Department of Food Science and Health, Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA), Avenida Menéndez-Pidal, SN, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
Department of Food Science and Health, Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA), Avenida Menéndez-Pidal, SN, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
J Chromatogr A. 2018 Nov 9;1575:100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
The present study compared and validated two analytical methods, HPLC-HRMS, and GC-MS using MSTFA as derivatization agent, for the analysis of microbiota-derived phenolic acids and aromatic compounds accumulating in urine, collected over a 24 h period after the consumption of 500 mL of orange juice. In addition, purification procedures using SDB-L and HLB solid phase cartridges were compared when HPLC-HRMS technique was used. Both HPLC-HRMS and GC-MS methodologies were successfully validated in terms of specificity, sensitivity, limit of detection and quantification, recovery and matrix effects. HPLC-HRMS, unlike GC-MS, does not require sample derivatization prior to analysis. GC-MS was not suitable for the analysis of phenolic sulfate and glucuronide metabolites because of their lack of volatility. These phase II metabolites could, however, be analysed by HPLC-HRMS which, as a consequence, provided more detailed and complete information on the phenolic compounds derived from microbiota-mediated degradation of orange juice (poly)phenols. Furthermore, the use of SDB-L and HLB cartridges for sample purification prior to HPLC-HRMS analysis is suitable for free phenolics and glucuronide metabolites but not sulfate derivatives. These findings highlight that the use of an inappropriate analytical protocol can adversely affect studies on the bioavailability of dietary (poly)phenols in which microbiota-derived phenolic catabolites play an important role.
本研究比较并验证了两种分析方法,即 HPLC-HRMS 和 GC-MS,均采用 MSTFA 作为衍生化试剂,用于分析在饮用 500 毫升橙汁后 24 小时内尿液中积累的微生物衍生酚酸和芳香族化合物。此外,当使用 HPLC-HRMS 技术时,还比较了使用 SDB-L 和 HLB 固相萃取柱的纯化程序。HPLC-HRMS 和 GC-MS 方法均在特异性、灵敏度、检测限和定量限、回收率和基质效应方面得到了成功验证。与 GC-MS 不同,HPLC-HRMS 无需在分析前对样品进行衍生化。由于缺乏挥发性,GC-MS 不适合分析酚硫酸盐和葡萄糖醛酸代谢物。然而,这些 II 相代谢物可以通过 HPLC-HRMS 进行分析,因此,HPLC-HRMS 提供了关于源自微生物群介导的橙汁(多)酚降解的酚化合物的更详细和完整的信息。此外,在进行 HPLC-HRMS 分析之前,使用 SDB-L 和 HLB 柱对样品进行纯化适用于游离酚类和葡萄糖醛酸代谢物,但不适用于硫酸盐衍生物。这些发现强调,使用不适当的分析方案可能会对涉及微生物群衍生酚类代谢物发挥重要作用的饮食(多)酚生物利用度研究产生不利影响。