University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Psychiatric University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 15;243:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.035. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
The nature of the temporal relationship between psychological factors and mood episodes is unclear. The objectives of this study were to determine if temperament and self-esteem predict the onset of mood episodes, and if prior mood episodes influence the stability of these factors over time in high-risk offspring of bipolar parents.
Offspring of a parent with bipolar disorder participating in the Flourish Prospective Offspring Study were clinically assessed repeatedly using semi-structured KSADS-PL/SADS-L format interviews, and completed repeated measures of self-esteem, and temperament. Shared frailty survival models and mixed effects regression models were used to determine if psychological factors predicted incident mood episodes, and whether these factors change over time after the incident mood episode, respectively.
Emotionality, shyness and self-esteem were not associated with the hazard of incident major depression; however, increased activity reduced the hazard of this outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.98). Emotionality and shyness scores increased, while sociability, activity and self-esteem scores decreased after the incident major depressive episode (emotionality: mean change [MC]: 0.35, p = 0.0289; shyness: MC: 0.40, p = 0.0196; sociability: MC: -0.49, p = 0.0001, activity: MC: -0.32, p = 0.0001; self-esteem: MC: -0.79, p = 0.001).
Psychological measures were based on self-report and some models had low numbers limiting the numbers of covariates included as potential confounders.
Among the assessed temperamental dimensions, activity showed a protective effect for major depressive episode onset suggesting this temperamental characteristic could serve as a protective target in high risk youth. Conversely, all assessed psychological factors shifted towards increased vulnerability after the first depressive episode.
心理因素与情绪发作之间的时间关系性质尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定气质和自尊是否可以预测情绪发作的发生,以及先前的情绪发作是否会影响双相父母高危子女的这些因素随时间的稳定性。
参与 Flourish 前瞻性后代研究的双相父母的后代使用半结构化 KSADS-PL/SADS-L 格式访谈进行了多次临床评估,并完成了自尊和气质的重复测量。共享脆弱性生存模型和混合效应回归模型用于确定心理因素是否预测新发情绪发作,以及这些因素在新发情绪发作后是否随时间变化。
情感性、害羞和自尊与重大抑郁发作的发病风险无关;然而,增加的活动减少了这种结果的发病风险(危险比[HR]:0.51;95%置信区间:0.27,0.98)。情绪性和害羞得分增加,而社交性、活动和自尊得分在重大抑郁发作后降低(情感性:平均变化[MC]:0.35,p=0.0289;害羞:MC:0.40,p=0.0196;社交性:MC:-0.49,p=0.0001,活动:MC:-0.32,p=0.0001;自尊:MC:-0.79,p=0.001)。
心理测量是基于自我报告的,一些模型的数量较少,限制了作为潜在混杂因素纳入的协变量数量。
在所评估的气质维度中,活动对重大抑郁发作的发生具有保护作用,这表明这种气质特征可以作为高危青年的保护目标。相反,所有评估的心理因素在首次抑郁发作后都朝着增加的脆弱性转变。