Smithgall Sean E, Alexander Katelyn M, Burchette Jessica E, Cluck David B, Sevak Rajkumar J
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, 650 Clinic Dr. Suite 2100, Mobile, AL 36688, United States.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bill Gatton College of Pharmacy, East Tennessee State University, Maple Ave, Bldg. 7, PO Box 70300, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jul;10(7):834-841. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether certain personality traits are as prominent in pharmacy practice residents who obtain positions through the post-Match process, previously referred to as the Scramble, as compared to residents who match directly with programs.
Pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs) across the United States were asked to complete an electronic survey that gauged RPD perceptions of 13 personality traits commonly seen in pharmacy residents. RPDs were requested to separately evaluate residents who Scrambled and Matched to their respective programs. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to determine factor structure for the personality traits and to assess whether factors associate differentially between Matched and Scrambled residents.
A total of 1876 RPDs of post-graduate year one (PGY1), post-graduate year two (PGY2), and combined PGY1 and PGY2 pharmacy residency programs were contacted for study participation with a response rate of 21 percent. Demographic variables related to program type and number of residents per class were similar between Scrambled and Matched groups. The EFA identified two factors across 13 traits: we termed them as traditional traits and grit-like traits, and they significantly differed between the Scramble and Match groups. RPD perception of traditional traits (nine traits) were significantly higher in the Match group (p < 0.05), whereas perceived grit-like traits (four traits) were significantly higher in the Scramble group (p < 0.0001).
Residency candidates who Match versus candidates who Scramble are perceived to have unique and significantly different personality traits.
本研究的目的是确定与直接与项目匹配的住院医师相比,通过“二次匹配”(以前称为“抢位”)过程获得职位的药学实践住院医师中某些人格特质是否同样突出。
美国各地的药学住院医师项目主任被要求完成一项电子调查,该调查衡量了项目主任对药学住院医师中常见的13种人格特质的看法。要求项目主任分别评估通过“抢位”进入和匹配到各自项目的住院医师。探索性因素分析(EFA)用于确定人格特质的因素结构,并评估匹配组和“抢位”组之间因素的差异关联。
总共联系了1876名一年级(PGY1)、二年级(PGY2)以及PGY1和PGY2联合的药学住院医师项目主任参与研究,回复率为21%。“抢位”组和匹配组在与项目类型和每班住院医师人数相关的人口统计学变量方面相似。探索性因素分析在13种特质中确定了两个因素:我们将它们称为传统特质和坚韧类特质,并且它们在“抢位”组和匹配组之间存在显著差异。匹配组中项目主任对传统特质(9种特质)的看法显著更高(p<0.05),而“抢位”组中对坚韧类特质(4种特质)的看法显著更高(p<0.0001)。
与通过“抢位”的候选人相比,匹配成功的住院医师候选人被认为具有独特且显著不同的人格特质。