Goel Nitin, Mohinuddin Syed Makhtum, Ratnavel Nandiran, Kempley Stephen, Sinha Ajay
Neonatal Transfer Service, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Neonatal Medicine, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Jan;34(1):19-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584151. Epub 2016 May 16.
The recent availability of servo-controlled cooling equipment on transport makes it possible to commence active cooling at the referral unit for infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. This study aimed to compare the temperature and transfer variables in passively and actively cooled babies. This is a retrospective cohort study comparing two groups-passively cooled (July 2011 to August 2012) versus actively cooled group (September 2012 to June 2013), following introduction of active hypothermia using servo-controlled cooling mattress by the London Neonatal Transfer Service (NTS). Seventy-six infants were passively cooled and 69 were actively cooled. There was a significant difference between the temperatures of the two groups at each point in the transfer episode: on arrival of NTS, during stabilization, during transfer, and at the receiving hospital. Median time to achieve target temperature was 30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23-37) minutes in actively cooled, significantly shorter in comparison to 130 (95% CI: 83-177) minutes in passively cooled babies. Of the 69 newborns, 62 (90%) had temperature within target range at receiving center in actively cooled group as compared with 30/76 (40%) in passively cooled group. The use of active cooling during neonatal transfer achieves target temperature in a shorter period and maintains better temperature stability.
近期运输过程中伺服控制冷却设备的出现,使得在转诊单位对患有缺氧缺血性脑病的婴儿开始进行主动降温成为可能。本研究旨在比较被动降温和主动降温婴儿的体温及转运变量。 这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较了两组——被动降温组(2011年7月至2012年8月)和主动降温组(2012年9月至2013年6月),这是在伦敦新生儿转运服务(NTS)引入使用伺服控制冷却床垫进行主动低温治疗之后。 76名婴儿接受了被动降温,69名接受了主动降温。在转运过程中的每个时间点,两组的体温存在显著差异:在NTS到达时、稳定期、转运期间以及在接收医院时。主动降温的婴儿达到目标温度的中位时间为30分钟(95%置信区间[CI]:23 - 37),与被动降温婴儿的130分钟(95%CI:83 - 177)相比明显更短。在69名新生儿中,主动降温组有62名(90%)在接收中心时体温处于目标范围内,而被动降温组为30/76(40%)。 在新生儿转运过程中使用主动降温能在更短时间内达到目标温度,并保持更好的温度稳定性。