• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用大规模研究方法对自由回忆和识别记忆中的词汇语义效应进行项目级分析。

An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach.

作者信息

Lau Mabel C, Goh Winston D, Yap Melvin J

机构信息

1 Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

2 School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2207-2222. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739834. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1177/1747021817739834
PMID:30226433
Abstract

Psycholinguists have developed a number of measures to tap different aspects of a word's semantic representation. The influence of these measures on lexical processing has collectively been described as semantic richness effects. However, the effects of these word properties on memory are currently not well understood. This study examines the relative contributions of lexical and semantic variables in free recall and recognition memory at the item-level, using a megastudy approach. Hierarchical regression of recall and recognition performance on a number of lexical-semantic variables showed task-general effects where the structural component, frequency, number of senses, and arousal accounted for unique variance in both free recall and recognition memory. Task-specific effects included number of features, imageability, and body-object interaction, which accounted for unique variance in recall, whereas age of acquisition, familiarity, and extremity of valence accounted for unique variance in recognition. Forward selection regression analyses generally converged on these findings. Hierarchical regression also revealed that lexical variables accounted for more variance in recognition compared with recall, whereas semantic variables accounted for more unique variance above and beyond lexical variables in recall compared with recognition. Implications of the findings are discussed.

摘要

心理语言学家已经开发出了一些方法来探究一个词的语义表征的不同方面。这些方法对词汇加工的影响被统称为语义丰富性效应。然而,目前人们对这些词的属性对记忆的影响还了解得不够透彻。本研究采用大规模研究方法,在项目层面考察词汇和语义变量在自由回忆和识别记忆中的相对贡献。对回忆和识别表现进行的一系列词汇 - 语义变量的分层回归显示出任务通用效应,其中结构成分、频率、义项数量和唤醒度在自由回忆和识别记忆中都解释了独特的方差。任务特定效应包括特征数量、可想象性和身体与物体的相互作用,这些在回忆中解释了独特的方差,而习得年龄、熟悉度和效价极端性在识别中解释了独特的方差。向前选择回归分析总体上与这些发现一致。分层回归还表明,与回忆相比,词汇变量在识别中解释的方差更多,而与识别相比,语义变量在回忆中除词汇变量之外解释的独特方差更多。本文讨论了这些发现的意义。

相似文献

1
An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach.使用大规模研究方法对自由回忆和识别记忆中的词汇语义效应进行项目级分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2207-2222. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739834. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
2
The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis.词汇变量在汉字视觉识别中的作用:一项大型研究分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1541-70. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.985234. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
3
The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.双字汉语复合词视觉识别中词汇变量的作用:一项大型研究分析
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Sep;71(9):2022-2038. doi: 10.1177/1747021817738965. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.致富的方式有很多种:语义丰富度的三种度量对视觉单词识别的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):161-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.161.
5
Lexical and semantic influences on item and order memory in immediate serial recognition: evidence from a novel task.词汇和语义对即时序列识别中项目和顺序记忆的影响:来自一项新任务的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 May;59(5):949-64. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000141.
6
Dissociative contributions of semantic and lexical-phonological information to immediate recognition.语义和词汇-语音信息对即时识别的分离贡献。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):642-8. doi: 10.1037/a0029160. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
7
Semantic Richness Effects in Spoken Word Recognition: A Lexical Decision and Semantic Categorization Megastudy.口语单词识别中的语义丰富度效应:一项词汇判断与语义分类的大型研究。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 28;7:976. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00976. eCollection 2016.
8
Assessing the effect of lexical variables in backward recall.评估词汇变量在后向回忆中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):312-24. doi: 10.1037/a0025481. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
9
It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.一切都在于呈现方式:语境效价、唤醒水平和具体性对视觉单词加工的影响。
Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:135-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.通过条件朗读的大规模研究来审视文字处理。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Nov;71(11):2295-2313. doi: 10.1177/1747021817741269. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
From semantic knowledge to semantic features: French semantic feature production norms for 360 concepts.从语义知识到语义特征:360个概念的法语语义特征生成规范
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Sep 10;57(10):282. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02814-z.
2
Untangling the threads of motivated memory: Independent influences of reward and emotion.理清动机性记忆的脉络:奖励与情感的独立影响
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):396-406. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02546-9. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Images with harder-to-reconstruct visual representations leave stronger memory traces.
视觉再现较难重构的图像会留下更强的记忆痕迹。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jul;8(7):1309-1320. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01870-3. Epub 2024 May 13.
4
Effects of lexical skills and orthographic neighborhood size in word memory.词汇技能和正字法邻近大小对单词记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):610-621. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01487-3. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
5
Non-arbitrary mappings between size and sound of English words: Form typicality effects during lexical access and memory.英语单词大小与发音之间的非任意映射:词汇通达和记忆过程中的形式典型性效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):943-963. doi: 10.1177/17470218231184940. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Item-Level Scores on the Boston Naming Test as an Independent Predictor of Perirhinal Volume in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.波士顿命名测试中的项目级分数作为轻度认知障碍个体鼻周容积的独立预测指标。
Brain Sci. 2023 May 16;13(5):806. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050806.
7
Word imageability influences the emotionality effect in episodic memory.词的可感性影响情景记忆中的情绪效应。
Cogn Process. 2022 Nov;23(4):655-660. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01102-4. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
8
Predicting recall of words and lists.预测单词和列表的回忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 May;47(5):765-784. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000964. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
9
Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability?探索单词的可记性:不同的单词属性对项目自由回忆概率的解释程度如何?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):583-595. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01820-w. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
A Comparison of the Storage-Only Deficit and Joint Mechanism Deficit Hypotheses of the Verbal Working Memory Storage Capacity Limitation of Children With Developmental Language Disorder.发展性语言障碍儿童言语工作记忆存储容量限制的仅存储缺陷和联合机制缺陷假说的比较。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Oct 25;62(10):3808-3825. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0071. Epub 2019 Oct 9.