Suppr超能文献

高频与低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作用于右侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)后的反应率与缓解率:一项随机双盲试验的荟萃分析

Response and Remission Rates Following High-Frequency vs. Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Over Right DLPFC for Treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind Trials.

作者信息

Cao Xu, Deng Chunshan, Su Xiaolin, Guo Yi

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Neurology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 7;9:413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00413. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

High-frequency (HF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) is the most widely applied treatment protocol for major depressive disorder (MDD), while low-frequency (LF) rTMS over the right DLPFC (R-DLPFC) also exhibits similar, if not better, efficacy for MDD. Therefore, a meta-analysis is warranted to compare the efficacy of the two protocols for MDD. We searched the literature from 1990 through to August 1, 2017 using MEDLINE, and the literature from 1995 through to August 1, 2017 using EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (PQDT). We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the efficacy of HF rTMS over the L-DLPFC and LF rTMS over the R-DLPFC for MDD, which used response and/or remission rates as the primary endpoints, with and without sham-controlled. (1) The meta-analysis of the response rates was based on 12 studies, including 361 patients with MDD (175 for HF (> 5 Hz) over the L-DLPFC, and 186 for LF (<5 Hz) over the R-DLPFC; odds ratio = 1.08; 95%, confidence interval = 0.88-1.34). (2) The meta-analysis of the remission rate was based on 5 studies, including 131 MDD patients (64 for HF over the L-DLPFC and 67 for LF over the R-DLPFC; odds ratio = 1.29; 95% confidence interval = 0.54-3.10). Both HF rTMS over the L-DLPFC and LF over the R-DLPFC demonstrated similar therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of patients with MDD. The results suggested that further investigation on treatment efficacy indicators before/during treatment is necessary and helpful for optimizing a personalized protocol for patients.

摘要

高频(HF)重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作用于左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(L-DLPFC)是治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)应用最广泛的治疗方案,而低频(LF)rTMS作用于右侧DLPFC(R-DLPFC)对MDD也表现出相似(即便不是更好)的疗效。因此,有必要进行一项荟萃分析来比较这两种方案对MDD的疗效。我们使用MEDLINE检索了1990年至2017年8月1日的文献,并使用EMBASE、PsycINFO、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、SCOPUS以及ProQuest学位论文数据库(PQDT)检索了1995年至2017年8月1日的文献。我们纳入了比较L-DLPFC上HF rTMS与R-DLPFC上LF rTMS对MDD疗效的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验以反应率和/或缓解率作为主要终点,有或没有假刺激对照。(1)反应率的荟萃分析基于12项研究,包括361例MDD患者(175例接受L-DLPFC上的HF(>5Hz)治疗,186例接受R-DLPFC上的LF(<5Hz)治疗;优势比=1.08;95%置信区间=0.88-1.34)。(2)缓解率的荟萃分析基于5项研究,包括131例MDD患者(64例接受L-DLPFC上的HF治疗,67例接受R-DLPFC上的LF治疗;优势比=1.29;95%置信区间=

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d6/6137236/29c7f02b7775/fpsyt-09-00413-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验