• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衰老:使用纵向和横向预警系统的老年人驾驶行为

Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.

作者信息

Souders Dustin J, Charness Neil, Roque Nelson A, Pham Hellen

机构信息

311308 Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.

166299 Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):229-248. doi: 10.1177/0018720819864510. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1177/0018720819864510
PMID:31361158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6989382/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed older drivers' driving behavior when using longitudinal and lateral vehicle warning systems together.

BACKGROUND

Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) can benefit drivers of all ages. Previous research with younger to middle-aged samples suggests that safety benefits are not necessarily additive with additional ADAS. Increases in following distance associated with the use of forward collision warning (FCW) decreased when drivers also used lane departure warning (LDW), likely due to attending to the LDW more than the FCW.

METHOD

The current study used a driving simulator to provide 128 older drivers experience with FCW and/or LDW system(s) during a ~25-min drive to gauge their usage's effects on driving performance and subjective workload.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences found in headway distance between older drivers who used different combinations of FCW and LDW systems, but those who used an FCW system showed significantly longer time-to-collision (TTC) when approaching the critical event than those who did not. Users of LDW systems did not show reductions in standard deviation of lane position. Analyses of subjective workload measures showed no significant differences between conditions.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that FCW could increase older drivers' TTC over the course of a drive. Contrary to previous findings in younger samples, concurrent use of FCW and LDW systems did not adversely affect older drivers' longitudinal driving performance and subjective workload.

APPLICATION

Potential applications of this research include the assessment of older drivers' use of vehicle warning systems and their effects on subjective workload.

摘要

目的

本研究评估老年驾驶员同时使用纵向和横向车辆预警系统时的驾驶行为。

背景

先进驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)对所有年龄段的驾驶员都有益处。先前针对年轻至中年样本的研究表明,额外增加ADAS系统,其安全效益不一定会叠加。当驾驶员同时使用车道偏离预警(LDW)时,与使用前方碰撞预警(FCW)相关的跟车距离增加量会减少,这可能是因为驾驶员对LDW的关注超过了FCW。

方法

本研究使用驾驶模拟器,让128名老年驾驶员在约25分钟的驾驶过程中体验FCW和/或LDW系统,以评估其使用对驾驶性能和主观工作量的影响。

结果

使用不同组合的FCW和LDW系统的老年驾驶员在车头间距上没有显著差异,但与未使用FCW系统的驾驶员相比,使用FCW系统的驾驶员在接近关键事件时的碰撞时间(TTC)明显更长。使用LDW系统的驾驶员在车道位置标准差方面没有降低。主观工作量测量分析显示不同条件之间没有显著差异。

结论

研究结果表明,在驾驶过程中FCW可以增加老年驾驶员的TTC。与先前在年轻样本中的研究结果相反,同时使用FCW和LDW系统不会对老年驾驶员的纵向驾驶性能和主观工作量产生不利影响。

应用

本研究的潜在应用包括评估老年驾驶员对车辆预警系统的使用及其对主观工作量的影响。

相似文献

1
Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.衰老:使用纵向和横向预警系统的老年人驾驶行为
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):229-248. doi: 10.1177/0018720819864510. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.量产前碰撞和车道偏离预警系统预期的碰撞减少及伤害降低情况比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S109-14. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1063619.
3
Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.来自100辆汽车自然驾驶研究的制动时碰撞时间的年龄和性别差异。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S15-20. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.928703.
4
Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?驾驶配备部分自主式前方碰撞预警系统的汽车:驾驶员的反应如何?
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):698-708. doi: 10.1177/0018720812439712.
5
Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.带有前向碰撞警告系统的模拟器培训:对驾驶员-系统交互和驾驶员信任的影响。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):709-21. doi: 10.1177/0018720812441796.
6
Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.行为适应车道保持系统:暴露和退出的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Feb;61(1):152-164. doi: 10.1177/0018720818800538. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.来自100辆汽车自然驾驶研究的超车操作过程中的驾驶员行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S176-81. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1057281.
8
Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.练习造就完美——带有多阶段碰撞预警系统的驾驶学习效果。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
Influence of lane departure warnings onset and reliability on car drivers' behaviors.车道偏离警告的启动和可靠性对汽车驾驶员行为的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Mar;59(Pt A):123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
10
Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.自适应前向碰撞警告系统的不良行为适应:主任务和次要任务性能的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105718. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105718. Epub 2020 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving Difficulties and Preferences of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems by Older Drivers With Central Vision Loss.中老年驾驶员中央视力丧失对先进驾驶辅助系统的驾驶困难和偏好。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Oct 3;12(10):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.10.7.
2
Preferred Sources of Information, Knowledge, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicle Systems: Effects of Gender and Age.自动化车辆系统信息、知识的首选来源及接受度:性别与年龄的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:806552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806552. eCollection 2022.
3
Relative effectiveness of general versus specific cognitive training for aging adults.老年人一般认知训练与特定认知训练的相对效果。
Psychol Aging. 2022 Mar;37(2):210-221. doi: 10.1037/pag0000663. Epub 2021 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
EFFECTIVENESS OF A HEADS-UP ADAPTIVE LANE DEVIATION WARNING SYSTEM FOR MIDDLE-AGED & OLDER ADULTS.面向中老年人的抬头自适应车道偏离预警系统的有效性
Proc Int Driv Symp Hum Factors Driv Assess Train Veh Des. 2015 Jun;2015:422-428. doi: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1604.
2
Forward Collision Warning: Clues to Optimal Timing of Advisory Warnings.前方碰撞预警:最佳预警时机的线索
SAE Int J Transp Saf. 2016 Apr;4(1):107-112. doi: 10.4271/2016-01-1439.
3
The impact of false warnings on partial and full lane departure warnings effectiveness and acceptance in car driving.错误警告对汽车驾驶中部分和全车道偏离警告有效性及接受度的影响。
Ergonomics. 2016 Dec;59(12):1553-1564. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1158323. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
4
Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.丰田汽车驾驶员使用动态雷达巡航控制系统、预碰撞系统和车道保持辅助系统的体验。
J Safety Res. 2016 Feb;56:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
5
Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.2011 年款道奇和吉普车主在使用防撞和相关技术方面的体验。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:298-303. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.936408.
6
The drive-wise project: driving simulator training increases real driving performance in healthy older drivers.智能驾驶计划:驾驶模拟器训练可提高健康老年驾驶员的实际驾驶表现。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 May 13;6:85. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00085. eCollection 2014.
7
Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.沃尔沃驾驶员对先进碰撞避免技术及相关技术的体验
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(2):187-95. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.798409.
8
Can we improve clinical prediction of at-risk older drivers?我们能否提高对高危老年驾驶员的临床预测能力?
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:537-47. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.037. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
9
When compensation fails: attentional deficits in healthy ageing caused by visual distraction.当补偿失效时:视觉分心导致健康老龄化的注意力缺陷。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.033. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
10
A literature review of major perceptual, cognitive, and/or physical test batteries for older drivers.对老年驾驶员主要感知、认知和/或身体测试组合的文献综述。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:5381-3. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0825-5381.