• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为适应车道保持系统:暴露和退出的影响。

Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.

机构信息

Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2019 Feb;61(1):152-164. doi: 10.1177/0018720818800538. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1177/0018720818800538
PMID:30235014
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A driving simulator study was conducted to evaluate the longitudinal effects of an intervention and withdrawal of a lane keeping system on driving performance and cognitive workload.

BACKGROUND

Autonomous vehicle systems are being implemented into the vehicle fleet. However, limited research exists in understanding the carryover effects of long-term exposure.

METHODS

Forty-eight participants (30 treatment, 18 control) completed eight drives across three separate days in a driving simulator. The treatment group had an intervention and withdrawal of a lane keeping system. Changes in driving performance (standard deviation of lateral position [SDLP] and mean time to collision [TTC]) and cognitive workload (response time and miss rate to a detection response task) were modeled using mixed effects linear and negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

Drivers exposed to the lane keeping system had an increase in SDLP after the system was withdrawn relative to their baseline. Drivers with lane keeping had decreased mean TTC during and after system withdrawal compared with manual drivers. There was an increase in cognitive workload when the lane keeping system was withdrawn relative to when the system was engaged.

CONCLUSION

Behavioral adaptations in driving performance and cognitive workload were present during automation and persisted after the automation was withdrawn.

APPLICATION

The findings of this research emphasize the importance to consider the effects of skill atrophy and misplaced trust due to semi-autonomous vehicle systems. Designers and policymakers can utilize this for system alerts and training.

摘要

目的

本驾驶模拟器研究旨在评估车道保持系统干预和退出对驾驶性能和认知负荷的纵向影响。

背景

自动驾驶汽车系统正在被应用于汽车领域。然而,对于长期暴露的后续影响,相关研究仍十分有限。

方法

48 名参与者(30 名治疗组,18 名对照组)在驾驶模拟器中进行了三次为期三天的八次驾驶。治疗组的车道保持系统会进行干预和退出。驾驶性能(横向位置标准差 [SDLP] 和碰撞平均时间 [TTC])和认知负荷(检测响应任务的响应时间和错误率)的变化使用混合效应线性和负二项回归进行建模。

结果

与基线相比,暴露于车道保持系统的驾驶员在系统退出后 SDLP 增加。与手动驾驶的驾驶员相比,在系统退出期间和之后,车道保持的驾驶员 TTC 均值降低。与系统启用时相比,当车道保持系统退出时,认知负荷增加。

结论

在自动化期间和自动化退出后,驾驶性能和认知负荷方面存在行为适应性。

应用

本研究结果强调了考虑因半自动汽车系统导致的技能萎缩和信任错位的重要性。设计师和政策制定者可以利用这一点进行系统警报和培训。

相似文献

1
Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.行为适应车道保持系统:暴露和退出的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Feb;61(1):152-164. doi: 10.1177/0018720818800538. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
2
Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.衰老:使用纵向和横向预警系统的老年人驾驶行为
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):229-248. doi: 10.1177/0018720819864510. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
3
Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.通过非驾驶任务评估自动驾驶员支持系统故障期间驾驶员的反应。
J Safety Res. 2017 Jun;61:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
Post Take-Over Performance Varies in Drivers of Automated and Connected Vehicle Technology in Near-Miss Scenarios.接管后在险些发生碰撞的场景中,自动化和联网车辆技术驱动因素的性能各异。
Hum Factors. 2024 Nov;66(11):2503-2517. doi: 10.1177/00187208231219184. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
5
The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.自动驾驶中对运动控制要求对驾驶员眼动模式的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105788. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105788. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
6
Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.引言很重要:操纵对自动化的信任和对自动驾驶的依赖。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jan;66:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
7
Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies.触觉转向引导会引发超速吗?一项关于原因及补救措施的驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:372-387. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload.技能与此有何关系?车辆自动化与驾驶员心理负荷。
Ergonomics. 2007 Aug;50(8):1324-39. doi: 10.1080/00140130701318855.
9
Is improved lane keeping during cognitive load caused by increased physical arousal or gaze concentration toward the road center?认知负荷增加时,车道保持能力提高是由于身体唤醒度增加还是由于注视道路中心?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.在自动驾驶级别 2 期间执行额外任务的性能:一项比较具有和不具有部分自动化经验的驾驶员的道路研究。
Hum Factors. 2018 Sep;60(6):778-792. doi: 10.1177/0018720818773636. Epub 2018 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Impairment and Driving Skills in Youth After Concussion.青少年脑震荡后认知障碍与驾驶技能。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jun;40(11-12):1187-1196. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0308. Epub 2022 Dec 26.