Torre Monmany Nuria, Behrsin Joanna, Leslie Andrew
CenTre Neonatal Transport Service, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 May;55(5):518-522. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14232. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Servo-controlled therapeutic hypothermia is a routine therapy for babies with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in the neonatal unit and is delivered in designated cooling centres. It is increasingly being used during neonatal transport in the UK to deliver this therapy in a timelier manner for babies not born in a cooling centre. Prior to the implementation of this treatment, passive cooling alone was used in transport. Comparison of passive and servo-controlled cooling during neonatal transfers with reference to: (i) the proportion of babies in the therapeutic range (33-34°C) at three time points during the transport mission (arrival of the team at the referring unit, departure of the team from the referring unit and at the completion of transport); (ii) the proportion of babies overcooled at any point once the transport team was present (<33°C); and (iii) duration of phases of the transfer to evaluate the impact of active cooling on how long it takes to undertake transfer.
This was a retrospective observational study comparing babies with passive and servo-controlled hypothermia (January 2015 to May 2016) following introduction of the servo-controlled cooling mattress.
A total of 48 patients were treated with hypothermia in transit (29 passive, 19 servo-controlled). The median gestational age (GA) was 40 weeks (interquartile range: 39-41) and mean birthweight (BW) 3420 g (standard deviation 600 g); there was no differences in GA, BW and clinical characteristics between the groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the temperature at the end of the transport, where 94% (n = 18) of babies who received servo-controlled cooling were in the target temperature in comparison with only 65% (n = 19) of the passive cooling group babies (P = 0.045). In addition, none of the babies in the servo-controlled group were warm (>34°C) at the end of the transfer. Babies who underwent servo-controlled cooling are more likely to maintain a target temperature (33-34°C) (17 (89%) vs. 17 (58%), P = 0.021); in particular, there is less overcooling (<33°C) in this group (2 (10%) vs. 15 (51%), P = 0.004). Total mission time was not significantly different.
The use of servo-controlled cooling devices during neonatal transport improves the ability to maintain the baby's temperature within the target range (33-34°C) with less overcooling.
伺服控制的治疗性低温是新生儿病房中缺氧缺血性脑病患儿的常规治疗方法,在指定的降温中心进行。在英国,越来越多地在新生儿转运期间使用这种方法,以便为未在降温中心出生的婴儿更及时地提供这种治疗。在实施这种治疗之前,转运过程中仅采用被动降温。比较新生儿转运期间被动降温和伺服控制降温的情况,参考指标如下:(i)在转运任务的三个时间点(团队抵达转诊单位、团队离开转诊单位以及转运完成时)处于治疗温度范围(33 - 34°C)的婴儿比例;(ii)转运团队到场后任何时间点体温过低(<33°C)的婴儿比例;(iii)转运各阶段的时长,以评估主动降温对转运所需时间的影响。
这是一项回顾性观察研究,比较在引入伺服控制降温床垫后(2015年1月至2016年5月)接受被动降温和伺服控制降温的婴儿情况。
共有48例患儿在转运过程中接受了低温治疗(29例被动降温,19例伺服控制降温)。中位胎龄(GA)为40周(四分位间距:39 - 41周),平均出生体重(BW)为3420 g(标准差600 g);两组之间的胎龄、出生体重和临床特征无差异。转运结束时温度存在统计学显著差异,接受伺服控制降温的婴儿中有94%(n = 18)达到目标温度,而被动降温组婴儿只有65%(n = 19)达到目标温度(P = 0.045)。此外,转运结束时伺服控制组没有婴儿体温过高(>34°C)。接受伺服控制降温的婴儿更有可能维持目标温度(33 - 34°C)(17例(89%)对17例(58%),P = 0.021);特别是,该组体温过低(<33°C)的情况较少(2例(10%)对15例(51%),P = 0.004)。总任务时间无显著差异。
在新生儿转运期间使用伺服控制降温设备可提高将婴儿体温维持在目标范围(33 - 34°C)内的能力,且体温过低情况较少。