• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英语单词大小与发音之间的非任意映射:词汇通达和记忆过程中的形式典型性效应。

Non-arbitrary mappings between size and sound of English words: Form typicality effects during lexical access and memory.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):943-963. doi: 10.1177/17470218231184940. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1177/17470218231184940
PMID:37332149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11032636/
Abstract

A century of research has provided evidence of limited size sound symbolism in English, that is, certain vowels are non-arbitrarily associated with words denoting small versus large referents (e.g., /i/ as in and /ɑ/ as in ). In the present study, we investigated more extensive statistical regularities between surface form properties of English words and ratings of their semantic size, that is, , and its impact on language and memory processing. Our findings provide the first evidence of significant word form typicality for semantic size. In five empirical studies using behavioural megastudy data sets of performance on written and auditory lexical decision, reading aloud, semantic decision, and recognition memory tasks, we show that form typicality for size is a stronger and more consistent predictor of lexical access during word comprehension and production than semantic size, in addition to playing a significant role in verbal memory. The empirical results demonstrate that statistical information about non-arbitrary form-size mappings is accessed automatically during language and verbal memory processing, unlike semantic size that is largely dependent on task contexts that explicitly require participants to access size knowledge. We discuss how a priori knowledge about non-arbitrary form-meaning associations in the lexicon might be incorporated in models of language processing that implement Bayesian statistical inference.

摘要

一个世纪的研究为英语中有限的大小声音象征提供了证据,也就是说,某些元音与表示小与大的指称的单词有非任意的联系(例如,在 中是 /i/,在 中是 /ɑ/)。在本研究中,我们研究了英语单词的表面形式特征与语义大小的评级之间更广泛的统计规律,即 ,以及它对语言和记忆处理的影响。我们的发现为语义大小的显著单词形式典型性提供了第一个证据。在五个使用行为巨量研究数据集的实证研究中,我们在书面和听觉词汇判断、朗读、语义判断和识别记忆任务中的表现,我们表明,大小的形式典型性是词汇理解和产生过程中词汇访问的更强和更一致的预测指标,除了在口头记忆中发挥重要作用。实证结果表明,在语言和口头记忆处理过程中,会自动访问关于非任意形式-大小映射的统计信息,而语义大小则主要取决于明确要求参与者访问大小知识的任务上下文。我们讨论了如何在实施贝叶斯统计推断的语言处理模型中纳入词汇中关于非任意形式-意义关联的先验知识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/ba6159ead1b4/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/3c9728190bcf/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/8ffa986bfd7a/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/2fa02f3cd8e1/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/c144da0838b8/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/96f1e00262ba/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/ba6159ead1b4/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/3c9728190bcf/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/8ffa986bfd7a/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/2fa02f3cd8e1/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/c144da0838b8/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/96f1e00262ba/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd9/11032636/ba6159ead1b4/10.1177_17470218231184940-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-arbitrary mappings between size and sound of English words: Form typicality effects during lexical access and memory.英语单词大小与发音之间的非任意映射:词汇通达和记忆过程中的形式典型性效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):943-963. doi: 10.1177/17470218231184940. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
2
Emotion from the sound of a word: Statistical relationships between surface form and valence of English words influence lexical access and memory.从单词的声音中产生的情绪:英语单词的表面形式和情感之间的统计关系影响词汇的获取和记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Dec;152(12):3566-3593. doi: 10.1037/xge0001477. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Revisiting the concreteness effect: Non-arbitrary mappings between form and concreteness of English words influence lexical processing.重新审视具体性效应:英语单词的形式和具体性之间的非任意映射影响词汇处理。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105972. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105972. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
4
Statistical relationships between surface form and sensory meanings of English words influence lexical processing.英语单词的表面形式和感官意义之间的统计关系影响词汇处理。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Jul;50(7):723-739. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001209. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Feature distinctiveness effects in language acquisition and lexical processing: Insights from megastudies.语言习得和词汇加工中的特征独特性效应:来自大型研究的见解
Cogn Process. 2020 Nov;21(4):669-685. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00947-6. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
The reign of typicality in semantic memory.语义记忆中的典型性主导地位。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):813-21. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2090.
7
Arbitrary symbolism in natural language revisited: when word forms carry meaning.重新审视自然语言中的任意符号:当词形承载意义时。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042286. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
8
On the roles of form systematicity and sensorimotor effects in language processing.论形式系统性和感觉运动效应在语言处理中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Mar;49(3):431-444. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001201. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
9
Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension.语音典型性对在线句子理解有影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12203-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602173103. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
10
Statistical Relationships Between Phonological Form, Emotional Valence and Arousal of Spanish Words.西班牙语单词的语音形式、情感效价与唤醒度之间的统计关系
J Cogn. 2024 May 10;7(1):42. doi: 10.5334/joc.366. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
On the roles of form systematicity and sensorimotor effects in language processing.论形式系统性和感觉运动效应在语言处理中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Mar;49(3):431-444. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001201. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
2
SCOPE: The South Carolina psycholinguistic metabase.范围:南卡罗来纳州心理语言学元数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2853-2884. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01934-0. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
3
Is a boat bigger than a ship? Null results in the investigation of vowel sound symbolism on size judgements in real language.
船一定比艇大吗?真实语言中音值象征大小判断的研究得出了零结果。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jan;76(1):28-43. doi: 10.1177/17470218221078299. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
4
How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.表象能力、具体性、感知强度和动作强度对识别记忆、词汇判断和朗读表现的预测效果如何。
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):622-636. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1924789. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability?探索单词的可记性:不同的单词属性对项目自由回忆概率的解释程度如何?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):583-595. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01820-w. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
A Sound Explanation for Motor Cortex Engagement during Action Word Comprehension.动作词理解过程中运动皮层参与的合理解释。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jan;33(1):129-145. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01640. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Consistency norms for 37,677 english words.一致性规范,适用于 37677 个英文单词。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2535-2555. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01391-7.
8
The Auditory English Lexicon Project: A multi-talker, multi-region psycholinguistic database of 10,170 spoken words and nonwords.听觉英语词汇项目:一个包含 10170 个口语词和非词的多说话人、多区域心理语言学数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):2202-2231. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01352-0.
9
The Promise-and Challenge-of Statistical Learning for Elucidating Atypical Language Development.统计学习在阐明非典型语言发展方面的前景与挑战。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):492-500. doi: 10.1177/0963721418779977. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
10
An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach.使用大规模研究方法对自由回忆和识别记忆中的词汇语义效应进行项目级分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2207-2222. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739834. Epub 2018 Jan 1.