Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Södertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
Department of Research, Södertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet at Danderyds Hospital (KIDS), Stockholm, Sweden.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec;19(12):1124-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
Although dehydration can affect mental and physical health, there is no clear, consistent, and reproducible diagnostic tool for this condition in older people. We applied multiple methods to detect dehydration with the aim of assessing the value of using urine analysis for this purpose.
Nonrandomized cohort study.
Sixty nursing home residents, aged 64-103 (mean 84) years.
Sampling of morning urine, blood analyses, and clinical examination. A previously validated algorithm summarized the urine specific gravity, osmolality, creatinine, and color to a Fluid Retention Index (FRI).
The cut-off for renal fluid conservation consistent with dehydration (FRI ≥ 4.0) was reached by 51% of the cohort. No statistically significant linear correlation was found between FRI and serum osmolality (mean 307.5 mOsmol/kg) or plasma sodium (mean 139 mmol/L), but the subjects reported less thirst with increasing FRI scores (linear correlation r = -0.35; P < .03). Clinical examinations of mucous membranes and tongue furrows did not correlate with other markers of dehydration. Subjects with sunken eyes had higher C-reactive protein (P < .02) and lower albumin (P < .002) concentrations in plasma than the others, while impaired skin turgor only correlated with age (P < .04).
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Renal fluid conservation consistent with dehydration was found in half of the nursing home residents, which could partially be accounted for by decreased thirst. Clinical examinations probably reflected the physical status and age more than dehydration. The lack of correlation between the serum osmolality and the FRI, both of which are purported to be gold standards for dehydration, raises questions about whether a gold standard exists.
尽管脱水会影响身心健康,但老年人中尚无明确、一致且可重复的脱水诊断工具。我们应用了多种方法来检测脱水,旨在评估尿液分析在这方面的价值。
非随机队列研究。
60 名养老院居民,年龄 64-103 岁(平均 84 岁)。
采集清晨尿液、血液分析和临床检查。先前经过验证的算法将尿比重、渗透压、肌酐和颜色综合为一个液体潴留指数(FRI)。
符合脱水的肾脏保水能力的截断值(FRI≥4.0)达到了队列的 51%。FRI 与血清渗透压(平均 307.5 mOsmol/kg)或血浆钠(平均 139mmol/L)之间未发现统计学上显著的线性相关性,但随着 FRI 评分的增加,患者报告的口渴程度降低(线性相关性 r=-0.35;P<.03)。黏膜和舌沟的临床检查与其他脱水标志物无相关性。眼球凹陷的患者的 C 反应蛋白(P<.02)和血浆白蛋白(P<.002)浓度较高,而皮肤弹性差仅与年龄相关(P<.04)。
结论/意义:养老院居民中有一半人存在与脱水相符的肾脏保水能力,这部分可能是由于口渴感降低所致。临床检查可能更多地反映了身体状况和年龄,而不是脱水情况。血清渗透压和 FRI 之间缺乏相关性,这两者都被认为是脱水的金标准,这使得人们对是否存在金标准产生了疑问。