Laboratório de Microbiologia Molecular, Universidade Feevale, ERS 239, no 2755, Novo Hamburgo, RS 93352-000, Brazil.
School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, El Paso, TX 79902, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 1):298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.177. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
In this study, total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli, enterovirus (EV), rotavirus (RV), and human mastadenovirus species C and F (HAdV-C and HAdV-F) were evaluated in water samples from Belo Stream. For HAdV-C and F, the infectivity was assessed by integrated cell culture quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (ICC-qPCR). Samples were collected monthly (May/2015 to April/2016) at four sites. Viral analyses were performed for both ultracentrifuge-concentrated and unconcentrated samples. For site P4 (used for recreational purposes), QMRA was applied to estimate health risks associated with exposure to E. coli and HAdV-C and F. TC and E. coli were present throughout the collection period. EV and RV were not detected. HAdV-C were present in 8.51% (1.89E + 06 to 2.28E + 07 GC (Genomic Copies)/L) and 21.27% (2.36E + 05 to 1.29E + 07 GC/L) for unconcentrated and concentrated samples, respectively. For HAdV-F were 12.76% (2.77E + 07 to 3.31E + 08 GC/L) and 48.93% (1.10E + 05 to 4.50E + 08 GC/L) for unconcentrated and concentrated samples, respectively. For unconcentrated samples, infectivity for HAdV-C was detected in 37.20% (1st ICC-qPCR) and 25.58% (2nd ICC-qPCR). For HAdV-F, infectivity was detected in 6.97% (1st ICC-qPCR) and 6.97% (2nd ICC-qPCR). For concentrated samples, HAdV-C infectious was observed in 17.02% (1st ICC-qPCR) and in 8.51% (2nd ICC-qPCR). For HAdV-F, were present in 8.51% for both 1st and 2nd ICC-qPCR. Statistical analyzes showed significant difference between the collection sites when analyzed the molecular data of HAdV-F, data of TC and E. coli. Correlation tests showed direct correlation between HAdV-F with E. coli and TC. E. coli concentrations translated to the lowest estimates of infection risks (8.58E-05 to 2.17E-03). HAdV-F concentrations were associated with the highest infection risks at 9.99E-01 and for group C, 1.29E-01 to 9.99E-01. These results show that commonly used bacterial indicators for water quality may not infer health risks associated with viruses in recreational freshwaters.
在这项研究中,我们评估了贝洛河水样中的总大肠菌群(TC)、大肠杆菌、肠病毒(EV)、轮状病毒(RV)以及人腺病毒 C 型和 F 型(HAdV-C 和 HAdV-F)。对于 HAdV-C 和 F,通过整合细胞培养定量实时聚合酶链反应(ICC-qPCR)评估其感染力。每月(2015 年 5 月至 2016 年 4 月)在四个地点采集样本。对超离心浓缩和未浓缩的样本均进行了病毒分析。对于用于娱乐目的的 P4 点,应用定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)来估计与大肠杆菌和 HAdV-C 和 F 暴露相关的健康风险。TC 和大肠杆菌在整个采集期间均存在。未检测到 EV 和 RV。HAdV-C 在未浓缩和浓缩样本中的检出率分别为 8.51%(1.89E+06 至 2.28E+07 基因组拷贝/升)和 21.27%(2.36E+05 至 1.29E+07 基因组拷贝/升)。HAdV-F 的检出率分别为 12.76%(2.77E+07 至 3.31E+08 基因组拷贝/升)和 48.93%(1.10E+05 至 4.50E+08 基因组拷贝/升)。对于未浓缩样本,HAdV-C 的感染力在第 1 次 ICC-qPCR 中检测到 37.20%,在第 2 次 ICC-qPCR 中检测到 25.58%。对于 HAdV-F,第 1 次 ICC-qPCR 和第 2 次 ICC-qPCR 的感染力分别为 6.97%。对于浓缩样本,在第 1 次 ICC-qPCR 中观察到 HAdV-C 的感染力为 17.02%,在第 2 次 ICC-qPCR 中为 8.51%。HAdV-F 在第 1 次和第 2 次 ICC-qPCR 中均为 8.51%。统计学分析显示,在分析 HAdV-F、TC 和大肠杆菌的分子数据时,各采集点之间存在显著差异。相关性检验表明 HAdV-F 与大肠杆菌和 TC 呈直接相关。大肠杆菌浓度转化为最低的感染风险估计值(8.58E-05 至 2.17E-03)。HAdV-F 浓度与最高的感染风险相关,在 9.99E-01 和组 C 中为 1.29E-01 至 9.99E-01。这些结果表明,常用于水质的细菌指标可能无法推断与娱乐性淡水中病毒相关的健康风险。