Division of Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Japan, Suita Osaka, Japan; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Division of Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Japan, Suita Osaka, Japan.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;4(9):1227-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
This study aimed to clarify the clinical impact of transient atrial fibrillation (AF) attacks themselves and the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with intermittent AF.
The benefit of CRT in patients with intermittent AF, especially the effect of the AF attacks themselves, remains unclear.
Among our cohort of 269 consecutive CRT patients, we compared the percent of biventricular pacing (BIVP%) and other clinical characteristics between patients with intermittent AF and those with sinus rhythm (SR).
During a median follow-up of 942 days (interquartile range: 379 to 1,464 days) a total of 22 patients, including 59% of CRT responders, developed heart failure (HF) due to a transient AF attack itself, and that accounted for 21% of all HF events. The BIVP% during the AF attacks was significantly lower than that during SR (p < 0.05). When compared to the SR groups, patients with intermittent AF had a significantly higher risk of developing HF or death (hazard ratio: 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 3.8). However, the patients who received a BIVP% of ≥90% during AF attacks were comparable to those with SR (hazard ratio: 1.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.4 to 3.0).
A substantial number of patients developed HF due to transient AF attacks themselves even in the CRT responders, and the reason was mainly due to the loss of the BIVP%.
本研究旨在阐明阵发性心房颤动(AF)发作本身对间歇性 AF 患者的临床影响,以及心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的疗效。
间歇性 AF 患者 CRT 的获益,尤其是 AF 发作本身的影响,尚不清楚。
在我们的 269 例连续 CRT 患者队列中,我们比较了间歇性 AF 患者和窦性节律(SR)患者的双心室起搏(BIVP)%和其他临床特征。
在中位随访 942 天(四分位距:379 至 1464 天)期间,共有 22 例患者(包括 59%的 CRT 反应者)因一过性 AF 发作本身发生心力衰竭(HF),占所有 HF 事件的 21%。AF 发作期间的 BIVP%明显低于 SR 期间(p<0.05)。与 SR 组相比,间歇性 AF 患者发生 HF 或死亡的风险明显更高(风险比:2.2;95%置信区间:1.3 至 3.8)。然而,在 AF 发作期间接受 BIVP%≥90%的患者与 SR 患者相当(风险比:1.2;95%置信区间:0.4 至 3.0)。
即使在 CRT 反应者中,也有相当数量的患者因一过性 AF 发作本身而发生 HF,主要原因是 BIVP 的丧失。