCPC-R (Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist-Revised) and the PPP (Pediatrics Pain Profile). Methods Parents of children with CHARGE were enrolled. Participants completed a pain questionnaire and the NCCPC-R and PPP twice, once for a baseline measure and second during a painful experience for their child. Results A moderate negative correlation between the mean intensity of pain and the mean duration of pain among individuals with CHARGE was found, ρ=-0.34. There was a tendency for intensity of pain to increase for sources of pain that were of shorter duration. The NCCPC-R and PPP were found to identify pain when compared to baseline performance (no pain) with a large effect, d=1.3. For the NCCPC-R, the difference between these ratings was significant beyond the 0.05 level, t (40)=8.15, p=0.000, 95% CI [16.93, 28.10]. Similarly, for the PPP, the mean pain ratings were significantly greater than the mean ratings for no pain, with significance beyond the 0.05 level, t (51)=9.59, p=0.000, CI 95% [11.74, 17.96]. Conclusions Evidence exists that children with CHARGE experience pain. While the NCCPC-R and PPP were found to identify pain; future research should consider the development of a pain assessment individualized to pain behaviors present in CHARGE syndrome, given this population's unique expression of pain.
本研究旨在首次调查CHARGE综合征患者疼痛经历的频率和强度,并评估两种已确立的针对CHARGE综合征儿童的非言语疼痛评估工具,即修订版非语言儿童疼痛清单(NCCPC-R)和儿科疼痛量表(PPP)的使用情况。方法:招募CHARGE综合征患儿的家长。参与者两次填写疼痛问卷以及NCCPC-R和PPP,一次作为基线测量,另一次在其孩子经历疼痛时填写。结果:发现CHARGE综合征患者的平均疼痛强度与平均疼痛持续时间之间存在中度负相关,ρ = -0.34。疼痛持续时间较短的疼痛源,其疼痛强度有增加的趋势。与基线表现(无疼痛)相比,NCCPC-R和PPP在识别疼痛方面具有较大效应,d = 1.3。对于NCCPC-R,这些评分之间的差异在0.05水平上具有统计学意义,t(40) = 8.15,p = 0.000,95%置信区间[16.93, 28.10]。同样,对于PPP,平均疼痛评分显著高于无疼痛时的平均评分,在0.05水平上具有统计学意义,t(51) = 9.59,p = 0.000,95%置信区间[11.74, 17.96]。结论:有证据表明CHARGE综合征患儿会经历疼痛。虽然发现NCCPC-R和PPP能够识别疼痛;但鉴于该人群独特的疼痛表现,未来研究应考虑开发一种针对CHARGE综合征疼痛行为的个性化疼痛评估工具。