• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的 ICU 败血症患者 1 年死亡率预测模型。

A machine learning-based model for 1-year mortality prediction in patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit with a diagnosis of sepsis.

机构信息

Engineering and Software Investigation Group, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Medellín, Colombia.

Critical and Intensive Care, Medellín Clinic, Medellín, Colombia; Critical and Intensive Care Program, CES University, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 Apr;44(3):160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.medin.2018.07.016
PMID:30245121
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is associated to a high mortality rate, and its severity must be evaluated quickly. The severity of illness scores used are intended to be applicable to all patient populations, and generally evaluate in-hospital mortality. However, patients with sepsis continue to be at risk of death after hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a model for predicting 1-year mortality in critical patients diagnosed with sepsis.

PATIENTS

The data corresponding to 5650 admissions of patients with sepsis from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database were evaluated, randomly divided as follows: 70% for training and 30% for validation.

DESIGN

A retrospective register-based cohort study was carried out. The clinical information of the first 24h after admission was used to develop a 1-year mortality prediction model based on Stochastic Gradient Boosting (SGB) methodology. Variable selection was addressed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and SGB variable importance methodologies. The predictive power was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

An AUROC of 0.8039 (95% confidence interval (CI): [0.8033 0.8045]) was obtained in the validation subset. The model exceeded the predictive performances obtained with traditional severity of disease scores in the same subset.

CONCLUSION

The use of assembly algorithms, such as SGB, for the generation of a customized model for sepsis yields more accurate 1-year mortality prediction than the traditional scoring systems such as SAPS II, SOFA or OASIS.

摘要

简介

败血症与高死亡率相关,其严重程度必须迅速评估。用于评估的疾病严重程度评分旨在适用于所有患者群体,通常评估住院死亡率。然而,败血症患者在出院后仍有死亡风险。

目的

开发一种预测确诊败血症的危重症患者 1 年死亡率的模型。

患者

评估了来自医疗信息重症监护数据库(MIMIC-III)的 5650 例败血症患者的住院数据,随机分为以下两组:70%用于训练,30%用于验证。

设计

回顾性基于登记的队列研究。使用入院后 24 小时内的临床信息,基于随机梯度增强(SGB)方法开发 1 年死亡率预测模型。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)和 SGB 变量重要性方法进行变量选择。使用 ROC 曲线下面积(AUROC)评估预测能力。

结果

在验证组中获得了 0.8039(95%置信区间[0.8033 0.8045])的 AUROC。该模型在同一验证组中的表现优于传统疾病严重程度评分的预测性能。

结论

使用组装算法(如 SGB)生成败血症的定制模型,比 SAPS II、SOFA 或 OASIS 等传统评分系统更能准确预测 1 年死亡率。

相似文献

1
A machine learning-based model for 1-year mortality prediction in patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit with a diagnosis of sepsis.基于机器学习的 ICU 败血症患者 1 年死亡率预测模型。
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 Apr;44(3):160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
2
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
3
Comparing ensemble learning algorithms and severity of illness scoring systems in cardiac intensive care units: a retrospective study.比较心脏重症监护病房中的集成学习算法和疾病严重程度评分系统:一项回顾性研究。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Oct 14;22:eAO0467. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0467. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluate prognostic accuracy of SOFA component score for mortality among adults with sepsis by machine learning method.采用机器学习方法评估 SOFA 评分对脓毒症成人死亡率的预后准确性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08045-x.
5
Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): a population-based study.重症监护病房死亡率预测的超级 ICU 学习者算法(SICULA):一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jan;3(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70239-5. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
6
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
7
Biological signatures and prediction of an immunosuppressive status-persistent critical illness-among orthopedic trauma patients using machine learning techniques.利用机器学习技术对骨科创伤患者免疫抑制状态持续的危重症进行生物学特征分析和预测。
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 17;13:979877. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.979877. eCollection 2022.
8
Construction and validation of machine learning models for sepsis prediction in patients with acute pancreatitis.构建并验证用于预测急性胰腺炎患者脓毒症的机器学习模型。
BMC Surg. 2023 Sep 1;23(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02151-y.
9
Prediction model of in-hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients with cardiac arrest: a retrospective analysis of MIMIC -IV database based on machine learning.基于机器学习的 MIMIC-IV 数据库中 ICU 心搏骤停患者院内死亡率预测模型:回顾性分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 May 25;23(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02138-5.
10
SAPS III is superior to SOFA for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients based on Sepsis 3.0 criteria.基于 Sepsis 3.0 标准,SAPS III 比 SOFA 更能预测脓毒症患者 28 天死亡率。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting prognosis in sepsis patients with a history of cancer who were admitted to the intensive care unit.用于预测入住重症监护病房的有癌症病史的脓毒症患者预后的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
J Int Med Res. 2025 Aug;53(8):3000605251362991. doi: 10.1177/03000605251362991. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
2
Value of using blood routine indicators combined with artificial intelligence in sepsis patients.血常规指标联合人工智能在脓毒症患者中的应用价值
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):2678-2689. doi: 10.62347/MMNQ1017. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparison between traditional logistic regression and machine learning for predicting mortality in adult sepsis patients.
传统逻辑回归与机器学习在预测成年脓毒症患者死亡率方面的比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 6;11:1496869. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1496869. eCollection 2024.
4
Machine learning-based prognostic model for 30-day mortality prediction in Sepsis-3.基于机器学习的 Sepsis-3 30 天死亡率预测预后模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02655-4.
5
Chinese experts' consensus on the application of intensive care big data.中国专家关于重症监护大数据应用的共识
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 8;10:1174429. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1174429. eCollection 2023.
6
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis-related death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习在脓毒症相关死亡预测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02383-1.
7
Strategies of Predictive Schemes and Clinical Diagnosis for Prognosis Using MIMIC-III: A Systematic Review.使用MIMIC-III进行预后预测方案与临床诊断的策略:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;11(5):710. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050710.
8
Interpretable Machine Learning to Optimize Early In-Hospital Mortality Prediction for Elderly Patients with Sepsis: A Discovery Study.可解释机器学习优化老年脓毒症患者早期住院死亡率预测:一项探索性研究。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Dec 15;2022:4820464. doi: 10.1155/2022/4820464. eCollection 2022.
9
Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital.预测脓毒症风险,机器学习方法比较:弗吉尼亚州一家医院的案例研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Oct 28;27(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00843-4.
10
A Survey on Medical Explainable AI (XAI): Recent Progress, Explainability Approach, Human Interaction and Scoring System.医学可解释人工智能(XAI)调查:最新进展、可解释性方法、人机交互和评分系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 21;22(20):8068. doi: 10.3390/s22208068.